weakest

1. Conflicts between some scientists (on some unsolved issues in science) means that 進化論 is not reliable??

2. Tautology: "世界末日鐘臨到之時，即使假設太陽是否仍然存在，全人類都會滅亡". If it is not the case that "全人類都會滅亡", would we call this "世界末日"? (If there is "世界末日"...)

3. Why I can't see the proof for "科學實驗例證來證明地球是由造物主創造"?

weakest

回復 4# Guest from 220.246.239.x

耐到連我都差d唔記得有這reply 了^^
對於遊客220.xxx...的reply, 我要講的, 原文該句與廢話無異...
至於如果是科學, 卻只是Tautology, 那才不合科學原則. 原文不愛討論科學, 卻扮科學. 如果那一系列的文都是同一人寫的, 我認為那人的人格極有問題.
反正, 推一推, 能夠令該獻醜的獻醜, 何樂而不為?