返回列表 回覆 發帖

轉移視線千四宗投訴《聖經》

咁我攬上身,我承認幕後黑手就係我。有咩衝著本將軍來罷!

沙某之所以有咁高尚的人格,都係因為《聖經》流傳已久,屬文化一部分,我既言行源自《聖經》,難以與不雅及淫褻混為一談。

係呢,兄呀,我本來唔知父女相姦原來是文化一部份。最衰我冇女,您有冇呀?

[ 本帖最後由 沙文 於 2007-5-16 20:02 編輯 ]
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details

回復 #4 M2 的帖子

no problem. 只要佢地肯來
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2007-5-18 10:47 發表
路透社都有報道喎。 (而且佢完全無提及中大報事件,不像某些愛抄作的傳媒把兩者混為一談。)

The Web site said the Bible's sexual content "far exceeds" that of arecent sex column published in the Chinese University's "Student Press"magazine, which had asked readers whether they'd ever fantasised aboutincest or bestiality.

That column was later deemed "indecent" by the Obscene ArticlesTribunal, sparking a storm of debate about social morality and freedomof speech. Student editors of the journal defended it, saying opensexual debate was a basic right.
咁又唔係完全冇茄
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個