返回列表 回覆 發帖

[數據資料] 耶穌印度學佛? 有人深信有人疑

而中國近代佛教界最負盛名也最傳奇的虛雲大師(即電視劇《百年虛雲》裏面的主角)當年同樣認為,基督教和佛教同源一脈。



打著說法印的耶穌


舉一些在耶穌的學說中與佛教教義乃至於新時代體係互相印證的例子:


伊薩(耶穌)說:“永恆的聖靈明白,宇宙中隻有一個唯一和無形體的上帝”
(古猶太教《舊約》中說上帝名叫“耶和華”。在“新時代體係”(註1)中,耶穌曾說到這點遺憾:祂當時沒有跟人們說到祂所說的神,是否舊約中的這個神。但其實,我們理解這是不得已的緘默。畢竟,能讓更多人接受耶穌的說教的話,這個萬物之源有沒有一個名字,其實並不重要。而他所說的“無形體”,因為和《舊約》中的“有形體”不吻合,也被後期教會刪去。)

而此耶穌在早期教導中所講的“上帝”,實即佛家所稱無形無相,但能生十法界萬物的“一真法界”所在,“真如自性”所是。

此也即是新時代體係中所說的宇宙萬物之本源。





伊薩(耶穌)說:“祂(此沒有形體的上帝、神)是宇宙的唯一創造者與維持者。”

此正如佛家所言:“不知身心外洎山河虛空大地皆妙明真心中物”,由心念幻化出紛紜萬象的心,其實隻是“一心”。而此心是全然超越時空幻相之外的。

又如《道德經》所言:“由絕對的道生出統一,從統一衍生出宇宙的二元性,而基於此種二元性,三位一體又進一步產生了。三位一體是所有存在的最初起源。(即:‘道生一,一生二,二生三,三生萬物。’)”

而這也正是新時代體係中的基本理念。





伊薩(耶穌)說:“祂(此沒有形體的上帝、神)的存在既無始,亦無終。”

這便是佛“涅槃”後回歸法身本體的無始無終、永恒快樂、全知全覺。

此亦即是老子所說的:“道”!





耶穌首次把三位一體帶給人們,這是舊猶太教裏面所沒有的!
“三位一體”即:“聖父”、“聖子”、“聖靈”三位一體。

“聖父”,如前所述,即那個無形無體的本源。
此即佛家所講的佛“法身”。佛家雲:“一切諸佛,共用一法身。”也即是一切眾生與萬物的本源。

“聖子”,即每個人自己,包括耶穌自己。
佛家也說我們每個人都有自己的“法身慧命”。

“聖靈”,即那份愛、連結、智慧的特質。
即佛家所講的“真如自性”、道家的“道”那種流動、活潑、生機勃勃而且能造化萬物的特性。
在新時代體係中,則其本質被描述為無量的“光”與“愛”

“三位一體”,在耶穌傳教之前,以色列人並沒有“三位一體”這個概念。
我們(聖子)實在是那個一切萬有之源頭(聖父)的一個部分,所以說聖子、聖父其實一體。而聖父、聖子之本質,亦即是聖靈。





這其實同樣是佛家的概念。佛說:“心、佛、眾生三無差別”。
佛與眾生之不同乃在於心之呈現--所謂“萬法唯心”。而“心是法身,謂能生萬法,故號法界之身”。
心、佛、眾生皆緣於法身,又即是法身(自性)。

換句話說,佛即聖父,眾生即聖子,那份純真的、充滿光與愛的心念即指聖靈。

正如新時代所言:此“基督能量(天使能量)像種子一樣,存在於所有人類的內在”。
佛也說“人人皆有佛性,人人皆可成佛”,而且每個眾生(在經曆漫長的體驗、成長、進化後)都必將成佛,最後進入涅槃,共用一法身,進入永恒、全知、極樂的境界。





這其實更是當今盛行的“新時代體係”的核心概念。

即,有一個無始無終的生命源頭。不管你管這個源頭叫做“神”、“佛”、“上帝”、“阿拉”。。。這個生命源頭無形無相、全知全能。然而,在這個“一”的狀態中,祂無法去體驗自己的存在。於是,祂以心念投射創造出整個宇宙,並且把自己的一部份分成很多較小的片段體出去,讓祂們自由自在地去體驗祂所創造的這個時空宇宙,並在這個探險之旅中獲得學習、發展。因為這一切其實都是造物主的分身;所以,祂同時可以體驗到祂的分身們所體驗的。從這些分出去的片段體中,祂同時獲得了無窮的體驗樂趣。



這是一位有幾十年修行經驗的修行人元吾氏,從定中出神至高次元所親身實踐、驗證而畫的示意圖


而這些分身出去的靈體,亦具有巨大的神通力量,祂們中有很多又從自身中再分身很多出去體驗,以便在體驗中學習、提升。而再分身出去的較小部分靈體,還可以再分身。。。



元吾氏以其親身的出神經驗所畫的圖,和“新時代體係”中所描述的宇宙萬物之本質是吻合的(僅僅是所命名之名相不同而已)。


這些首幾次分身出去的靈體,便是不同次元的高次元靈體,無論你基於自己的文化或宗教稱祂們作神靈、天帝、天使或仙佛菩薩,或是在一些新時代資料中所稱為的“超靈”;乃至“超靈”中又包含的眾多分靈“大我”或稱“高我”。而高我再分身到第三密度物質空間,例如地球上肉身中的我們自己--每一位皆為某一個“高我”中的其中一個“面向”或稱為“分靈”、“子靈”。





從本源乃至到每一個高靈,都可以完全感知到自己的每一個低次元分身的狀態與感受,因為那其實是自己的一部分。而通常,第四密度以上的靈體,也都可以與高我聯係,感知到自己是更大的那個“我”的其中一個部分(亦有些並非很高次元的負面靈體例外)。隻有我們三維空間中的人類,才感知不到自己的那個更大的“大我”。所以,身為人類,也是感覺到最限製、最孤獨、最痛苦的。(少數動物,例如海豚等,也可以感知到那個更大的集體合一部分。)也因此,佛家及很多宗教或非宗教的修行人士,通過瑜伽、打坐、冥想等方法,讓自己逐漸恢複與高我的連結,並藉此而獲得(正確地講是“恢複”)智慧、靈感甚至各種神通力。





