返回列表 回覆 發帖

抗議無線電視翡翠台在黃金時間播放《福言雋語》!

原帖由 Guest from 60.48.212.x 於 2008-2-28 23:12 發表
“疑似”  有間電視臺將變身福音電視臺事件


教堂重新建成更大更宏偉(完全唔似係佈景)
近幾年黎幾乎每部 清朝/民國 劇集例必會出現 ﹐時裝都唔少
一部劇集真係咁需要出現 教堂 既情節嗎 ﹖
一定要出現 ﹖唔出唔得 ﹖﹖
到底 ...


first ThANKs2Guest from 60.48.212.x ,

pieta to those shareholders of tvb[[[[[0511@hkstocksExchange]]]] ,

i feel myself more-n-more lucky in that i have n'ever really bought any share of tvb ,

once up on a time , i did incline myself to buy its share just too much

cheers ThANKye again

[ 本帖最後由 prussianz 於 2008-2-29 15:19 編輯 ]
原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-2-29 17:23 發表


M$的確代表Microsoft,

其實呢,我個人就不是特別喜歡M$的
但問題是當年M$將HQ轉移,是代表著旗下和周邊開發商的聚集
結果趕走了M$,其他大廠亦不敢駐足。

這個道理很簡單,就正如你再討厭Intel,都一樣會買Core Duo 2 ...


ThANKye
sorry ThANKye , hk missed 'the tech boat again ,

原帖由 dye 於 2008-2-28 10:02 發表 [url=redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=14589&ptid=1504][/url]
HK government is "trying" to turn HK into a city relying on 3 main service industry
a) Financial service (THe talk about the Islamic fund, for example)
b) Tourism (Hotel tax cut, and giving out land to the industry)
c) Logistic service (New harbour, new bridge, cutting tax on alcohol beverage)

d) (Domestic service like the local supermarket)


sorry in dis-agreement here ,
----------------------------------------------------------------
.1. 'the Logistic pillar 's been being crippled by those ports in ......... shenzhen , zhuhai , e.t.c.
----------------------------------------------------------------
.2.
if ..... some-sars-like virus hit hk again , then .... all 'the 4 pillars including 股+would all tumble instantly
---------
that would b the reason for why hk
should need 高地價政策 to raise enough $$$$$$$$$ for 投放落去研究 ,
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
原帖由 訪客得得b 於 2008-2-28 17:44 發表 [url=redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=14622&ptid=1504][/url]

偉大的港燦人民政府京委書記於上台時說過:香港要迎接黄金十年。我聽後頓悟,知道炒樓炒股的時候到了。皆因此人半生殖民地公務員,過去本港股樓升,匯豐,怡和等大機構就會加人工比伙計,公務員人工福利亦會跟隨薪金調查機制而上升,正所謂人的智慧必然跟他的自身經驗掛勾,在這種思維主導下,我睇死佢會搞熱市帶動經濟上升的。

原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-2-27 12:27 發表
>>>>>>>>>> 郭氏兄弟就歡歡喜喜的在政府上拿走八億萬去建方舟公園,而且由郭氏營運。

>not 郭氏兄弟 donating out their own 八億 去建 方舟公園 ?

正確,個公園是政府出資的。

>>>>> 97後前五年對於商家的鎮壓,
...


first ThANKs

---------

o come on God , ye got me ,

政府出資 = all tax-payers 出資 = i have a $hare in 出資 = each-n-every-of-ye have a $hare in 出資

o my dear tax $ !!!!!!!!!
o my dear $ !!!!!!!!!

what ?????????
i dont eat ,
i dont sleep , in order to squeeze out my tax $ ,
but ,
my $ have a share in support of the religion which i detest most ?????????
my $ have a share in support of the 邪教 ?????????

have they asked me or our [[so-called]] people's representative ?????????

our government 's reallly forcing me to dodge away from paying tax !!!!!!!!!

each-n-every-of-ye have a $hare in 出資 to support the 邪教 !!!!!!!!!

'r ye happy ?????????


'r ye happy enough by now ?????????


