回覆 9# kam
基督徒唔跟隨聖經教導講粗口又唔睇下自己喺#4講過乜
kam 發表於 2026/3/1 22:44 
嗱，呢啲就完美示範，乜野叫一句都駁唔到啦。我就素來稱之為轉換話題，莫大嘅打不過就逃。我次次都係quote Paul Graham㗎啫。
https://paulgraham.com/disagree.html
DH2. Responding to Tone.
The next level up we start to see responses to the writing, rather than the writer. The lowest form of these is to disagree with the author's tone. E.g.
I can't believe the author dismisses intelligent design in such a cavalier fashion.
Though better than attacking the author, this is still a weak form of disagreement. It matters much more whether the author is wrong or right than what his tone is. Especially since tone is so hard to judge. Someone who has a chip on their shoulder about some topic might be offended by a tone that to other readers seemed neutral.
So if the worst thing you can say about something is to criticize its tone, you're not saying much. Is the author flippant, but correct? Better that than grave and wrong. And if the author is incorrect somewhere, say where.
我完全唔會當BBC講過嘅野係一回事，或者基督徒，你有咩關於佢嘅問題問返佢唔洗問我，我只係對你嘅水平作出評論啫。我亦唔會對你#9提出嘅內容作出評論，因為基本上係冇內容，想評論都做唔到。 |
2026/3/2 01:55
|