「太好啦！我也是浸信會，你是Baptist Church of God還是Baptist Church of the
「Baptist Church of God. 」
「真是太奇妙啦！我也是，那你是原教旨的Baptist Church of God還是改革派的？
5. 這是半說笑的...事實上, 在平日招攬教徒時, 不同教派都是"they are the same, all are 導人向善". 亦會不分教派地得到好處(人家會認為基督徒的品格良好, 不然, 為何"是基督徒"經常是法庭上的求情理由??而且, 在工作/學業上, 基督徒亦不分教派地佔優). 但有問題時, 總會聽到"這只是XX異端的所作所為而已", "這只是XXX的個人問題, 並不能代表所有的基督徒"的言論, 平時的"all are the same"不知跑到那了...我不是他們, 並不能確實知道是否所有教派的權力份子有意狼狽為奸, 但我不能排除這可能性(因此不是全說笑的...). 而且, 太多上述例子令我覺得這可能是真的.
I am not sure about the others. I am only against non-sesnse. Christianity just happened to be one of them
Ofcourse I know there are million sect of Christianity. Some are more harmful, some are less. Ofcourse I notice that those that prevent their children from getting a blood transfusion are more harmful than the most liberal type that even allow gay marriage.
However, you must also note that instead of reading only from the mainstream church about other sect, you may try to read from the "other sect" themselves about what they believe. You may find quickly that the other sect follow more strictly to bible teaching, or perhaps they are just equally valid in their understanding of the Bible. (God maybe perfect, but human who read it and interpret it are not. You can never be quite sure if what you understand is correct until you demonstrate it by observable evidence)
If you dwell deeper into observable evidence, you will find that they are all bullshit. It does not matter which sect, it has the same root. It is based on an outdated cruel myth by some nomadic fellow in the case of Christianity.
The real challenge is: Are you going to spend the time and effort to dwell on the evidence around it? Or you prefer to be spoon feeded with illusion? Do you take the red pill? Or the blue pill?