而每個人經過一世又一世的輪回體驗與曆練,在追求上,會逐漸地,從向外在的物理層面無休止地追求自我證明與欲望的滿足,慢慢地轉為向內在尋獲(自身本已存在的)圓滿。而在社會關係上,也逐漸地學會愛(慈悲、同理心),學會超越二元性(例如不再敵對、仇恨、鄙視。。乃至超越一切是非對錯,即佛家所講的放下“分別心”),從而獲得提升(到更高的次元)。。最終重回合一。





通過上述,我們現在可以更真切地理解“聖父、聖子、聖靈三位一體”或“心、佛、眾生三無差別”這些概念了不是嗎?同時我們也更能理解因何佛說每個眾生都“必將成佛”了不是嗎?

(在耶穌的原始教法中,其實我們每一個人都是“聖子”,都是“三位一體”的。每個人都可以通過努力,最後如他一樣感應得到。但後來統治者認為這個概念太前衛也太危險,將之刪改成,隻有耶穌才是聖子,才是“三位一體”,“唯有籍著我才得救”。這是當今主流基督教的最大缺憾。)



1879年北京出現的一幅想像畫--耶穌來到中國


伊薩(耶穌)亦講“因果”。
而這是佛教中的至理。你的思想、觀念、行為,在在都影響著你將來或來生的命運。
而在新時代體係中,因果法則,確實是幾個最主要的宇宙法則之一。因果業力的本質,不僅是關係到能量的平衡,更是一種“學習”--通過體驗自己所忽略或無視的對方感受,以及通過體驗自己(的信念、心念與行為)所造成的後果,而獲得學習與真正的領悟。另一些時候,則是再次去嚐試完成一個上次沒有處理好的人生課題。


無論《新約》中的耶穌與古卷中的伊薩,都教人“莫著相,莫拜偶像”。
而佛也同樣教導我們:“以色見我,以音聲求我,是人行邪道,不能見如來。”
(史學家更發現,最早期的佛教雕塑中,無論是法會、出行。。但凡佛坐的位置,都隻是一個空位而已。這是佛的誡命:弟子不可為祂畫像,也不可把祂的形象雕塑出來。)


基督教說,“要信靠唯一的造物主真神”。
佛教同樣地,千方百計地指引人們尋回自性--那個“本來面目”,而非去拜山神河神土地灶王爺。那些並不能有益於你的靈性成長。
新時代體係也同樣在循循教導我們:向內在尋求--尋找內在的神性--神就在你心內。





修行,是要向內的,而非向外——簡單地依賴於外來的力量。
可惜,後世的佛教信眾很多僅是盲目地熱衷於燒香拜拜祈福,而未了解真正的智慧。
而基督教徒則在後世佛教真正傳入後,就誤以為那些拜偶像的佛教也是膚淺無知的而摒除了。


耶穌說:“天國就在心裏”。
佛陀教訓說“諸法由心造”、“境由心轉”、“相由心生”,又所謂一念天堂,一念地獄--天堂與地獄都是唯心所造。
而一個開悟的人,就算身在牢獄,也恍如置身於極樂世界。





新時代體係進一步闡明:“你(的心念、信念)創造你的現實(You Creat Your Own Reality)”。你的信念包含在你的情緒之中。基於你的信念基礎上的心念以及情緒,當持續、累積到一定的強度,就會導致此所思、所想、所信的事情在現實中發生。例如,若你擔心/恐懼某些事情會發生,這個信念的能量在持續害怕的關注中會不斷地積累。。當這信念中包含的恐懼能量積累強化到一定的程度,就會最終顯化在你的生活中。反之正面的、美好的信念也是如此。我們前方生活中所遇到的一切,都是由先前所思所想而日積月累的信念(能量)所顯化的。





舉個例子,假如某甲認為這個世界就僅僅是一個弱肉強食的競爭世界;那麽在他的信念中,他周圍的朋友、同事(嚴重的話甚至親人),都成為了潛在的威脅,乃至競爭對手。如此,他人的一言一行,一個表情一個神態,都可能被他解讀成某種圖謀或者非善意的表達。可想而知,縱然他所在的國家並非在戰爭中,他卻已經是生活在一種缺乏安全感的,猶如戰爭狀態一般的恐懼中了。

反之假如他有個弟弟,這個弟弟的信念是“人性本善”,“知足常樂”,乃是個典型的樂天派;那麽他們兄弟兩人,即便生活在同一個家庭裏,其實卻是活在兩個完全不同的世界中了。再者,兩人在其信念之下各自的言行,又會進一步促成他們相異的命運乃至生命曆程。。





在心理與社會關係上是如此,即便在各種大大小小人生目標的追求上,也遵守於這條法則。請記得,我們每個人都是神的一個片段體,造物主用心念創造一切,我們同樣也能。隻不過,神或造物主在高次元可以創造得很快,而我們在厚重的物質界中,則顯化得比較慢,還需要附加地在屬於物質界的法則之下顯現,例如通過“采取行動”及“社會互動”,如此而已。

進一步說,你身體各部位的健康狀況,也同樣與這條法則密切相關——各類的心理設限、負面信念以及各種情感、情緒、心理暗影,會逐漸顯化成身體相關器官的健康問題(因而有所謂:下醫調身、中醫調炁、上醫調心——練習炁功、瑜伽等勝於藥物調理,而找到心理上的根源,才是根治);乃至於你的體型其實也和個性特質相關。





