返回列表 回覆 發帖

衣服的重要性超乎我們的想像

有人在互聯網上提出一個奇特的問題:「聖經說人在犯罪之前是赤身露體而不害羞的,犯罪之後就恥於自己的裸體而要用衣服遮蔽了。那麼,基督徒在領洗那刻,所有罪過都獲得了天主赦免,已是一個全然無罪的人了,他們是否會覺得衣服很礙事,有脫之後快的衝動呢?還有,因為新天新地(天堂)的居民都沒有罪,所以他們都是赤身露體的嗎?」考慮到上述問題可能令人對聖經產生誤解,所以我想在這裏說一下自己的有關看法:

以上問題論及罪與穿衣服的關係,論點的核心是「罪」。因此先讓我們弄清楚什麼是罪?在世界的法律概念裏,「罪」是指違反政府制定的法律,犯罪者會受到相應的法律制裁;而天主所指的「罪」,是指違反天主制定的法律,犯罪就是背離天主。在聖經中,記載了天主向人頒布的法律,例如天主十誡和耶穌基督的兩條新誡命。聖經經文明確指出幾違反天主法律、不依天主誡命而行的就是罪:「人啊!已通知了你,什麼是善,上主要求於你的是什麼:無非就是履行正義,愛好慈善,虛心與你的天主來往。」(米該亞6:8)「所以人若知道該行善,卻不去行,這就是他的罪了。」(雅各伯書4:17)「凡是犯罪的,也就是作違法的事,因為罪過就是違法。」(若望一書3:4)

知道了天主所指的「罪」是什麼之後,我們就用這個「罪」的標準,去討論罪與穿衣服的關係,看看受洗的基督徒和新天新地的居民是否不需要穿衣服:

1)人類始祖亞當、厄娃在伊甸園犯罪之後,「上主天主為亞當和他的妻子做了件皮衣,給他們穿上」(創世紀3:21),從那時開始,天主就要求人穿衣服,以遮蓋墮落後的羞恥。天主多次頒布法律禁止人赤身裸體,要求人要衣著端莊,例如:「用麻布做褲子,從腰部直到大腿,遮蓋他們的裸體」(出谷紀28:42),「你們中任何人不可親近任何血親,去揭露她的下體:我是上主」(肋未紀18:6),「女人不可穿男人的服裝,男人亦不可穿女人的衣服」(申命記22:5)。另外,「穿衣服」也象徵天主的救贖,例如《依撒意亞》61章10節:「我要萬分喜樂於上主,我的心靈要歡躍於我的天主,因為他給我穿上救恩的衣服,給我披上義德的外衣,使我有如頭戴花冠的新郎,有如佩帶珍珠的新娘。」在聖經中,我們看到自從人類犯罪之後,天主就明確規定人必須穿衣服。因此,包括已領洗的基督徒在內,任何人若赤身露體,就是違反天主的法律,就是犯罪。

2)根據天主的啓示,新天新地的居民都要穿上具特別意義的衣服,以顯示了基督的救恩和彰顯了天主的榮耀。聖經提到這些聖徒的衣服時說:「這些人是由大災難中來的,他們曾在羔羊(註:指耶穌基督)的血中洗淨了自己的衣裳,使衣裳雪白⋯⋯天主又賞賜她穿上了華麗而潔白的細麻衣:這細麻衣就是聖徒們的義行。」(默示錄7:14,19:8)新天新地居民身上穿著被基督寶血洗淨的白衣,標誌着得救者的聖潔,證明罪已獲得天主赦免;還有那件天主賞賜的華麗細麻衣,顯示出他們的「義」。這些聖徒是天主的子女,他們身上的衣服是這個榮耀身份的象徵。

從聖經的以上啟示中,我們了解到「穿衣服」是天主對人類的要求,衣服的意義對於人類的今生和來世,有著不同的屬靈意涵,其重要性超乎我們的想像。因此,凡基督徒都應該端莊地、適當地穿衣服。
聖經又夠冇話信主一定要死前啦,你咪又信到了十足?估你唔到。原來你做嘢根本都唔跟聖經,仲有面喺度指天督地等人以為你真係咁神心。
不過你有興趣都未必有聲出,先前你好有興趣的保證有效Arango神父自己發聲明認衰仔,都唔多見你思考?
不如你又思考下基督係咪戴住bra釘架,然後再決定?
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
本帖最後由 逃出魔幻紀 於 2026/9/28 08:58 編輯
回覆  逃出魔幻紀