'ThANKye'







[ 本帖最後由 prussianz 於 2008-3-1 09:01 編輯 ]
原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-2-27 12:27 發表
>>>>>>>>>> 郭氏兄弟就歡歡喜喜的在政府上拿走八億萬去建方舟公園,而且由郭氏營運。

>not 郭氏兄弟 donating out their own 八億 去建 方舟公園 ?

正確,整個公園是政府出資的。

>>>>> 97後前五年對於商家的鎮壓,
...


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not 郭氏兄弟 donating out their own 八億 去建 方舟公園 ?
>>>>>>>>> 正確,整個公園是政府出資的。
---------
-------------------------------------------------------

.1. this $$$$$$$$$
八億
----------------------------------------------------------------


原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-2-27 12:27 發表
>>>>>>>>>> 郭氏兄弟就歡歡喜喜的在政府上拿走八億萬去建方舟公園,而且由郭氏營運。

>not 郭氏兄弟 donating out their own 八億 去建 方舟公園 ?

正確,整個公園是政府出資的。

>>>>> 97後前五年對於商家的鎮壓,
...


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not 郭氏兄弟 donating out their own 八億 去建 方舟公園 ?
>>>>>>>>> 正確,整個公園是政府出資的。
---------
-------------------------------------------------------
.1. this $$$$$$$$$
八億
----------------------------------------------------------------
.2. then ..... an other ....
http://hk.geocities.com/anti_ark/
>>>> 貴公司曾因承諾興建公園以換取政府減免地價有八億之多,
>>>> 則此事已非單純貴公司事務,
一般巿民亦有權利監察事件
thence ,
八億 + 八億 = 16億 ?????????
----------------------------------------------------------------
cheers ThANKye
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------



原帖由 weakest 於 2008-2-27 17:57 發表
當時我仲唔覺有呢單新聞tim...其實呢個公園起成點ka? 無聽到有關消息...

回復 123#  Nomad 的帖子
I think introducing anti-trust law is good (and may not necessary out of the religious consideration). Howe ...


>>>>>>>>> 當時我仲唔覺有呢單新聞tim...其實呢個公園起成點ka? 無聽到有關消息...

me 2 !!!!!!!!!
me too !!!!!!!!!
i do simply have forgotten it completly
completely

how comes there's not any noise ?????????
how comes they do have been 100.000.000% successfully managed out there's not any noise ?
not any noise for so many years ?????????
http://hk.geocities.com/anti_ark/
1997起籌備發展的馬灣主題公園

in these years, i have been always turning on my financial radio , 24 x 7 x 366 ,
but ,
i swear God : :::::::::: i did
無聽到有關消息...
just until now ,
just until here ,
just until these few days ,

where's 'the public consultation/////////audittation ?????????
where's our ledgco ?????????
where's our press ?????????
where's our public media ?????????

ThANKs to My Dear Sir Nomad + My Dear Sir 刀 4 ungraving up 'the issue


[ 本帖最後由 prussianz 於 2008-3-1 09:36 編輯 ]
原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-2-27 12:27 發表
>>>>>>>>>> 郭氏兄弟就歡歡喜喜的在政府上拿走八億萬去建方舟公園,而且由郭氏營運。

>not 郭氏兄弟 donating out their own 八億 去建 方舟公園 ?

正確,整個公園是政府出資的。

>>>>> 97後前五年對於商家的鎮壓,
...


i'm not [[[[[only]]]] to go against 謊舟主題公園 ,

my point's that : ::::::::::
if ..... they do it , then .... please do it on their own budget ,

our hkgov ,
not religion-neutral ?????????
not active-non-interference ????????? lying again ?????????
原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-2-27 12:27 發表
>>>>>>>>>> 郭氏兄弟就歡歡喜喜的在政府上拿走八億萬去建方舟公園,而且由郭氏營運。

>not 郭氏兄弟 donating out their own 八億 去建 方舟公園 ?

正確,整個公園是政府出資的。

>>>>> 97後前五年對於商家的鎮壓,
...