總括來說一句話就是:你自己,正是你生命中的一切,包括自我的創造者!
而這,同時也是佛家“三界唯心”、“萬法唯識”的另一個注解。


耶穌在《新約》經中教導:“要愛人如己”--包括愛仇人。

佛教的思想同樣認為“怨親平等”,乃至一切眾生都是平等的,要慈悲對待一切眾生。

事實上,在“新時代體係”中,高靈大師們的傳訊告訴我們:所有的靈體在投身為人(註:意指第三密度生命體,即也包括眾多史前文明,以及其他物質星球的“外星人”)的初期--也即是最稚嫩的階段,都是“服務自我者”,即人們所謂自私自利的“壞人”或“準壞人”咯。然而在經曆過漫長的生世輪回,嚐盡甜酸苦辣,曆盡一切害人與被害、愛人與被愛的經驗感受之後,就逐漸成熟進化成“服務他人者”,即我們所說的“大好人”了。這就好比如一個人在孩童階段通常會比較搗蛋,隻顧及自己的感受而很難去顧及他人;但隨著逐漸長大,他們的同理心、同情心、愛心也隨著閱曆慢慢成長起來了。

而若從更高的層面來講,這所有的好人、壞人、乃至一切眾生,其實都是最終極的那個源頭“我”的一個小部分、一個小片段體。換言之,那全部都是“我”啊!一切的體驗,也都是“我”要的體驗啊!

所以,通過“新時代體係”的解釋,我們是不是更能夠理解為何“眾生平等”,為何要“愛人如己”,包括愛敵人、愛仇人、愛一切眾生了?





所以,假如你自認為自己不是一個好人?或者,曾經做過一些不應該做的事?又或者有些該做的事卻沒有去做?請放心,對於一個高次元靈魂大師乃至我們的天父(那個造物主源頭之父)來說,哪怕你是壞人,祂們愛一個壞蛋,和愛自家一個淘氣的孩子是一樣的。祂們愛你和愛任何其他孩子並無分別。同時祂們也知曉你必將會成長起來。而假如你已經有所領悟,有所成長,那麽,祂們會是第一個在帷幕的另一邊,為你祝賀並感到欣慰的家人!

或若從一個更高更理性的層面來說,根本就無所謂好與壞、善與惡、光明與黑暗(以及其他一切的二元對立概念)--一切都是來自於“一”的顯化與體驗罷了。所以,開悟者不會評判(批判)。





註1:

“新時代”體係事實上並不具備一個嚴格的定義;恰相反,它卻正在致力於打破人們千百年來一些心內固有的框框和自我設限,並帶領人們去尋找一切問題的最終根源;最終覺醒於內在本有的愛、自由與神性。其實單要解釋“新時代”,就可以是長長一篇。這裏就先略過了,您有興趣的話,可以點擊以下鏈接,是我在網上看到對“新時代”的定義解釋得挺不錯的一篇:

“新時代”的定義
http://ggraphicc.com/b/image/JiDuFoJiao/DingYi.docx


這裏,筆者僅精簡地提一下,“新時代”思想體係當中最重要的組成部分,乃是近半個世紀以來一些極著名的來自高次元高靈的通靈訊息,以及一些在世的靈修大成就者所帶來的思想與啟發。

(筆者個人之所以走進“新時代”體係,是因為很多長久以來存在於心目中的,較為深層或者終極性的疑問;這些疑問筆者嚐試在各種哲學以及其它思想學術體係中,乃至各種宗教中都找不到答案;然卻在“新時代”體係中獲得了解答或者領悟。走進其中,就恍如走進了一個七彩炫目而且龐博無比的寶庫。)

這些靈性大師以及來自高維度的通靈訊息當中,具備了極高且深切的智慧與洞見,給予我們應付日常中所面對的問題以極大的啟發。

順便地,當中還涵蓋著很多被量子物理學界所逐步證實的科學理論(“新時代”體係中所涵蓋的領域甚為廣博)。而其中最為耳熟能詳的,當數愛恩斯坦的著名發現:物質和能量是可以互換的;物質、能量和意識根本上是相當的。或者說,所有的存在都是意識的一種形式,在某種意義上都是活的。例如,在量子物理學家波姆看來,心靈與物質,兩者之一都是對方的一個面向,它們相互滲透——“每一件事物質的東西,也是心靈的,而每一件是心靈的事物,也是物質的。”。

愛因斯坦還總結說:“個人是宇宙的一部分,則各部分被時間與空間所局限。他經驗著自己、自己的思想、自己的感覺,仿佛這是一樣與其它食物隔絕的東西。這是一種意識上的幻覺。這種幻覺是我們的監獄,將我們限製在私人的欲望中,隻關愛身邊少數幾個人。我們的任務,必是擴大自己的慈悲心,擁抱所有的生命與美麗的大自然,將自己從監獄中解放出來。”。這話聽起來,愛因斯坦不僅是一位科學家,還是一個佛教與“新時代”思想的信仰者了。(愛因斯坦對佛教同樣有著極高的評價)

同樣地,“新時代”體係對於大多數人所關心的身體疾病的療愈上,也給予了人們革命性的啟迪。例如台灣一位聰穎而善良的醫生許添盛,運用“新時代”體係中“賽斯書”裏面的理論來教導人們自己如何“轉變傳統觀念,找出並面對、化解心靈上的症結,病由心醫”。他著書並到處免費作公益演講,結果許許多多的聽眾和讀者根據他的方法,令自己的重症乃至絕症奇跡痊愈。新的成功案例源源不絕地被加進他的演講中。

又例如“深層溝通”技術創始人林顯宗老師,提取佛法中的唯識理論發展成為一套身心靈療愈技術,因其高效的療愈功能,獲得迅猛發展,每天都在創造著大量的奇跡。其技術縱然是來自於佛法,但原理同時也是和“新時代”體係中的身心靈理論吻合的。

基於上述種種,在近數十年以來,“新時代”運動在東、西方牽起了一股旋風熱潮。美國的民意調查表明:大約 25% 的人相信一種非傳統的、通常與“新時代”思想有關的上帝的觀念。從 1991~1995 年的一項長期調查結果表明:“新時代人”占總人口的20%,並且是第三大信仰團體。(筆者相信,“新時代人”的人數仍在呈指數增長中,尤其是近幾十年隨著越來越大量的“深藍兒童”、“水晶兒童”的出生。)

