http://exchristian.hk/forum/view ... &extra=page%3D1
A previous post about the design argument...
Question: is that:
牛顿严正表示：“从诸天文系的奇妙的安排，我们不能不承认这必是一位全知全能神的作为。宇宙间一切有机无机万象万物，都是从永生真神的智慧大能而来；他是无所不在，无所不能的；他在这无量无边，井然有序的大千世界中，凭其旨意，创造万物，运行万物，并将生命、气息、万物赐给人类；我们的生活、动作、存留，都在乎他，宇宙万物必有一位全能的神在掌管统治。”“在望远镜的末端，我看到了神的踪迹。”
True?
回復 1# 的帖子
1. Well, even if there is no God, you still can't do whatever you want to do. Also, by some other moral principles, people can still be good, even without God. Basically, you can rely on your 良心 to behave well...
"何必自觉向善呢"
2. It seems that "自觉向善" is simply a mean for you to get some future benefit, but not because you want to be good...No wonder you say "要多坏就多坏", if there is no benefit for you to be good...
"别忘了现在活着 就该感恩"
I always 感恩 for my living. it is just the case that I won't 感恩 to the Christian God that doesn't exist. I thank my parents for their love, thank my friends for their care..., but I can't find a reason to thank this nasty, non-existent Christian God.
回復 5# 的帖子
Do you have lunch in McDonxxx's everyday?
Think of a statement: "I have lunch in McDonxxx's today"
Would this statement's truth value be always the same? Some sort of interesting philosophy of language question... |
2008/2/8 17:07
| 
)同D老師辯經....