>>>>>>>>> 刀不出鞘才是劍術最高的境界

o yes
o k
o k i know i know , @t least currently , 刀不出鞘 's really the best4me this very busynessman ,
but ,
when-ever ..... i see something such as following : ::::::::::
http://www.keyhk.com/cgi-bin/guestbook/view.cgi?id=88947 [[[[[[簽名支持anti_ark]]]]
>>>> 林某人 於2007-10-11 23:22:22的留言:                          
>>>> 假如閣下要求發展商停建挪亞方舟公園,請先要求政府拆除昂坪市集吧
then .... i'm toast,

then .... my long-times 不出鞘的 刀 .........



[ 本帖最後由 prussianz 於 2008-3-1 09:53 編輯 ]
原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-3-1 12:17 發表
昂坪市集上面要是四處是甚麼佛教研討會,佛教生命研究中心,blablabla的話
大概我都會反對政府出錢。

>>>> 假如閣下要求發展商停建挪亞方舟公園,請先要求政府拆除昂坪市集吧。

沒人去反對他建 - 反對的是他們用政府錢建,而且內裡全是基督教專用的設施
還有,天壇大佛印象中是佛教徒自己出錢建的(而且秏資不足是次撥款十分之一) ...


卑鄙无耻 的 shk

卑鄙无耻 的
原帖由 weakest 於 2008-2-27 17:57 發表
當時我仲唔覺有呢單新聞tim...其實呢個公園起成點ka? 無聽到有關消息...

回復 123#  Nomad 的帖子
I think introducing anti-trust law is good (and may not necessary out of the religious consideration). Howe ...


i swear , me too ,

i thought that would be due to that project being starved off because of n'o funding from its beginning

i did really not know their tacit tactic this time
原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-3-1 12:17 發表
昂坪市集上面要是四處是甚麼佛教研討會,佛教生命研究中心,blablabla的話
大概我都會反對政府出錢。

>>>> 假如閣下要求發展商停建挪亞方舟公園,請先要求政府拆除昂坪市集吧。


沒人去反對他建 - 反對的是他們用政府錢建,而且內裡全是基督教專用的設施
還有,天壇大佛印象中是佛教徒自己出錢建的(而且秏資不足是次撥款十分之一)...


o k i cant help but must oust that's an/////a////A alternative form of legallised mis-appropriation ,

its really hard4me2swallow the pill this time ,
because : ::::::::::
they'r exploiting my tax-$ to have a share in building up that 謊舟
which must b used to poison other chineses ,

i must think twice-n-thrice b4 i pay any further tax to the current Christians-dominated-hkgovernment
原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-3-1 12:17 發表
昂坪市集上面要是四處是甚麼佛教研討會,佛教生命研究中心,blablabla的話
大概我都會反對政府出錢。
>>>> 假如閣下要求發展商停建挪亞方舟公園,請先要求政府拆除昂坪市集吧。

沒人去反對他建 - 反對的是他們用政府錢建,而且內裡全是基督教專用的設施
還有,天壇大佛印象中是佛教徒自己出錢建的(而且秏資不足是次撥款十分之一)


>>>>>>>>> 刀不出鞘才是劍術最高的境界

their tacit tactics won again this time ,

their tacit tactics this time , may b quite like to `````刀不出鞘才是劍術最高的境界'''' in 1 way or an other

their tacit tactics this time , may endorse2prove out
that
thy theory `````````刀不出鞘才是劍術最高的境界''''''''' may b much more realer than their Bible's ,,,,,truth''''
;;--^)


原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-3-1 12:17 發表
昂坪市集上面要是四處是甚麼佛教研討會,佛教生命研究中心,blablabla的話
大概我都會反對政府出錢。

>>>> 假如閣下要求發展商停建挪亞方舟公園,請先要求政府拆除昂坪市集吧。
沒人去反對他建 - 反對的是他們用政府錢建,而且內裡全是基督教專用的設施
還有,天壇大佛印象中是佛教徒自己出錢建的(而且秏資不足是次撥款十分之一).