“新時代”體係中的眾多高次元高靈,包括佛陀、耶穌以及基於不同宗教與文化而被命名為“神”、“天使”、“菩薩”、“靈魂大師”的眾多高靈乃至終極源頭--宇宙之父等等。


祂們除了給予我們極為珍貴的啟迪外,有些並且修正了很多宗教在曆史演變中被扭曲的概念與問題。

此外,一些較普為人知的(非宗教性)住世靈性老師例如有:奧修、凱西、巴關、克裏斯那穆提、林顯宗、海靈格、上江洲、小祖母Kiesha、李納爾、彼尚、艾克哈特•托爾 等等。

而通靈訊息當中較為普為人知的“大部頭”例如有:“賽斯資料”係列、《一的法則》係列、《地球之書》、“歐林”的係列、佛陀傳達的《與神對話》係列(佛教徒請注意,切莫著了文字相)、耶穌傳達的《奇跡課程》及輔助教材係列、為耶穌的基督能量所注入的“約書亞”大師的訊息係列(“約書亞”是“耶穌”的原始譯音,為區別於被後世統治者所扭曲及刪剪的耶穌教義,《奇跡課程》及“約書亞”等在傳訊中都表示不用“耶穌”之名),等等。



劉德華、李連傑、王菲多名明星都推薦《與神對話》(三位可都是佛教徒呢)


此外在這段關鍵時期,還有更多來自於那些正在致力於幫助地球及人類順利揚升的高維度團體、集體及個人能量的,比較即時性的零散傳訊,例如銀河聯邦、光明聯盟、大天使邁克及其祂多位大天使、克裏昂磁性能量群、齊瑞爾大師、天狼星人SaLuSa、昴宿星人Alaje(肉身)、Higher能量群、Datre能量群、巴夏、希拉靈、聖哲曼、娜達女士、伊曼紐、地球母親蓋亞(沒錯,真的是萬物皆有靈,每個星球,乃至太陽,同樣都是有生命的——很高次元的生命——我們正居住在地球母親蓋亞的第三密度的身體上。假如你認為這難以想象,那麽你可以把自己想象成自己的小腸中,無數第二密度細菌中的其中一隻——根本不知道自己其實生活在一個龐大無比的第三密度生靈的身體裏。在“新時代”體係中,地球乃屬於高次元生命,是毋庸置疑的;但假如您是唯物論者,則可參考以下鏈接中科學家的分析:http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5b1b21af0102e31n.html),等等等等。



捷克街頭的“銀河聯邦”宣傳信息


之所以有這麽多的高靈在近數十年來頻繁湧現,一方面是因為人類的心智發展以及發達的傳播工具都適合於在這個時代以這種方式傳達。以靈媒傳訊的形式傳達的一個好處是,避免了重蹈覆轍曆史以來人們對大師的崇拜而造成的宗教化、儀式化與一係列所帶來的外在依賴(稚嫩時或許需要點依賴,長大後就該學會獨立於內在了),以及因權力與腐化而造成的教義扭曲。而缺點則是,這樣的通靈傳訊有時候會真假難辨。因此高靈們也時常會提醒我們:小心辨別負面靈體的虛假傳訊,請以“愛”、“合一”、“帶來正面心態”作為鑒別的基準。(例如獵戶座、天狼星都各有正面、負面兩股勢力。好在在此關鍵時候,負面勢力已經基本被趕走,僅留下不足以影響局面的一小部分。高靈說,這是為了留給我們,作為學習讓自己去分析分辨的練習之用)。

而另一方面,這也與太陽係即將於 2012 年年底完全進入銀河係光子帶有關。這源自於銀河係中心的一道寬廣的光子光流。昴宿星團的中央星昴宿六一直是停留在這光子帶中。當地球和太陽係以 26,000 年的時間、以橢圓形的軌道繞昴宿六一周,整個太陽係也會在每隔 11,000 年,就會有 2,000 年的時間會通過光子帶。換句話說,每個 26,000 年(精確的科學數據是:25,920年)循環的頭 2,000 年太陽會融入光子帶,然後在脫離光子帶的 11,000 年後,也就是繞行到軌道的另一邊時,太陽係又會再度進入光子帶。而 2012 年年底,太陽係將再一次全面進入光子帶。


以下是科學界關於光子帶的一些研究:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_61c22f4c0100fh8l.html



光子帶示意圖


當進入光子帶,進入行星大氣層的光會大幅度增加,震動頻率也會大幅度增加。當達至完全進入之時,整個地球將進化蛻變進入第四密度(並在短時間內迅速過渡到第五密度)。至於地球上的人類,則一般需要進行大量的情緒、心智、靈性和肉體上的清理與提升,才能承受來自銀河係中心密集的光與能。





心智條件符合第五密度(靈性較高/振頻較高,換個更好理解的解釋是:心態更正面、更富於“愛心”、“無條件的大愛”,這和你是否有何種宗教信仰無關。)的人類將帶著肉身與地球一同揚升進入此次元。處於光子帶內這段時期,靈性的進化會是一個飛躍,有時也被稱作「光的時代」、「黃金時代」、或者是「啟悟的時代」。那個時候的環境以及人類的知覺與能力,都遠勝於第三密度物質界——人們擁有晶體化的身體,年輕、健康、充滿活力;相對於第三密度來說非常長壽;擁有心靈感應能力以及將意識轉化為實體的能力;能隨時地和自己的高我連接,並能感受到一切眾生實為一體。那時候的世界體係將會以無條件的愛為中心,人與人之間互相尊重平等。物質非常富裕充足,易於獲取。人們也不會為了錢而去工作,而是為了自己的興趣愛好以及為了服務他人而去工作,活出最高的自我。屆時的地球人將和宇宙的其他居民們融合在一起。他們會在地球上創造一個全新的、輝煌的文明。




