返回列表 回覆 發帖

First-Ever Nontheistic Billboard


The Freedom From Religion Foundation, which is the nation's largest association of atheists and agnostics, is unveiling what is believed to be the first nontheistic billboard in Madison, Wis.
The whimsical full-color 48-foot billboard mimics a stained-glass window and warns, "Beware of Dogma."
"We are launching a campaign to place freethought billboards up around the country, wherever an irreverent billboard is needed--which is practically everywhere!" says Annie Laurie Gaylor, Foundation spokeswoman.
"We don't go to Mass, but we can go to the masses," adds Dan Barker, Foundation co-president. "We think it is time for the rest of us to use the mass media to counter the ubiquity of religious messages on roadsides everywhere!"
The Foundation will be erecting another billboard to greet attendees of its 30th national convention, meeting on Oct. 12-13 in Madison. A smaller billboard on East Johnson Street by Fordem Avenue (passed by nearly everyone coming in from the airport) will carry the "Beware of Dogma" message on one side, while the other side will sport the stained-glass motif and the words "Imagine No Religion."
http://www.ffrf.org/
de omnibus dubitandum

回復 1# 的帖子

其實係咪外國好鬼多呢D教會整既 billboard?
支持鼓勵每位離教者

回復 2# 的帖子




您仲想要幾多?
de omnibus dubitandum

回復 3# 的帖子

yea...  r u ready for Jesus's coming?
原帖由 Guest from 219.76.240.x 於 2007-10-5 08:51 發表
yea...  r u ready for Jesus's coming?

I've waited for Him for 2 thousand years already...
支持鼓勵每位離教者
What do you mean first ever?

This does not count?



Or this?



[ 本帖最後由 dye 於 2007-10-5 09:47 編輯 ]

回復 5# 的帖子

o, 咁抽刀斷水兄你是一個二千年的不死人?

回復 6# 的帖子

I don't see the nontheistic message on David Suzuki's sign.
For the Ohio one, I'll call that number, see what they'll say.
de omnibus dubitandum
Dear Sherman,

You think people who have a proper education (in science) will believe in the bullshit from the Bible?

回復 9# 的帖子

That's why I need to call them.
"Do you mind to fax me a religion status report of all teaching staves?"
de omnibus dubitandum
Something like this?

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-thinkingchristians.htm

"I have also noted that many studies have shown that students
        become less religious as they proceed through college, probably in
        part because average IQ rises.

        All but four of the forty-three polls I have reviewed support
        the conclusion that native intelligence varies inversely with
        degree of religious faith; i.e., that, other factors being equal,
        the more intelligent a person is, the less religious he is.  It
        is easy to find fault with the studies I have reviewed, for all
        were imperfect.  But the fact that all but four of them
        supported the general conclusion provides overwhelming evidence
        that, among American students and adults, the amount of religious
        faith tends to vary inversely and appreciably with intelligence."







[ 本帖最後由 dye 於 2007-10-6 10:40 編輯 ]

回復 11# 的帖子

When something like this is still there:
http://news.nationalgeographic.c ... ience_religion.html

they will ask me to explain the "more intelligent a person is, the less religious he is." theory. And I don't know how.
de omnibus dubitandum
Instead of asking one, try asking many?

http://www.lhup.edu/~DSIMANEK/sci_relig.htm

"Disbelief in God and immortality among NAS biological scientists was 65.2% and 69.0%, respectively, and among NAS physical scientists it was 79.0% and 76.3%. Most of the rest were agnostics on both issues, with few believers. We found the highest percentage of belief among NAS mathematicians (14.3% in God, 15.0% in immortality). Biological scientists had the lowest rate of belief (5.5% in God, 7.1% in immortality), with physicists and astronomers slightly higher (7.5% in God, 7.5% in immortality). "

http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html

You've got to wonder somethimes:  Is it an accident that Bush get a D in astronomy?

[ 本帖最後由 dye 於 2007-10-6 11:03 編輯 ]
they will still ask why some scientists are stupid.
de omnibus dubitandum
Dear Sherman,

Variance?  Perhaps they really need the following from you?





[ 本帖最後由 dye 於 2007-10-6 11:06 編輯 ]
you better tell me, buddy
de omnibus dubitandum
Sherman,

You don't need me to tell you.  Search and you shall find!  If Benjamin can solve the God as lightning problem with a rod, you can solve this mystery.



[Hint] Richard Dawkin's <<The God Delusion>> did give a hint in this matter.[/hint]

[ 本帖最後由 dye 於 2007-10-6 11:22 編輯 ]
原帖由 沙文 於 2007-10-5 04:39 發表
[url=http://carcosa.net/jason/blog_images/2007/06/18/god_is_angry_2007-06-18-17-30.jpg
http://carcosa.net/jason/blog_images/2007/06/18/god_is_angry_2007-06-18-17-30.jpg[/quote[/url]]


按文理:

GOD IS ANGRY

GOD IS HOMOSEUALITY

GOD IS ABOTION

GOD IS BEMOCRATS

GOD IS ...

不過講到 BEMOCRATS 就有的怪!

又政教不分?共和鬼?布什鬼?哇哈哈!
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個