>>>>>>>>> ,天壇大佛印象中是佛教徒自己出錢建的

confirmed

+
Christiannity 's much richer than buddhism ,
whose total amout of gross financial resources , may b even under 十分之一 of that of Christiannity ,
there4 ,
those Christians , expecially those of shk , must/////MUST have moe-than-enough resources
to finance out any project , 自己出錢 to 建

i did really b un-able to anticipate that
shk could b so 卑鄙无耻 ,
原帖由 Nomad 於 2008-3-1 12:19 發表


我不記得香港政府說過他們的政教分離的
(實際上基本法在英國人的影響下的確沒有政教分離和確立個人信仰自由的條文)
但是卻有一條『保障』教會在九七之後享有所有九七前的政府利益(錢,政治支援)。 ...


since that whole project 's almost accomplished ,
there4 ,
o k , it's pointless2prevent them from building it .........

refund !!卑鄙无耻 的 shk
原帖由 weakest 於 2008-2-27 17:57 發表
當時我仲唔覺有呢單新聞tim...其實呢個公園起成點ka? 無聽到有關消息...

回復 123#  Nomad 的帖子
I think introducing anti-trust law is good (and may not necessary out of the religious consideration). Howe ...


couldest thou or any1 else
please teach me whether the Christiannity prevent the establishment of 慈雲山's
statue of avalokiteshvara-guan-yin ??

cheers ThANKye
原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2008-2-14 09:58 發表
陳志雲是天主教徒,樂易玲是基督教徒,估計他們應該互相指責對方為異端,不會合作的。


a concrete proof 4 co-operation between 天主教 n 基督教 : ::::::::::
http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=pZ9IKQx7JgsC&pg=PA62&lpg=PA62&dq=gambling+catholic+protestant+%22co+operation%22&source=web&ots=bzDd6hfgG6&sig=Hns_iISfcrbOMs_jbnBvZeRdCRI&hl=en
[[[[[[[[[ 'the search phrase : ::::: ````````` gambling catholic protestant "co operation" ''''''''' ]]]]]]]]]
[[[[[[[[[ page 62 ]]]]]]]]]
[[[[[[[[[ just scroll down there ]]]]]]]]]

[[[[[[[[[ 'the book's name : ::::: Wanna Bet?: Winners and Losers in Gambling's Luck ]]]]]]]]]

[[[[[[[[[ today : ::::: 4th march 2008 ]]]]]]]]]
>>>> in
>>>> 1995
[[.....]]
[[.....]]
>>>> over gambling,
>>>> the Catholic and Protestant churches
>>>> now work together on this issue.
[[.....]]
[[.....]]
>>>> that has brought two age-old rivals together.
>>>> Besides the Catholic and Protestant cooperation,

by 'the way ,
'the mainland of our motherland china ,
'the 1.4 billions pop market ,
'the common target ,
'the common interrest$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

[ 本帖最後由 prussianz 於 2008-3-4 18:37 編輯 ]
原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2008-2-14 09:58 發表
陳志雲是天主教徒,樂易玲是基督教徒,估計他們應該互相指責對方為異端,不會合作的。


something more supporting my allegating the [[[[[[[[[invisible]]]]]]]]] co-operation
twixt 天主教徒 n 基督教徒

http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_caev.htm
>>>> COOPERATION BETWEENROMAN CATHOLICS AND CONSERVATIVE PROTESTANT
S
[[.....]]
[[.....]]
Charles ColsonChuck Colson was an aide to Richard Nixon's presidency [[[[[[[[[USA]]]]]]]]] during the times of theWatergate scandal. After being released from prison, Colson formed Prison Fellowship,an Evangelical Christian outreach to convicts. He has been perhaps the most activeEvangelical Christian in the promotion of Roman Catholic-Evangelical cooperation. He wrotethe foreword to Kieth Fournier's book: "Evangelical Catholics," inwhich he stated:
  "...those who are called of God, whether Catholic or Protestant, are part of  the same Body. What they share is a belief in the basics: the virgin birth, the deity of  Christ, His bodily resurrection, His imminent return, and the authority of His infallible  Word. They also share the same mission: presenting Christ as Savior and Lord to a needy  world. Those who hold to these truths and act on this commission are evangelical  Christians. … It's high time that all of us who are Christians come together  regardless of the difference of our confessions and our traditions and make common cause  to bring Christian values to bear in our society. When the barbarians are scaling the  walls, there is no time for petty quarreling in the camp [[[[[[[[[ barbarians ......... mmmmmmmmm , such as : ::::: exchristian.hk ]]]]]]]]];;--^)
.... We have much to forgive, much  to relearn. But Evangelical Catholics can help us do both so we can band together against  the rising tides of secularism which threaten to engulf us
."   1