中國鐵嶺的光工們打出迎接新紀元的橫幅,向鄉親們宣告天使要來。


所以,在這個階段裏,許多高次元生靈與外星文明都在不違反(地球這個第三密度物質界學校的)遊戲規則下,盡著最大的努力去提升人類——以通靈的形式,通過教導與提醒人類(從固有的觀念與各種框框中跳脫出來,尋到內在的神性與愛);以期盡可能大比數地讓更多人類(從第三密度的物質界課程——體驗分離,並從分離中學會超越二元對立,走向合一的課程中)畢業進入地球新紀元(下一個更高階,但相對舒服得多的學校與課程。但並非所有的“畢業者”都進入新地球。有一些通常是特地投身到地球來服務的所謂光之工作者,可能會選擇回歸自己原來的高次元家鄉)。


(對關於“能量←→物質”、“多維宇宙”、“空間穿越”等等量子物理學知識不了解但感興趣的朋友,推薦以下這部3集的科教片——是的,量子物理學比您所聽說過的神話都更神話、更不可思議):

《優雅的宇宙》
http://v.pptv.com/show/vEEibvCSKibjiabGdk.html





古《舊約》聖經,曾預言救世主將會到來。結果耶穌來了,然而卻被《舊約》信徒們釘死在十字架上。這是因為這位救世主並沒有以他們所以為的形式到來,並且他們也聽不懂或難以接受祂所說的那些非傳統的進階教導。(可笑的是那些信奉《舊約》的猶太人們,至今仍在等待著二千年前那位預言中的救世主到來)。

在耶穌的《新約》聖經中,耶穌又預言有一天祂與天國將再臨。是的,二千年後,耶穌真的來了!天國也正在進入!隻不過一如上次一樣,大多數的聖經信徒們,仍認不得祂,隻因為救世主又沒有以他們所以為的形式到來;並且,他們仍舊聽不懂或難以接受祂所說的那些非傳統的,更進階的教導。

這就是為何耶穌說:“進天國的路是窄的”,“隻有少數人被揀選”。這正如每一所學校中,每一年能畢業的學生都隻是全體學生中的少數而已。地球大學校的這一屆也是如此。不過各位非基督教徒請放心,耶穌這話不是說隻有基督徒才能得救。不管你是何種信仰,或有無宗教信仰,隻要你的身心靈已經清理得足夠的幹淨,心中有著相當的大愛與包容,振頻足夠高,你就能進入了!


提升的過程與方法 (這個圖表歸納得很不錯,讚歎作者):



請點擊以下相關閱讀:

2012年末不是末日,而是揚升——專家、皇室、法師、催眠者及官方揭秘


最全面有力的考證:早期被帝王刪修前的基督教奉行“素食”

生命輪回--幾個靈魂科學探索視頻及研究

人一生中不能不看的電影——《秘密》高清在線觀看

靈性與科學--難能可貴的電影《我們到底懂多少!?》

萬法唯識~量子物理學~賽斯資料~秘密~0極限~我們懂什麽

世上最牛的治療方法——《〇極限》介紹及下載

《死亡•奇跡•預言》及《天堂教我的七堂課》帶給我們的高靈教誨

~ 內在的誠實 & 小我(我執)撒謊的8個步驟 ~

超越二元對立--如何達至理解~寬恕~無生忍(薦)

《新時代與靈修合集V1.1典藏版》



此外,一些關於地球新紀元的相關資料已經被集結成書,例如有台灣十分暢銷的《2012心靈重生》,以及大陸由著名的鳳凰出版集團及隸屬大陸官方的光明出版社出版的一些書籍,屬“科普類”讀物而非“科幻類”,有興趣者不妨購買閱讀:


[url]https://zh.wenxuecity.com/bbs/ghost/149501.html



人哋話,我頭腦好混亂。
Unknown years of Jesus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The unknown years of Jesus (also called his silent years, lost years, or missing years) generally refers to the period of Jesus's life between his childhood and the beginning of his ministry, a period not described in the New Testament.[1][2]

The "lost years of Jesus" concept is usually encountered in esoteric literature (where it at times also refers to his possible post-crucifixion activities) but is not commonly used in scholarly literature since it is assumed that Jesus was probably working as a carpenter in Galilee, at least some of the time with Joseph, from the age of 12 to 29.[2][3][4]

In the late medieval period, there appeared Arthurian legends that the young Jesus had been in Britain.[5][6] In the 19th and 20th centuries theories began to emerge that between the ages of 12 and 29 Jesus had visited India, or had studied with the Essenes in the Judea desert.[4][7] Modern mainstream Christian scholarship has generally rejected these theories and holds that nothing is known about this time period in the life of Jesus.[4][8][9][10]

The use of the "lost years" in the "swoon hypothesis", suggests that Jesus survived his crucifixion and continued his life, instead of what was stated in the New Testament that he ascended into Heaven with two angels.[11] This, and the related view that he avoided crucifixion altogether, has given rise to several speculations about what happened to him in the supposed remaining years of his life, but these are not accepted by mainstream scholars either.[11][12][13]
Contents

    1 The 18 unknown years
        1.1 New Testament gap
        1.2 Background of Galilee and Judea
        1.3 Other sources
    2 Claims of young Jesus in Britain
    3 Claims of young Jesus in India and/or Tibet
        3.1 Nicolas Notovich, 1887
        3.2 Levi H. Dowling, 1908
        3.3 Nicholas Roerich, 1925
        3.4 Rejection by modern mainstream New Testament scholarship
    4 Other claims
        4.1 Japan
    5 Artistic and literary renditions
    6 See also
    7 References
    8 Further reading

The 18 unknown years

Jesus Discourse with His Disciples, James Tissot, c. 1890
New Testament gap
James Tissot's depiction of a young Jesus at the Temple (Luke 2:46), c. 1890. Brooklyn Museum

Following the accounts of Jesus' young life, there is a gap of about 18 years in his story in the New Testament.[4][8][14] Other than the statement that after he was 12 years old (Luke 2:42) Jesus "advanced in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and men" (Luke 2:52), the New Testament has no other details regarding the gap.[4] Christian tradition suggests that Jesus simply lived in Galilee during that period.[15] Modern scholarship holds that there is little historical information to determine what happened during those years.[4]

The ages of 12 and 29, the approximate ages at either end of the unknown years, have some significance in Judaism of the Second Temple period: 13 is the age of the bar mitzvah, the age of secular maturity,[2] and 30 the age of readiness for the priesthood, although Jesus was not of the tribe of Levi.[16]

