沙文

224# 旁觀者
那也不一定啦。即使移鼠大聖在眼前現形，但您如何能肯定這一定不是太乙真人變成洋邪神的樣子跟您玩玩呢？

旁觀者

217# prussianz
        屁眼教主移鼠說自己代表真理，他說：
    「你們奉我的名，無論求甚麼，我必成就，叫父因兒子得榮耀。」《約翰》14：13
      請閣下奉移鼠之名求洋邪神在閣下眼前出現，立即便能確定有没有洋邪神了。

沙文

222# 實
就係因為佢地雞，我地就俾小小煞氣。因為雞就凸顯唔到該教的殘酷嘛。而且您原先用「桃」，就顯得幾好食
不如「基督逃」啦，用來紀念Luk 4:28 的 Run away基督

實

不如「姬禿屠」啦，煞氣大尐
沙文 發表於 2009/5/6 11:25

做咩比佢地咁大殺氣, 雞雞地咁得架喇, 嘿~~~~~~~~

沙文

雞篤桃
實 發表於 2009/5/5 19:05

不如「姬禿屠」啦，煞氣大尐

實

愚蠢的是閣下, haha... why i need to prove to you 神"的存在?!... As I mentioned I am not saying this because of religious.  Just because u r stupid.. haha...  

"閣下能證明"神"的存在嗎?"  - This is ano ...
jojojokwok 發表於 2009/5/4 21:55

又一個狂妄自大既雞篤桃, 亦再一次証明邪經教出黎既人既品質

回頭是岸呀

Nomad

>想問問 nuclear reaction 怎樣產生反物質？俾如 U(235) + n ---> Xe(140) + Sr(94) + 2n, 係咪同 fission fragments(Xe, Sr) 嘅 radioactive decay 有關？

不是,.而是,比方說你那個U235 Reaction,當中一部份釋文的能量會以光子表達,而高能量(>1.022MeV,這幾乎一定是gamma ray)的光子與水或者其他物質時有一定機率會發生pair production製造electron和positron.


我忘了我貼了哪裡的link
不過,你不如去下面網頁看看
http://www.nei.org/

撻Q猛男

weakest>
佢話人stupid 又冇points, 係抵X的。

Nomad>
想問問 nuclear reaction 怎樣產生反物質？俾如 U(235) + n ---> Xe(140) + Sr(94) + 2n, 係咪同 fission fragments(Xe, Sr) 嘅 radioactive decay 有關？早前你登過關於核廢料循環那個 link, 可不可以再登多次？本人有 physics 底，亦是一路以來的興趣。Thx。

prussianz

207# jojojokwok
    反物質可以用科學方法檢測，「神」卻不可以。相反，若用基督教的方法，卻可以證明洋邪神並不存在。
    莫用並幻想出來的東西去愚弄自己！ ...
旁觀者 發表於 2009/5/5 12:33

若用基督教的方法，卻可以證明洋邪神並不存在。

how ?? ThANKs

:跪拜:

旁觀者

207# jojojokwok
    反物質可以用科學方法檢測，「神」卻不可以。相反，若用基督教的方法，卻可以證明洋邪神並不存在。
    莫用並幻想出來的東西去愚弄自己！

weakest

207# jojojokwok

各位咪咁樣harsh 佢la....Forum 唔一定要捉grammar 捉到咁緊ar ma...不過咁, 佢講"gamma rays", "antimatter"是想話 "Not all the existing things are able to be seen", 但係又 "say that not because of protecting any religious", 咁即係話jojojo講的"existing things"一定唔關任何宗教事啦...咁即係jojojo講的"existing things"一定跟耶神無關啦. 大家可以放心啦....

Nomad

207# jojojokwok

Can you propose a way to show that god actually exist? Or therefore any application that requires the assumption of His existence? If for stupidity's sake?

Well, unfortunately, deliberately seeing Gamma Ray is relatively easy, all you need is a bunch of Argon Gas and a high voltage electric supply - ionization spark will do the job. Anti-matter is a little bit harder, though not much, you need a gamma ray source with energy higher than 1.022MeV, a bubble chamber (which is really an oversized tank of liquid), and a huge magnetic field - the gamma ray will produce 2 particles with opposite orbital characteristics due to their opposite electrostatic charge, one of them shows a -ve charge which is a electron, the other one is the positron - the antiparticle (or "anti-matter) of electron, in fact, recombining them and produce photons (in form of 1.052MeV Gamma Ray) is an issue in nuclear reactors!

Also, if you want people to stop questioning your religion, you might as well consider telling them to learn less, not more.

And seriously, as a person studying in an English (note the Capital Letter) speaking country, your proficiency with English really makes me wonder how you could ever got into a PhD program to begin with.

撻Q猛男

207# jojojokwok
No, we cannot see antimatter but we know it exists because when we combine it with matter it releases energy, we cannot see air but when we light a match it burns. Not everything can be seen but believing it so easily without any evidence makes you exceptional, I mean exceptionally stupid.

No, no one can prove god doesn't exist, and no one can prove god exists either. This debate has been going on for centuries and if you think you know better you better check your brain, if you still have one.

Login

210# HTBROKE1
不明白證據和証明之間關係

那談下去也就浪費時間

jojojokwok

「你沒有辦法客觀上證明到你那神的存在」  ...haha... poor u... what is the logic to lead to that?!... stupid!!.. It may be helpful for you to eat more Omega3... you may be able to think smarter...

"這句英文有個很低能的語法錯誤" ... I think you have math problem too... The above is more than one sentence...   

BTW, from my 幼稚園 to my PHD... I still haven't got chance to see any 英文老師 cry for me ... Your 英文老師 always 淚流滿面 for you?!... Tell me what your feeling is...  haha... May be I don't mind to give u a hug...

Oh... besides, 低能英文 is for you... otherwise, I am afraid you don't understand what the meaning of the english ...

HTBROKE1

209# jojojokwok

「愚蠢的是閣下, haha... why i need to prove to you 神"的存在?!... As I mentioned I am not saying this because of religious.  Just because u r stupid.. haha...  」


你以為自己是誰?
因為宗教而不回答。唔唔,那就是「你沒有辦法客觀上證明到你那神的存在」。
我不會笑你的。反正沒有邏輯就是基督教的特點,閣下繼續自爽吧。(笑




「"閣下能證明"神"的存在嗎?"  - This is another stupid question... Just go back to school... study more, learn more... think something deeper ... and ask something smarter... don't be a loser in this world... poor poor... haha」

那你要由幼稚園開始重新讀過了。

這句英文有個很低能的語法錯誤。你的英文老師淚流滿面。

don't be a loser in this world嘛,跟你自己說吧。

jojojokwok

愚蠢的是閣下, haha... why i need to prove to you 神"的存在?!... As I mentioned I am not saying this because of religious.  Just because u r stupid.. haha...  

"閣下能證明"神"的存在嗎?"  - This is another stupid question... Just go back to school... study more, learn more... think something deeper ... and ask something smarter... don't be a loser in this world... poor poor... haha

旁觀者

207# jojojokwok
愚蠢的是閣下, 閣下能證明"神"的存在嗎?除非閣下是李偉光弟兄.

jojojokwok

10# 旁觀者
"無知的是閣下. 本人很希望看看"神"是甚個模樣" you are so stupid.  Not all the existing things are able to be seen!!... Have you seen antimatter?!... Have you seen gamma rays?!... shut up and learn more... I say that not because of protecting any religious, just because you are so stupid... haha...

旁觀者

又刮到個基督教邪教教派:
中華基督教救助協會
http://www.ccra.org.tw/