[[.....]]
[[.....]]
Billy Graham

Billy Graham is perhaps the best known and loved conservative Christian evangelist in North America. He has long been involved in a close working relationship with the Roman Catholic church. He is perhaps the most influential Protestant involved in the Catholic-Evangelical ecumenical movement: 2   
In 1964, after a meeting with Richard Cardinal Cushing, Archbishop of Boston, Mr. Graham    said: "I feel much closer to Roman Catholic tradition than    to some of the more liberal Protestants."
in 1967, he received an honorary degree from a Roman Catholic institution: Belmont    Abbey.
In 1979, he recognized Pope John Paul II as "the moral    leader of the world."
In 1981, during an interview in Christianity Today, he    said that one of the most significant changes in Christendom over the previous 25 years    was "...the new understanding between Roman Catholics and Protestants. Twenty-five    years ago we could hardly speak with each other openly. In our Crusades today, thousands    of Catholics feel free to attend. I have preached in Roman Catholic schools, and have even    received honorary doctorates from them. this could not have happened 25 years ago."      3
In 1981, he met the pope for the first time, and was the first Protestant to                 ever speak at    the North American College, a seminary for students from North America at the    Vatican.
In 1983, he advised President Reagan in the decision to establish formal diplomatic    relations with the Vatican.
In 1990, Dr Graham met with the pope, to discuss Eastern Europe and relations between    Evangelicals and Roman Catholics worldwide.
Billy Graham's team generally seeks the cooperation of both Protestant and Roman    Catholic churches in those urban areas where they have conducted recent campaigns.
Roman Catholics who make a decision for Christ at his meetings are referred back to    counselors at their diocese.
        

Activities by other Evangelical Leaders:      
               
Promise Keepers, the leading    Evangelical Christian men's organization in the United States calls on individuals in all    Christian groups to "tear down all denominational barriers" and join    together in committing their lives to Jesus.
Jack van Impe is arguably the leading Evangelical    teleministry devoted to end-times prophecy. He frequently refers to the Roman Catholic    church in a positive context on his weekly program.
Robert Schuller, promoter of "Possibility Thinking"    also refers to Catholicism positively in his TV program.
The Charismatic movement straddles both Protestantism and    Catholicism. At "The North American Congress on the Holy Spirit and World    Evangelization" in 1987, 40,000 Charismatic Christians met. Present were Roman    Catholics, Evangelicals, and Mainline Christians. The Catholic contingent was the largest    of any denomination.



in want of something more , please dont hesitate2let me 2 get it

[ 本帖最後由 prussianz 於 2008-3-4 19:38 編輯 ]
原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2008-4-16 21:25 發表
來自三基魔仔的報料:

節錄自 71台節目:
41:45~~42:46
http://www.radio71.hk/content/taiping/2008/20080415taiping_mono.mp3

Q仔爆料,郭氏建方舟,已向政府收了 8憶資助,還向教友呼籲捐錢,賺到笑,方舟仍未動工誰說耶神不會管理錢,郭氏真實見証,感恩恩


2////to 基教


:讚::讚:2////to Q仔

:讚:2////to thee ,

[ 本帖最後由 prussianz 於 2008-4-17 02:52 編輯 ]
exChristian.info前基督徒,主力:淚儿/泪儿,WEIYAN,龙井树。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。警告 基督徒:你们一定不够他们玩
realChristianities.com雪龙坛
原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2008-2-14 09:58 發表
陳志雲是天主教徒,樂易玲是基督教徒,估計他們應該互相指責對方為異端,不會合作的。


天主教 基督教 合作 ======>>>> 再次眼前g例子
|
|
v

http://exchristian.hk/forum/viewthread.php?tid=1512&page=1#pid18566
原帖由 旁觀者 於 2008-4-30 13:17 發表 http://exchristian.hk/forum/viewthread.php?tid=1512&page=1#pid18566
身有屎,怕自己成為規管對象:
        「(六月一日)當時,香港天主教教區、香港基督教協進會、基督徒團體和人權組織紛紛公開表示,香港無需就邪教立法,更沒有必要立法規管宗教,以免影響宗教自由。 ...」
www.hkjp.org/feedback/ ...