Christians have generally taken the statement in Mark 6:3 referring to Jesus as "Is not this the carpenter...?" (Greek: οὐχ οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ τέκτων, romanized: ouch outos estin ho tektōn) as an indication that before the age of 30 Jesus had been working as a carpenter.[17] The tone of the passage leading to the question "Is not this the carpenter?" suggests familiarity with Jesus in the area, reinforcing that he had been generally seen as a carpenter in the gospel account before the start of his ministry.[17] Matthew 13:55 poses the question as "Is not this the carpenter's son?" suggesting that the profession tektōn had been a family business and Jesus was engaged in it before starting his preaching and ministry in the gospel accounts.[18][19]

Background of Galilee and Judea
See also: Cultural and historical background of Jesus

The historical record of the large number of workmen employed in the rebuilding of Sepphoris has led Batey (1984) and others to suggest that when Jesus was in his teens and twenties carpenters would have found more employment at Sepphoris rather than at the small town of Nazareth.[20]

Aside from secular employment some attempts have been made to reconstruct the theological and rabbinical circumstances of the "unknown years", e.g., soon after the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls novelist Edmund Wilson (1955) suggested Jesus may have studied with the Essenes,[21] followed by the Unitarian Charles F. Potter (1958) and others.[22] Other writers have taken the view that the predominance of Pharisees in Judea during that period, and Jesus' own later recorded interaction with the Pharisees, makes a Pharisee background more likely, as in the recorded case of another Galilean, Josephus studied with all three groups: Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes.[23]

Other sources
See also: Infancy gospels and Pseudepigrapha

The New Testament apocrypha and early Christian pseudepigrapha preserve various pious legends filling the "gaps" in Christ's youth. Charlesworth (2008) explains this as due to the canonical Gospels having left "a narrative vacuum" that many have attempted to fill.[24]

Jesus's childhood is described in the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew, and the Syriac Infancy Gospel, among other sources.[25]
Claims of young Jesus in Britain

The story of Jesus visiting Britain as a boy is a late medieval development based on legends connected with Joseph of Arimathea.[5][failed verification] During the late 12th century, Joseph of Arimathea became connected with the Arthurian cycle, appearing in them as the first keeper of the Holy Grail.[5] This idea first appears in Robert de Boron's Joseph d'Arimathie, in which Joseph receives the Grail from an apparition of Jesus and sends it with his followers to Britain. This theme is elaborated upon in Boron's sequels and in subsequent Arthurian works penned by others.[5]

Some Arthurian legends hold that Jesus travelled to Britain as a boy, lived at Priddy in the Mendips, and built the first wattle cabin at Glastonbury.[26] William Blake's early 19th-century poem "And did those feet in ancient time" was inspired by the story of Jesus travelling to Britain. In some versions, Joseph was supposedly a tin merchant and took Jesus under his care when his mother Mary was widowed.[27][28] Gordon Strachan wrote Jesus the Master Builder: Druid Mysteries and the Dawn of Christianity (1998), which was the basis of the documentary titled And Did Those Feet (2009). Strachan believed Jesus may have travelled to Britain to study with the Druids.[29]

Claims of young Jesus in India and/or Tibet
Nicolas Notovich, 1887
Main article: Nicolas Notovitch
Nicolas Notovitch

In 1887, Russian war correspondent Nicolas Notovitch claimed that while at the Hemis Monastery in Ladakh, he had learned of a document called the "Life of Saint Issa, Best of the Sons of Men" – Isa being the Arabic name of Jesus in Islam.[30][31][32] Notovitch's story, with a translated text of the "Life of Saint Issa", was published in French in 1894 as La vie inconnue de Jesus Christ (Unknown Life of Jesus Christ).[7][32]

According to the scrolls, Jesus abandoned Jerusalem at the age of 13 and set out towards Sind, “intending to improve and perfect himself in the divine understanding and to studying the laws of the great Buddha”. He crossed Punjab and reached Puri Jagannath where he studied the Vedas under Brahmin priests. He spent six years in Puri and Rajgirh, near Nalanda, the ancient seat of Hindu learning. Then he went to the Himalayas, and spent time in Tibetan monasteries, studying Buddhism,[30] and through Persia, returned to Jerusalem at the age of 29.

Notovitch's writings were immediately controversial and Max Müller stated that either the monks at the monastery had deceived Notovitch (or played a joke on him), or he had fabricated the evidence.[30][33][34] Müller then wrote to the monastery at Hemis and the head lama replied that there had been no Western visitor at the monastery in the past fifteen years and there were no documents related to Notovitch's story.[35] J. Archibald Douglas then visited Hemis monastery and interviewed the head lama who stated that Notovitch had never been there.[35] Indologist Leopold von Schroeder called Notovitch's story a "big fat lie".[36] Wilhelm Schneemelcher states that Notovich's accounts were soon exposed as fabrications, and that to date no one has even had a glimpse at the manuscripts Notovitch claims to have had.[7]

Notovich responded to claims to defend himself.[37] But once his story had been re-examined by historians – some even questioning his existence – it is claimed that Notovitch confessed to having fabricated the evidence.[36] Bart D. Ehrman states that "Today there is not a single recognized scholar on the planet who has any doubts about the matter. The entire story was invented by Notovitch, who earned a good deal of money and a substantial amount of notoriety for his hoax".[38] However, others deny that Notovich ever accepted the accusations against him – that his account was a forgery, etc. Although he was not impressed with his story, Sir Francis Younghusband recalls meeting Nicolas Notovitch near Skardu, not long before Notovitch had visited Hemis monastery.[39]

In 1922, Swami Abhedananda, the president of the Vedanta Society of New York between 1897 and 1921 and the author of several books, went to the Himalayas on foot and reached Tibet, where he studied Buddhist philosophy and Tibetan Buddhism. He went to the Hemis Monastery, and allegedly found the manuscript translated by Notovitch, which was a Tibetan translation of the original scrolls written in Pali. The lama said that it was a copy and that the original was in a monastery at Marbour near Lhasa. After Abhedananda's death in 1939, one of his disciples inquired about the documents at the Hemis monastery, but was told that they had disappeared.[40][41]