根據你同你老婆去遊水咁講
沙文 發表於 2026/9/28 05:28



    我思考嘅根據就係天主嘅教導,等你搵到天主喺邊度講過「女基督徒唔可以3點盡露, 但係男基督徒今生和來世就可以露兩點」,先嚟同我傾呢個問題啦。其他吹水嘢你搵有興趣嘅人慢慢吹啦。
回覆 8# beebeechan
問你一樣嘢:邊個主持女賓浸禮?
BTW,同長加影, 上次你包佢絕對有效嗰條友, 自己認咗衰仔喇。我費L事搵返嗰個thread, 就咁貼埋呢度啦。唔知點解竟然夾住喺同一篇報道嗰度。可能天主特登叫我點醒你

沙按: 主教仲話, 可能連婚姻有效性都受影響添, 屌, 我都諗唔起結婚嗰陣時講過啲乜


Priest Botched Thousands of Baptisms — by Changing One Word
In February 2022, a priest in Arizona resigned after it was revealed that he incorrectly performed baptisms for decades, possibly undermining the rite for thousands of people. Marina Pitofsky wrote in USA TODAY: “The Catholic Diocese of Phoenix on its website confirmed Fr. Andres Arango used the words “we baptize you in the name of the father and of the son and of the Holy Spirit,” instead of the correct phrase “I baptize you in the name of the father and of the son and of the Holy Spirit” in English and Spanish.[Source: Marina Pitofsky, USA TODAY, February 15, 2022]

The diocese explained that the single incorrect word matters for worshippers because “it is not the community that baptizes a person and incorporates them into the Church of Christ; rather, it is Christ, and Christ alone, who presides at all sacraments.” “Therefore, it is Christ who baptizes,” the diocese said. “If you were baptized using the wrong words, that means your baptism is invalid, and you are not baptized.” And shrugging off the invalid baptisms isn’t an option for many worshippers, because it affects sacred practices for Catholics such as confirmation, communion and more. The Diocese of Phoenix said the confusion could also affect marriages.

Arango has resigned as pastor of St. Gregory Parish in Phoenix. “I deeply regret my error and how this has affected numerous people in your parish and elsewhere,” he said in a statement. “With the help of the Holy Spirit and in communion with the Diocese of Phoenix, I will dedicate my energy and full time ministry to help remedy this and heal those affected.”

“Arango has served as a pastor, parochial administrator, parochial vicar and other religious roles for more than 20 years in Brazil, California and Arizona. All of the baptisms he performed “until June 17, 2021, are presumed invalid,” the Diocese of Phoenix said. “The diocese confirmed to USA TODAY that "the number of baptisms Father Arango has performed in his priestly ministry" is in the thousands.

https://europe.factsanddetails.c ... -774.html#chapter-9
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
從前嘅浸禮, 根本係剝光豬浸嘅, 唔係好似而家你哋整色整水咁密實

Baptism of Christ
by Meister von Daphn ...
沙文 發表於 2026/9/28 05:48


嗰時係分男賓部, 女賓部喎
唔係依家既男女混洗
從前嘅浸禮, 根本係剝光豬浸嘅, 唔係好似而家你哋整色整水咁密實

Baptism of Christ


by Meister von Daphni



https://europe.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-774.html



Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
其實樓主嘅觀點絕非基督教的全部, 歡迎各位教友參考以下 resources:

Inside a South Texas Christian Nudist Community
Naked as Created: The Pastor Jim Story 呢位剝光豬牧師係阿占? 唔係咁搞嘢下話?!

New CofE bishop Karen Gorham supports Christian naturism
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
回覆 3# 逃出魔幻紀

根據你同你老婆去遊水咁講
怎麼沒有講過?虔誠教徒要打屁股!
[https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWeM7qls8Ad/?stkn=MTNweDZra2FoNGNzZw==
先前我問過你個爛口教友一個問題, 條契弟唔L睬我, 既然你對這個問題咁有研究, 唔知你幫唔幫到我?
點解女基 ...
沙文 發表於 2026/9/27 22:13



    研究就唔敢講,思考下咁啦。思思下我都想問你:聖經邊度講過天主話「女基督徒唔可以3點盡露, 但係男基督徒今生和來世就可以露兩點」?你根據乜嘢咁講呢?
先前我問過你個爛口教友一個問題, 條契弟唔L睬我, 既然你對這個問題咁有研究, 唔知你幫唔幫到我?
點解女基督徒唔可以3點盡露, 但係男基督徒今生和來世就可以露兩點呢?嗰兩點有乜嘢屬靈意涵呢?

Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個