beebeechan

你唔係以為我會蠢到以為你稱呼人地做曱甴

jimmychauck 發表於 2024/6/28 05:40

叫黑暴為曱甴的確係有反映佢哋背後既貶意架
當時, 啲黑暴所為,   又真係乞人憎架喎

beebeechan

回覆  beebeechan

點樣生成都好，請問六十六卷書入面宜家邊卷書有足夠多人爭辯係咪正統？你喺呢堆正統到 ...
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/6/28 05:44

嘿....基督教既聖經, 淨係少咗七本書, 已經唔係咁正統

唔講嗰啲愈分枝, 愈走樣既教義

jimmychauck

回覆 80# beebeechan

咁你站在黃絲對立面上，又要為曱甴一詞不誠不實地辯護，無法攞有效文明嘅論述出黎。
我個人係咁直㗎啦，你唔想文明講口，真係唔好嘥時間。
我吊9班爛屍都係咁講㗎啦，一日到黑淨係識得匿埋喺老共槍杆後面，毫無論述，講拳咪算，扮咩講道理啫？
連"用曱甴去物化異議者係不文明不可接受嘅行為"都唔接受，咁底層嘅價值觀都唔同，有咩好傾？有咩需要傾？

jimmychauck

回覆 82# beebeechan

你又迴避問題做乜？問你六十六你就去講另外七卷，唔通天主教唔認同該六十六係正典？你答唔到咪認左佢。

jimmychauck

唔嘥時間答你，生成AI答你

what constitutes unacceptable discriminatory behaviour?
how does dehumanization play into this?

Dehumanization is a key factor that paves the way for unacceptable discriminatory behaviour. Here's how it works:

• Reduces Empathy: When we see someone as less than human, it's easier to dismiss their feelings and experiences. This makes us less likely to empathize with their situation or understand the impact of our actions.
• Justifies Unequal Treatment: If someone is seen as an animal, an object, or even a disease, it becomes easier to justify treating them unfairly. Dehumanization makes discrimination seem less wrong and more like a response to a threat or nuisance.
• Breaks Down Moral Barriers: When someone isn't considered fully human, the moral reservations about treating them poorly weaken. This can lead to more blatant and severe forms of discrimination.

Think about historical examples like genocides or slavery. Dehumanizing propaganda played a crucial role in making these atrocities seem acceptable.

Here's how dehumanization can manifest in everyday situations:

• Dehumanizing Language: Using slurs, comparing people to animals or objects, or making generalizations about entire groups are all ways to dehumanize.
• Denying Individuality: Treating everyone in a particular group as the same, ignoring their unique personalities and experiences, is a form of dehumanization.
• Fear-mongering: Dehumanization thrives on fear. When people are portrayed as a threat or danger, it's easier to justify discriminatory actions against them.

beebeechan

唔嘥時間答你，生成AI答你

what constitutes unacceptable discriminatory behaviour?
how does dehumaniz ...
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/6/28 06:03

時間係要嘥下
你認為人叫黑暴曱甴, 好使其他人都憎佢地, 真無陰公咁。
實情, 又係黑暴做咗啲乞人憎既所為, 先俾人叫曱甴之喎。


點解無人叫佢哋個黑貓, 黑俠, 黑玫瑰?



你有啲本末倒置

beebeechan

回覆  beebeechan

你又迴避問題做乜？問你六十六你就去講另外七卷，唔通天主教唔認同該六十六係正典？你 ...
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/6/28 05:58

你係7-11 買本雜誌, 明顯係俾人撕走咗七頁, 你仲會唔會買?

jimmychauck

回覆 86# beebeechan

本末倒置嘅係你，我冇怪罪過其他人非人化黃絲，我只要求你跟我討論時停止該行為，已點明乜野文明嘅標準，而你認為你自己嘅行為可以接受，無動於衷。

你覺得自己啱又好，點又好，乜都好，你嘅文明水準唔夠格同我傾呢啲事情。

共產黨為事件始作俑者嘅來龍去脈，我喺基督教宣揚殉道，支持黑暴一帖323開始已同guest124交待得非常清楚，你冇回應過我講過嘅內容，又唔夠格同我討論，我無需要再浪費我時間同你喺你迴避問題上面糾纏。

回覆 87# beebeechan
咁你咪清楚說明左我地係唔同宗教啦，冇事行開啲。
繼續迴避啦，同你喺[教會報憂] 菲天主教徒 5成教堂外成婚時嘅表現一樣

beebeechan

回覆  beebeechan

本末倒置嘅係你，我冇怪罪過其他人非人化黃絲，我只要求你跟我討論時停止該行為，已點 ...
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/6/28 06:59

黑暴期間,「曱甴」一詞, 泛指那些隨街堵路, 掟磚, 砸地鐵, 燒垃圾, 替人裝修, 私了的黑衣人。
同「黃絲」唔同, 上街示威遊行的不屬曱甴一族。
如「曱甴」這個稱號像踩到你條尾咁, 莫非你當日都係曱甴一隻?
是的話, 我無打算對你收回這稱號啵!


