返回列表 回覆 發帖

[數據資料] 基督教涉嫌的二次創作 / 抄襲

Matt 13:24 耶穌又設個比喻對他們說、天國好像人撒好種在田裡.
及至人睡覺的時候、有仇敵來、將稗子撒在麥子裡、就走了。
到長苗吐穗的時候、稗子也顯出來。
田主的僕人來告訴他說、主阿、你不是撒好種在田裡麼、從那裡來的稗子呢。
主人說、這是仇敵作的。僕人說、你要我們去薅出來麼。
主人說、不必、恐怕薅稗子、連麥子也拔出來。
容這兩樣一齊長、等著收割.當收割的時候、我要對收割的人說、先將稗子薅出來、捆成捆、留著燒.惟有麥子、要收在倉裡。

《大寶積經卷第一百一十三》
迦葉。是名沙門求利。迦葉。云何稗沙門。迦葉。
譬如麥田中生稗麥。其形似麥不可分別。
爾時田夫作如是念。謂此稗麥盡是好麥。
後見穟生爾乃知非。不得名言一切是麥。迦葉。
如是稗沙門在於眾中。似是持戒有德行者。
施主見時謂盡是沙門。
而彼癡人實非沙門言是沙門。非梵行人自言梵行。
先來敗壞離於持戒。亦不入眾數。
於佛法中無智慧命當墮惡道。猶如稗麥在好麥中。
爾時天龍鬼神有天眼者。見彼癡人墮於地獄。
見已各相謂言。此是癡人先似沙門行不善法。
今當墮於大地獄中。
從今已後終不能得沙門德行及沙門果。猶如稗麥在好麥中。迦葉
http://www.cbeta.org/result/normal/T11/0310_113.htm
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
回覆 5# 抽刀斷水

according to wiki, 上座部佛教話《大寶積經》起源於大眾部(大乘佛教的前身)的分支制多部,屬南傳佛教經典, 即是大概在2nd 結集之後, 400BCE左右


History[edit]
According to the Nikāyasaṅgraha (a Theravādin text), the Ratnakūṭa Sūtra was composed by the "Andhakas", meaning the Mahāsāṃghika Caitika schools of the Āndhra region.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma ... 1%B9%ADa_S%C5%ABtra
回覆 8# 抽刀斷水

公元前2世紀孔雀王朝曾有佛教團在埃及希臘及中東等地傳教, 所以猶太佬係有可能接觸過《大寶積經》

    https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E ... 4.E6.8E.A5.E8.A7.B8
Jhn 1.1         In the beginning was the Word,  
Gen 1.1        In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

約翰哭音的beginning 同創世紀的beginning分別譯為"太初", "起初"

Jhn 1.1 太初有道,道与神同在
Gen 起初神創造天地 。

「太初」乃是道家術語, 被基督教盜用:

《太上老君开天经》混元之时,混元一治万劫,至于百成,百成亦八十一万年,而有太初。
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
我細路仔個陣抄作文都係用基督教嘅辦法 - 抄一部份, 而其餘就專登同被抄材料不同

當先生發現我抄, 就有同学仔拍心口負責話「人有智愚賢庸」, 指出兩文之不同處, 幫我証明絕非抄襲。這個辦法幾好使, 通常都會有人中計, 將來有人發放沙文抄作文資料,佢可以告訴發放者那些資料不可靠。
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
基徒以为泠门就唔多覺嘛
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
回覆 32# beebeechan
同学们作文唔会好似您口甘渣口既卦?
十年前嘅巨著資料就梗係舊啦,不能一本通書睼到老咖嘛
樓主都冇話上述資料已被證實, 佢提出一個可能性,唔得咩?
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
回覆 43# beebeechan
您係左搬定右貼還是中間quote呀?

"文中打後便一一列出理據:
In general, the derivation of the virgin birth from pagan mythology through the medium of Gentile Christians implies several inexplicable difficulties:

    Why should the Christian recently converted from paganism revert to his pagan superstitions in his conception of Christian doctrines?
    How could the product of pagan thought find its way among Jewish Christians without leaving as much as a vestige of opposition on the part of the Jewish Christians?
    How could this importation into Jewish Christianity be effected at an age early enough to produce the Jewish Christian sources from which either the Evangelists or the interpolators of the Gospels derived their material?
    Why did not the relatives of Christ's parents protest against the novel views concerning Christ's origin?"
這是難以證實或證偽

抽刀斷水 發表於 2016/1/6 06:23

就係恰您難以證實或證偽, 所以猶太佬唔怕抄

若然容易證實或證偽, 佢地就唔會抄啦老襯
為熱烈預祝蛙島立法會拉布失敗,即將立法通過《2014年版權(修訂)條例草案》
抽刀斷水 發表於 2015/12/27 22:42


喂唔夠人喎, 您有冇點過人數先出帖咖?
猶太佬二次創作之源, 除了抄埃及佬之外, 其實, 成套古希伯來文都係抄番泥嘅
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleo-Hebrew_alphabet

二次創作/ 抄襲根本就係佢地嘅優良文化傳統
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
回覆 60# beebeechan

古時古日猶太佬以抄下文便是
博學才多了。

不管明, 只管抄
回覆 63# beebeechan
我見猶太佬抄都有人信, 咁就費卵事自己作啦
回覆 65# 抽刀斷水
主席我要求點人數
這是難以證實或證偽

(1) 說解釋太大膽和擔心朋友走向懸崖,這兩 ...
抽刀斷水 發表於 2016/1/6 06:23

若然當事人唔係鬼拍後尾枕, 冇人可以證明stat wars係抄黑澤明嘅.
所以此類案件要求證實或證偽其實甚為戇居, 猶太佬唔抄就笨

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story ... tar-wars-stole-from
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
季羡林:佛家的弥勒佛就是基督教的弥赛亚
http://www.360doc.com/content/13/0625/08/3917391_295333531.shtml
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
再加埋這本就應該係95%齊
http://files.meetup.com/284333/Pagan%20Origins%20of%20the%20Christ%20Myth.pdf

季羡林的一篇4%
小弟的大寶積經1%
咁齊哂未?
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個