本帖最後由 jimmychauck 於 2024/4/16 02:51 編輯
回覆 12# leefeng
所以你咪同旁觀者一樣咁低級。
國之大義面前,你只睇到一個錯別字,大義唔洗理啦?!
或者,因為其他論點無法反駁,只好講個錯字囉。
饑吖嘛,個字好難識咩,我一日幾十萬上落,仲抽咁多空出黎點化你你都未識感激,手快快打錯一兩個字你就放大做文章?

https://paulgraham.com/disagree.html
讀多小小書就唔會死嘅
Even as high as DH5 we still sometimes see deliberate dishonesty, as when someone picks out minor points of an argument and refutes those. Sometimes the spirit in which this is done makes it more of a sophisticated form of ad hominem than actual refutation. For example, correcting someone's grammar, or harping on minor mistakes in names or numbers. Unless the opposing argument actually depends on such things, the only purpose of correcting them is to discredit one's opponent.
所以反映左,其實你係無法反駁其他野囉。
between ,你得閒答吓#117 #156啦,我好悶呀。 |