若你自命只是黃絲, 不是曱甴...咁我都唔係話你, 你又何需燥?

beebeechan

共產黨為事件始作俑者嘅來龍去脈，我喺基督教宣揚殉道，支持黑暴一帖323開始已同guest124交待得非常清楚，你冇回應過我講過嘅內容，又唔夠格同我討論，我無需要再浪費我時間同你喺你迴避問題上面糾纏。

回覆 87# beebeechan
咁你咪清楚說明左我地係唔同宗教啦，冇事行開啲。
繼續迴避啦，同你喺[教會報憂] 菲天主教徒 5成教堂外成婚時嘅表現一樣



jimmychauck 發表於 2024/6/28 06:59

話題要轉了嗎？

jimmychauck

回覆 89# beebeechan

犀利喎，將某啲人物化完可以當自己無事無辜偉大光明正確。
你問得我，即係你冇我資料我做過乜啦。
即係如果我滿足某啲條件你就可以物化我啦？
所以你冇資格要求我同你平等討論，唔好嘥我時間。

回覆 90# beebeechan
當日同你討論一個由共產黨為始作嘅問題，你就一路扯到我同樣留意到你物化人，而你拒絶收回物化言論。
可見你都係無法直接回應我討論嘅核心而要轉視線將人物化。

旁觀者

廢屎料之二:
若這個丁韙良發表了對中國咁不敬, 要鼓吹瓜分國的觀點,
為何1912年, 仍要委任他出任北京大學第一任校長?
至少, 在1949年前的國民黨攻府仍視丁韙良為德高望重的傳教士。
beebeechan 發表於 2024/6/27 06:42

世間不辨是非、認賊作父的人大把。
即如基督妖徒認惡魔耶和華為｢父｣、邪鬼耶穌為｢主｣、妖書為｢聖經｣一樣。

旁觀者

｢神父｣、｢牧師｣實為人中渣滓、社會垃圾！

beebeechan

回覆  beebeechan

犀利喎，將某啲人物化完可以當自己無事無辜偉大光明正確。
你問得我，即係你冇我資料我 ...
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/6/28 14:36

   

將某啲人物化完可以當自己無事無辜偉大光明正確

唔明你點解認為「將某啲人物化」就係「不偉大光明正確」。。

你讀那本唯一是正統的聖經中,就經常將人物化, 動物化。
以色列人為葡萄樹,
高傲的人為香柏樹
新約中, 耶穌叫:
法利塞人為無花果樹,
信徒為魚, 羊,
耶穌自己是那「除免世罪的天主羔羊」
經師,司祭們是豺狼
耶穌叫納罕婦人為狗
宗徒大事錄中稱教會中活躍的婦女為羚羊
保祿在書信中亦罵耶路撒冷固執的猶太人是狗


你不爽被曱甴化了時, 不如檢討一下當日做過了甚麼事。

jimmychauck

回覆 94# beebeechan

most of what you said in #94 is wrong.

https://exchristian.hk/forum/vie ... =0&page=6#pid176811

if you can't read, you can't read. No point I  try to teach you anything else.

beebeechan

回覆  beebeechan

most of what you said in #94 is wrong.



if you can't read, you can't read. No p ...
jimmychauck 2024/6/28 22:28 提交

你仲霸道過各安法。
話危害國家安全就是危害。
你話錯就是錯。

jimmychauck

回覆 96# beebeechan

Such an incompetent person.

You can't comprehend nor reason.

And yes, most of your #94 is wrong, you have 48 hours to figure them out, before I tell you the answer and conclusively prove there is no need for me to elaborate my answer to you in the future.

beebeechan

回覆  beebeechan

Such an incompetent person.

You can't comprehend nor reason.

And yes, most of y ...
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/6/29 01:34

好典型既黑暴曱甴作風....
一旦你呢類人掌權, 可能仲可怕過............

我只怕前門趕惡犬, 後門進豺狼。
(我寧願都係對住隻惡犬好過)

正如晚清時......義和團比傳教士, 教民更糟

jimmychauck

回覆 98# beebeechan

speaking as someone who can't comprehend nor reason

beebeechan

回覆  beebeechan

speaking as someone who can't comprehend nor reason
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/6/29 04:15

睇落你同屎忽旁都係無乜分別。
作風都係差唔多。