返回列表 回覆 發帖

[新奇發現] 人死如燈滅? 科學家:死亡是幻象

人死是否如燈滅?美國維克森林大學科學家蘭扎(Robert Lanza)聲稱,利用量子物理學可證明,死後有另一個世界,而死亡只是人類創造出來的幻象。

蘭扎提出「生物中心主義」(Biocentrism)支持自己的論點,指生命創造宇宙,而不是宇宙創造生命,人的意識決定宇宙萬物的形狀及大小。蘭扎又以空間及時間為例,指它們只是人類「思想的工具」,一旦人類接受它們是由意識所創造的說法,那麼死亡亦不存在。不過,人類長久以來認為身體機能盡失,代表生命走到盡頭,故認為人死如燈滅,但蘭扎認為人死後會在另一個世界重新開始。

蘭扎引用著名的「雙縫實驗」(Double-slit experiment),指該實驗科學家在封閉的空間,觀察粒子穿過兩道狹縫的情況,結果發現粒子像子彈般,迅速穿越其中一道狹縫,但無觀察粒子移動方向的人,便以為粒子像電波般,同一時間穿過兩道狹縫,說明人類的看法與意識,影響對粒子移動的觀感,從而證明死亡只是人類幻想出來。

英國《每日郵報》

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20131116/18510832
一舊雲

點解科學家在封閉的空間,觀察粒子穿過兩道狹縫的情況,結果發現粒子像子彈般,迅速穿越其中一道狹縫,但無觀察粒子移動方向的人,便以為粒子像電波般,同一時間穿過兩道狹縫,說明人類的看法與意識,影響對粒子移動的觀感

就可以「從而證明死亡只是人類幻想出來」?
de omnibus dubitandum
條友講野九唔搭百, 係咪食左藥野呀?
用較詳細的英文會唔會容易D了解?

Does Death Exist? New Theory Says ‘No’

Many of us fear death. We believe in death because we have been told we will die. We associate ourselves with the body, and we know that bodies die. But a new scientific theory suggests that death is not the terminal event we think.

One well-known aspect of quantum physics is that certain observations cannot be predicted absolutely. Instead, there is a range of possible observations each with a different probability. One mainstream explanation, the “many-worlds” interpretation, states that each of these possible observations corresponds to a different universe (the ‘multiverse’). A new scientific theory – called biocentrism – refines these ideas. There are an infinite number of universes, and everything that could possibly happen occurs in some universe. Death does not exist in any real sense in these scenarios. All possible universes exist simultaneously, regardless of what happens in any of them. Although individual bodies are destined to self-destruct, the alive feeling – the ‘Who am I?’- is just a 20-watt fountain of energy operating in the brain. But this energy doesn’t go away at death. One of the surest axioms of science is that energy never dies; it can neither be created nor destroyed. But does this energy transcend from one world to the other?

Consider an experiment that was recently published in the journal Science showing that scientists could retroactively change something that had happened in the past. Particles had to decide how to behave when they hit a beam splitter. Later on, the experimenter could turn a second switch on or off. It turns out that what the observer decided at that point, determined what the particle did in the past. Regardless of the choice you, the observer, make, it is you who will experience the outcomes that will result. The linkages between these various histories and universes transcend our ordinary classical ideas of space and time. Think of the 20-watts of energy as simply holo-projecting either this or that result onto a screen. Whether you turn the second beam splitter on or off, it’s still the same battery or agent responsible for the projection.

According to Biocentrism, space and time are not the hard objects we think. Wave your hand through the air – if you take everything away, what’s left? Nothing. The same thing applies for time. You can’t see anything through the bone that surrounds your brain. Everything you see and experience right now is a whirl of information occurring in your mind. Space and time are simply the tools for putting everything together.

Death does not exist in a timeless, spaceless world. In the end, even Einstein admitted, “Now Besso” (an old friend) “has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. That means nothing. People like us…know that the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.” Immortality doesn’t mean a perpetual existence in time without end, but rather resides outside of time altogether.

This was clear with the death of my sister Christine. After viewing her body at the hospital, I went out to speak with family members. Christine’s husband – Ed – started to sob uncontrollably. For a few moments I felt like I was transcending the provincialism of time. I thought about the 20-watts of energy, and about experiments that show a single particle can pass through two holes at the same time. I could not dismiss the conclusion: Christine was both alive and dead, outside of time.

Christine had had a hard life. She had finally found a man that she loved very much. My younger sister couldn’t make it to her wedding because she had a card game that had been scheduled for several weeks. My mother also couldn’t make the wedding due to an important engagement she had at the Elks Club. The wedding was one of the most important days in Christine’s life. Since no one else from our side of the family showed, Christine asked me to walk her down the aisle to give her away.

Soon after the wedding, Christine and Ed were driving to the dream house they had just bought when their car hit a patch of black ice. She was thrown from the car and landed in a banking of snow.

“Ed,” she said “I can’t feel my leg.”

She never knew that her liver had been ripped in half and blood was rushing into her peritoneum.

After the death of his son, Emerson wrote “Our life is not so much threatened as our perception. I grieve that grief can teach me nothing, nor carry me one step into real nature.”

Whether it’s flipping the switch for the Science experiment, or turning the driving wheel ever so slightly this way or that way on black-ice, it’s the 20-watts of energy that will experience the result. In some cases the car will swerve off the road, but in other cases the car will continue on its way to my sister’s dream house.

Christine had recently lost 100 pounds, and Ed had bought her a surprise pair of diamond earrings. It’s going to be hard to wait, but I know Christine is going to look fabulous in them the next time I see her.

http://www.robertlanza.com/does-death-exist-new-theory-says-no-2/

(原來佢係2009年已經講過一次:http://www.robertlanza.com/does-death-exist-new-theory-says-no/
支持鼓勵每位離教者
咁請問其實呢位仁兄係發生咗乜事呢?
de omnibus dubitandum
回覆 5# 沙文


根據個位科學家高見, 呢位仁兄應該用另一種方法生存緊.......
回覆 6# Thompson

恭喜佢。

罪案率可大為降低:謀殺、誤殺、過失殺人等控罪須要取消。

但死啦, 我份人壽保險會唔会冇得賠咖?
現在的科學可以100%肯定,
人係由大概1000億億億(10^27)粒原素組成,
人死後的1000億億億粒原素,會自由走動, 不會被消滅也不會死亡。
即使被火化後海葬再被魚食,這1000億億億粒原素,都不會消滅。

即係大家都聽過的,謂物質不滅定律,或質量守恒定理

咁算唔算係死

但我認為亦是死亡, 因為我們已變由生命變回物質。
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個