Levi H. Dowling, 1908
Main article: The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ

In 1908, Levi H. Dowling published the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ which he claimed was channeled to him from the "Akashic Records" as the true story of the life of Jesus, including "the 'lost' eighteen years silent in the New Testament." The narrative follows the young Jesus across India, Tibet, Persia, Assyria, Greece and Egypt.[42] Dowling's work was later used by Holger Kersten who combined it with elements derived from other sources such as the Ahmadiyya beliefs.[12]

Nicholas Roerich, 1925
Main article: Nicholas Roerich

In 1925, Nicholas Roerich recorded his travels through Ladakh in India. This portion of his journal was published in 1933 as part of Altai Himalaya. He recounts legends of Issa shared with him by the Ladak people and lamas including that Issa (Jesus) traveled from Palestine (Israel didn't exist in 1925) to India with merchants and taught the people. An extended section of this text parallels sections of Notovitch's book and Roerich comments on the remarkable similarity of the accounts of the Ladak to these passages, despite the Ladak's having no knowledge of Notovitch's book. He also recounts that the stories of others on his travel refer to various manuscripts and legends regarding Jesus (Issa) and that he personally visited the "abbot" of Hemis.[43]

Rejection by modern mainstream New Testament scholarship

Modern mainstream Christian scholarship has generally rejected any travels by Jesus to India, Tibet or surrounding areas as without historical basis:

    Robert Van Voorst states that modern scholarship has "almost unanimously agreed" that claims of the travels of Jesus to Tibet, Kashmir or rest of India contain "nothing of value".[9]

    Marcus Borg states that the suggestions that an adult Jesus traveled to Egypt or India and came into contact with Buddhism are "without historical foundation".[10]
    John Dominic Crossan states that none of the theories presented about the travels of Jesus to fill the gap between his early life and the start of his ministry have been supported by modern scholarship.[8]
    Leslie Houlden states that although modern parallels between the teachings of Jesus and Buddha have been drawn, these comparisons emerged after missionary contacts in the 19th century and there is no historically reliable evidence of contacts between Buddhism and Jesus.[44]
    Paula Fredriksen states that no serious scholarly work places Jesus outside the backdrop of 1st century Palestinian Judaism.[45]

Other claims
Japan

Some people in Japan have believed that Jesus visited them during the lost years and possibly survived the crucifixion to remain in Japan for the rest of his life. The legend exists in a village named Shingō, Aomori.[46]

Artistic and literary renditions

The boy Jesus represented as the Good Shepherd; image above the North door of the Church of the Good Shepherd (Rosemont, Pennsylvania)

In 1996, the documentary Mysteries of the Bible presented an overview of the theories related to the travels of Jesus to India and interviewed a number of scholars on the subject.[47]

Edward T. Martin's book King of Travelers: Jesus' Lost Years in India (2008) was used as the basis for Paul Davids' film Jesus in India (2008) shown on the Sundance Channel. The book and film cover Martin's search for Notovitch's claimed "Life of Issa."[48]

The book Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal, by Christopher Moore, is a fictional comedy which tells the story of Jesus' adolescence and his travels to India and China from the point of view of Jesus' best friend Biff.[49]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknown_years_of_Jesus

破譯耶穌的三位一體論

耶穌所講的上帝實際就是光,也就是佛教的如來藏、法身無量光佛及法身毗盧遮那佛。

耶穌所講的聖靈就是光與愛的心靈本質,也就是耶穌的親生母親及大地之母,也就是藏傳佛教的觀世音菩薩及綠度母。聖靈充滿的意思就是內心充滿對所有人的慈愛,也就是佛教的慈悲。

耶穌不僅是人子耶穌基督自己,不僅是神的獨生子,也是譬喻所有眾生自己,譬喻有待拯救的所有人類。人人皆可為耶穌。

聖父與聖子的本質是聖靈,故說聖靈是聖父及聖子所共發。
The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ: The Philosophic and Practical Basis of the Religion of the Aquarian Age of the World and of the Church Universal
Author        Levi H. Dowling
Language        English
Published        1 December 1908

The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ (full title: The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ: The Philosophic and Practical Basis of the Religion of the Aquarian Age of the World and of the Church Universal) is a book by Levi H. Dowling. It was first published on 1 December 1908. Dowling said he had transcribed the text of the book from the akashic records, a purported compendium of mystical knowledge supposedly encoded in a non-physical plane of existence. In the later 20th century, it was adopted by New Age spiritual groups.

The title is derived from the practice in astrology of naming time periods in terms of constellations and their dominant positions in the sky, according to the earth's axial precession. In that system, the Age of Aquarius is approaching.[1]
Contents

    1 Composition
    2 Major points
    3 Difficulties
    4 Aquarian church
    5 See also
    6 References
        6.1 Text sources
    7 Further reading
    8 External links

Composition

    SECTION I (Aleph): Birth and Early Life of Mary, Mother of Jesus
    SECTION II (Beth): Birth and Infancy of John, the Harbinger, and of Jesus
    SECTION III (Gimel): Education of Mary and Elizabeth in Zoan
    SECTION IV (Daleth): Childhood and Early Education of John the Harbinger
    SECTION V (He): Childhood and Early Education of Jesus
    SECTION VI (Vau): Life and Works of Jesus in India
    SECTION VII (Zain): Life and Works of Jesus in Tibet and Western India
    SECTION VIII (Cheth): Life and Works of Jesus in Persia
    SECTION IX (Teth): Life and Works of Jesus in Assyria
    SECTION X (Jod): Life and Works of Jesus in Greece
    SECTION XI (Caph): Life and Works of Jesus in Egypt
    SECTION XII (Lamed): The Council of the Seven Sages of the World
    SECTION XIII (Mem): The Ministry of John, the Harbinger
    SECTION XIV (Nun): The Christine Ministry of Jesus—Introductory Epoch
    SECTION XV (Samech): The First Annual Epoch of the Christine Ministry of Jesus
    SECTION XVI (Ain): The Second Annual Epoch of the Christine Ministry of Jesus
    SECTION XVII (Pe): The Third Annual Epoch of the Christine Ministry of Jesus
    SECTION XVIII (Tzaddi): The Arrest and Betrayal of Jesus
    SECTION XIX (Koph): The Trial and Execution of Jesus
    SECTION XX (Resh): The Resurrection of Jesus
    SECTION XXI (Schin): Materialization of the Spiritual Body of Jesus
    SECTION XXII (Tau): Establishment of the Christine Church