http://exchristian.hk/forum/viewthread.php?tid=1512&page=1#pid18576


原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2008-4-30 18:54 發表

那是「香港天主教正義和平委員會」的網址:
[[.....]]
[[.....]]
邀請簽名反對訂定《反邪教法》
[[.....]]
[[.....]]
發起團體:
香港天主教正義和平委員會.香港基督徒學會.香港天主教勞工事務委員會.

香港基督教工業委員會. 香港天主教大專聯會.基督徒關懷香港學會.香港婦女基督徒協會.

教會工作者協會.基督徒學生運動

危害宗教自由  反對訂定<反邪教法>

[ 本帖最後由 prussianz 於 2008-5-1 09:45 編輯 ]
exChristian.info前基督徒,主力:淚儿/泪儿,WEIYAN,龙井树。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。警告 基督徒:你们一定不够他们玩
realChristianities.com雪龙坛
原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2008-2-14 09:58 發表
陳志雲是天主教徒,樂易玲是基督教徒,估計他們應該互相指責對方為異端,不會合作的。


天主教 基督教 合作 ======>>>> 再次眼前g例子
|
|
v
[[[[[ThANKs-to-the-author-旁觀者]]]]
http://exchristian.hk/forum/viewthread.php?tid=2017&page=2#pid21123
[[[[[《祈理魁神父傳・譯者序》http://www.cclw.net/book/qlksfz/index.html?]]]]
天主教「以世界和平為由而進行宗教大合一」,是有它的陰謀,請看它的主內兄弟怎樣篤爆它的畫皮:
        「雖然今天的天主教可能在告解禮上不再那麼仔細地問及女信徒的性生活,也讓信徒有更多的讀經權利,又為『教會合一運動』的大目標而准許天主教徒與福音派基督徒接觸,但是,今天的天主教在信條上,在神學思想上,可以說是完全沒有改善的。如果有人認為天主教已經改善了許多,他們一定被欺騙了。
  從屬靈的角度來看,譯者認為上帝從天主教中保全了像祈理魁這樣的見證人,目的就是要上帝的眾教會和屬祂的人儆醒,不要上天主教的當,不要與他們聯合。環觀今天普世教會,自從新神學派的總部『世界基督教協進會』在本世紀初主動提出與天主教進行合一之後,天主教更在一九六二年至一九六五年舉行第二次梵蒂崗會議,全面推行『大合一運動』。接著在一九六六年至一九六九年間,基督教的靈恩運動更滲入到天主教的基層,並且在短短的幾年間,發展成為世界性的天主教『靈恩更新運動』,此後,天主教、基督教協進會、靈恩派教會、東正教,接二連三地舉行世界性的大型合一會議。到一九九零以後,連基督教向來稱為保守,信仰純正的福音眾多世界著名領袖均與天主教簽署合一宣言。這些福音派領袖雖然聲稱仍然不贊成天主教的信仰,但卻大大影響整個基督教界傾向天主教。葛培理的佈道團,以及許多神學院所熱切教導的『靈修神學』更為嚴重筆者親眼看見基督教有不少神學院請天主教神父回來教神學;基督教不少屬靈書室,印刷和售賣天主教的書籍,達到有史以來最高點,甚至有一個時期,比基督教本身所售賣的書更多!為了抗衡這種『大合一運動』的趨勢,筆者認為本書是非常值得推介的。讀者從一個在天主教裏生活了五十年的神父口中,可以得到第一手的資料,明白天主教的真相,醒察她是否值得我們與之聯合。」《祈理魁神父傳・譯者序》
http://www.cclw.net/book/qlksfz/index.html?


[[[[[ThANKs-to-the-author-旁觀者]]]] again
exChristian.info前基督徒,主力:淚儿/泪儿,WEIYAN,龙井树。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。警告 基督徒:你们一定不够他们玩
realChristianities.com雪龙坛
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個