666 咁鐘意引維基(仲要好似以為人地冇睇過),點解維基Horus編話復活Osirus係Isis,666又話係Horus?Jesus_Christ_in_comparative_mythology編又話Most contemporary Egyptologists believe these parallels are not true and are pseudo-scientific.[13][14][15][16][17][18]666又置若罔聞?選擇性資料閱讀,和閣下口中基基一模一樣。
Mat 7:1 「你們不要論斷人,免得你們被論斷。
Mat 7:2 因為你們怎樣論斷人,也必怎樣被論斷;你們用什麼量器量給人,也必用什麼量器量給你們。
Mat 7:3 為什麼看見你弟兄眼中有刺,卻不想自己眼中有梁木呢?
Mat 7:4 你自己眼中有梁木,怎能對你弟兄說:『容我去掉你眼中的刺』呢?
Mat 7:5 你這假冒為善的人!先去掉自己眼中的梁木,然後才能看得清楚,去掉你弟兄眼中的刺。
Wiki:
Horus was born to the goddess Isis after she retrieved all the dismembered body parts of her murdered husband Osiris, except his penis which was thrown into the Nile and eaten by a catfish,[6][7]
就是錯的,你引的資料貼文就是對的
One theory finds similarities between the Egyptian god Horus and Jesus. Writer Gerald Massey argued that the deity of Horus and Jesus shared identical mythological origins in his 1907 book Ancient Egypt, the light of the world.[12] Most contemporary Egyptologists believe these parallels are not true and are pseudo-scientific.[13][14][15][16][17][18]
就是錯的
W. Ward Gasque conducted a world-wide poll of twenty leading Egyptologists to verify if there was any academic support for these claims. The scholars were unanimous in dismissing the claimed parallels.
就是錯的
你現在自己說不會「維基資料選擇性資料援引」,那麼
1. 你發現維基支持「袁崇煥書生亦人材」時,為何引維基?
2. 我指出維基Horus篇說是Isis復活Horus老爸,不是Horus復活Horus老爸,你為什麼又不回答?又貼其他資料?
3. 維基comparitive mythology篇說 Although considered fringe pseudo-science, Massey's views have nonetheless been repeated...[20][21][22][23],你為何又扭曲成「維基支持的資料」?
我沒有說過袁崇煥只是書生,我說
1. 維基支持你,你就引
我沒說過沒有資料說Horus復活他老爸,我說
2. 維基不支持你,你就不引
你懂英文不懂?Nonetheless, views have been been repeated by話雖如此,還是有人重覆論述他的觀點。曾參老母嗎?多說幾次就是真的?同一句,前一個phrase :Although considered fringe pseudo-science你又不引?維基都要斷章取義?還是你不懂英文?
3. 維基講中性的事件,你就曲解成支持自己的證據
你拿的『phrase :Although considered fringe pseudo-science』論點,有任何証據嗎,
666 發表於 2012/4/17 12:22
2。有人重覆論述他的觀點,也就正是代表支持他的觀點,不然是什麼,就是曾參老母嗎?真是笑話!
你自己的3,反對自己的2,有證據證明,被別人重覆了的說話,就是scientific?
維基話"although considered fringe pseudo-scientific",你就反對,指維基冇證據,然後後維基話袁崇煥又書生又軍事人材,你就讚成,覺得人地好有證據!咪正正係選擇性維基閱讀囉。
Horus was born to the goddess Isis after she retrieved all the dismembered body parts of her murdered husband Osiris, except his penis which was thrown into the Nile and eaten by a catfish,[6][7]有冇證據呀?係咪又pseudo-scientific pseudo-historical呀?
Although considered fringe pseudo-scientific不是我的論點,是維基的論點,你以為維基的論點在支持你?你找個懂英文的讀讀全段,讓他解釋給你聽聽,維基到底覺得Jesus Horus平行論是否成立。連英文連接詞Although, Nonetheless的意思都不懂,少來強辯。
由是解得,維基沒有不支持我,反只是不支持你,而我也不避忌談論反面的資料,反倒是閣下完全無意回答
^ New York Folklore Society (1973). "New York folklore quarterly". 29. Cornell University Press. p. 294.
^ Ian Shaw (2003). The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-815034-2.
所說是誰復活Osirus。
你喜歡質疑不支持你的維基論述到底,也隨便你,只見對反面資料抱持的態度。Gasque是phd,權不權威我不清楚,hnn是不是權威我不清楚,hnn和Gasque引自己的權威說話,你喜歡不聽就不聽吧,反正就算人家列出20個人名,你又會逐個逐個質疑權威性吧。基本上你所引的資料離不開Murdock和Massey,搜搜維基也可知他們並非主流埃及學家,正正又見你選擇性維基閱讀。Murdock和Massey是不是權威,我讀讀維基就知道了。