Major points
       
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

The Aquarian Gospel makes the following claims, among others:

    The revelation of The Aquarian Gospel was prophesied 2,000 years ago by Elihu, who conducted a school of the prophets in Zoan, Egypt. He said thus:

        "This age will comprehend but little of the works of Purity and Love; but not a word is lost, for in the Book of God's Remembrance a registry is made of every thought and word and deed.
        And When The world is ready to receive, lo, God will send a messenger to open up the book and copy from its sacred pages all the messages of Purity and Love. - Aquarian Gospel 7:25-26

    There are 18 unknown years of Jesus' life missing in the Bible (ages 12–30). Like Nicolas Notovitch did before in his The Unknown Life Of Jesus Christ: By The Discoverer Of The Manuscript (1887), the Aquarian Gospel documents these 18 years as a time when Jesus travels to the centers of wisdom in western India, Tibet, Persia, Assyria, Greece, and Egypt. In each of these capital cities, he is educated, tested, and teaches the religious leaders. Jesus inevitably proves that he is 'God's chosen one' (the Christ) in these locales and brings back this multi-cultural wisdom and confidence to Galilee and Judea.
    Jesus puts on the role of The Christ, but is not automatically Christ by nature. By making himself, through desire, effort, ability and prayer, a fit vessel, Jesus enabled The Christ to dwell within him. Christ is therefore used as a term for the seemingly perfect human being that Jesus exemplified, a human being that has been "Christened" (anointed) and therefore made holy.
    Jesus came to Earth to show the way back to God via his lifestyle and teachings. He is the example we must model our own lives after, if we seek salvation.
    Reincarnation exists and karma ("You reap what you sow") is the explanation for various injustices. Reincarnation allows people to settle debts they have incurred in past lives.
    Humanity has forgotten God and is currently working its way back to fully remembering God.
    Time is separated into ages. These ages last approximately 2,000 years. We are now nearing the start of the Aquarian Age.
    All souls will eventually mature and evolve towards the perfect, like Jesus the Christ.
    No soul is ever abandoned by God.
    The trinity is strength, love and wisdom.

Difficulties

In his 1931 book, Strange New Gospels, the biblical scholar Edgar J. Goodspeed noted:

        "Augustus Caesar reigned and Herod Antipas was ruler in Jerusalem." This opening sentence of the new gospel does not encourage any very high hopes as to its historical value. It is generally accepted that Antipas never rules in Jerusalem but in Galilee. Of course Dowling means Herod the Great."[2]

    Also, that Dowling has borrowed a number of details from the aprocryphal Gospel of James, a work that may not be older than the fifth century, such as details about the childhood of Mary and her marriage to Joseph, the birth of Jesus in a cave, and the account of the death of Zacharias which differs from the account given by Origen and other early Fathers.
    Goodspeed notes that the many ancient religions and philosophies taught, in many different countries, to young Jesus in the book seem "colored by Christian Science."

Eric Pement has pointed out difficulties in Dowling's text:

    The book depicts Jesus as visiting the cities of Lahore, India (pre-Partition in India, now in Pakistan), Shri Jagannath in the temple at Puri in Odisha, India, and Persepolis in Persia. Only the temple at Puri existed at that period; Lahore did not exist during the period in question, and Persepolis had already been destroyed by Alexander the Great.[3] The book asserts Jesus had remained in the Jagannātha Temple of Puri for four years, preaching among the downtrodden and low caste people.
    Dowling and Edgar Cayce both claimed to have produced an account of the life of Jesus through the transcription of the akashic records, but there are significant differences between their accounts.[3]
    Dowling claimed that Jesus knew Meng-tse of Lhasa, Tibet but Meng-tse lived 300 years before Jesus' time.[3]

Supporters of Dowling argue that within theosophical thought, figures such as Meng-Tse, Matheno, Miriam, Moses, Elijah and Vidyapati exist in an ascended state. As such, they communicated with Jesus after they had passed on from earthly existence.[4]

Aquarian church
       
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

The Aquarian Christine Church Universal, Inc. (ACCU) is a denomination based on the Aquarian Gospel. Members are commonly called Aquarians, but the proper term would be Aquarian Christines. The name Christine is used in the Aquarian Gospel instead of Christian, emphasizing that the church is the Bride of Christ. The church was incorporated in 2006, but had existed for numerous[quantify] years previous to incorporation. There are no paid professional clergy.

The teachings of the Aquarian Church are based primarily on the Aquarian Gospel, but also on other writings by Levi Dowling, and share many teachings with the I Am Activity (I Am Movement) and Ascended Master Teachings. Some of the teachings include a Triune God composed of God the Father, Christ the Son and the Mother Holy Spirit, release from the cycle of rebirth through the Ascension Process, the equality of the races and sexes and the transformation (transmuting) of the individual and the world through the study and practice of the teachings.[4][third-party source needed]

The Moorish Science Temple of America, a religion predominantly adhered to by African-Americans, founded five years after the publication of the Aquarian Gospel, takes much of its "Holy Koran" from the Aquarian Gospel.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th ... of_Jesus_the_Christ
人哋話,我頭腦好混亂。
哈佛專家 發表於 2021/9/16 00:32
因为人地唔抵得你系才子。
聖靈充滿的意思就是內心充滿對所有人的慈愛
哈佛專家 發表於 2021/9/16 03:24

    唔好發神經咯。
    極毒教開口殺生靈、埋口屠親族,一個極之歹惡嘅邪教,會「充滿慈愛」?
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個