返回列表 回覆 發帖

超短基版:可考慮新增以下類別

其實你果招「Steve Wells無解經權威」,真係一個字都唔駛睇架。同理,如果我搵完,你都可以話「抽刀斷水無解經權威」而忽視,我又唔係師承乜乜神學院,搵黎做乜?
抽刀斷水 發表於 2024/10/23 22:32




所以你唔好在此亂拋垃圾
本帖最後由 beebeechan 於 2024/10/23 22:59 編輯
你都可以話「抽刀斷水無解經權威」而忽視,我又唔係師承乜乜神學院,搵黎做乜?
抽刀斷水 發表於 2024/10/23 22:32


係囉, 咁條steve wells 乜師承都無,
你又去搵佢出嚟嘅?
想買LV包, 唔係去女人街, 花園街搵架
其實你果招「Steve Wells無解經權威」,真係一個字都唔駛睇架。同理,如果我搵完,你都可以話「抽刀斷水無解經權威」而忽視,我又唔係師承乜乜神學院,搵黎做乜?
抽刀斷水 發表於 2024/10/23 22:32


弊在係即使是有權威的, 師承神學院的人講俾你聽, 你都係聽唔入耳囉。

係「內容」唔岩聽, 不是由誰人來講的問題
回覆 383# beebeechan


    係你對權威咁有要求咋喎,我就唔係。
回覆  beebeechan


    係你對權威咁有要求咋喎,我就唔係。
抽刀斷水 2024/10/24 00:02 提交

點解唔使睇權威?
當年鄧小平一句‘胡說八道’
耿飈收哂聲
本帖最後由 beebeechan 於 2024/10/24 00:54 編輯
回覆  beebeechan


    係你對權威咁有要求咋喎,我就唔係。
抽刀斷水 發表於 2024/10/24 00:02



    你既立場, 向來都是人如其名,水性高, be water..
今日唔權威時, 明日又來講權威架喇

B按:
例子:
依家你發覺無權威係SAB既死穴時, 就話吾使講權威
當日, 你就拎「教宗也向乜乜事道歉喇」...大曬權威
本帖最後由 beebeechan 於 2024/10/24 00:49 編輯
回覆  beebeechan


    係你對權威咁有要求咋喎,我就唔係。
抽刀斷水 發表於 2024/10/24 00:02


的確有時權威都不敵婦孺之見
當年權威都講咗野, 人都係患上盲搶鹽
依E家抽水盲搶SAB
回覆 378# 抽刀斷水

https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/christian.html

一早俾左你同李瘋啦,人地都列左5個網站啦,你又隨便淨係睇一個就咩559-492,你咁懶嘅?

話左559係亂槍打鳥,咁你揾唔揾到一個冇俾人反駁到?

早叫左你揾最有代表性最難反駁果啲啦,連咁都做唔到,五行陣破不了,八卦陣徒然碍手碍腳。我真係講到口臭。

又話唔主張,又咁上心,但又揾唔到好用嘅一組?

講一套,做一套,不令人佩服。

要令人覺得聖經有矛盾,就俾啲心機。懶懶散散求其東引西引,稍為求真嘅人都睇唔上眼呢啲唔堅嘅料。
回覆 379# 抽刀斷水

what is the role of editor in publishing?

The role of an editor in publishing is crucial and multifaceted. It involves overseeing the entire process of creating and producing a piece of writing, from the initial draft to the final published version. Here are some of the key responsibilities of an editor:

1. Development and Improvement:

Conceptualization: Editors often work with authors to develop or refine the initial concept or idea for a piece of writing.
Content Development: They provide guidance on structuring the content, ensuring a logical flow and coherence.
Fact-Checking: Editors verify the accuracy of information presented in the writing, ensuring that it is reliable and truthful.
Clarity and Conciseness: They help authors improve the clarity and conciseness of their writing, making it easier to understand and engage with.
2. Technical and Stylistic Editing:

Grammar and Punctuation: Editors correct grammatical errors, ensure proper punctuation usage, and maintain consistency in style.
Style and Tone: They help authors establish and maintain a consistent style and tone that is appropriate for the target audience and the subject matter.
Formatting and Layout: Editors ensure that the final product adheres to the publisher's guidelines for formatting, layout, and design.
3. Collaboration and Communication:

Author Relationships: Editors build and maintain positive relationships with authors, providing constructive feedback and support throughout the editing process.
Team Coordination: They coordinate with other team members, such as designers, proofreaders, and production staff, to ensure a smooth and efficient workflow.
Publisher Liaison: Editors act as a liaison between the author and the publisher, communicating project updates and addressing any concerns or issues.
4. Quality Control:

Proofreading: Editors carefully proofread the final manuscript to identify and correct any remaining errors.
Consistency and Accuracy: They ensure that the final product is consistent in style, tone, and formatting, and that it meets the highest standards of quality.
Overall, editors play a vital role in ensuring that published works are accurate, well-written, and engaging. They are responsible for maintaining high standards of quality and ensuring that the final product meets the needs and expectations of both the author and the reader.
   


可能你覺得自己係"收錄者"唔係"編輯"(我又唔知翻譯係咪有問題),叫做盡左收錄者嘅人事咁啦。
咁就不過,冇去到編輯應有嘅水平囉。
咁就自然冇一個正常編輯咁有說服力囉。

三人行就必有我師,人唔改變永遠固步自封就唔會有進步嘅。
本帖最後由 beebeechan 於 2024/10/24 04:20 編輯
你又隨便淨係睇一個就咩559-492,你咁懶嘅


唔止淨係睇一個。仲係一個中既第一條,559份之1。
懶到出汁啊
依家三人行有兩師。佢都唔珍惜
依家你發覺無權威係SAB既死穴時, 就話吾使講權威
當日, 你就拎「教宗也向乜乜事道歉喇」...大曬權威
beebeechan 發表於 2024/10/24 00:39



    係喎,教宗道咗歉喎,你唔提起我都唔記得添。不過,非教徒就唔覺得教宗有乜咁特別既,咪又係人一個,係教徒先咁緊張。
回覆  抽刀斷水



一早俾左你同李瘋啦,人地都列左5個網站啦,你又隨便淨係睇一個就咩559-492,你咁懶嘅 ...
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/10/24 02:55



    基督徒對自己信仰都咁懶,你唔想逐個對咪調轉由第559個矛盾搵囉:

Was Rahab saved by faith or works?
By faith.
By faith the harlot Rahab perished not with them that believed not, when she had received the spies with peace. Hebrews 11:31
By works.
Was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way? James 2:25

有反駁過咩?
回覆  抽刀斷水
可能你覺得自己係"收錄者"唔係"編輯"(我又唔知翻譯係咪有問題),叫做盡左收錄者嘅人事 ...
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/10/24 02:59


    新聞有時都會報道錯誤,學術研究報告也會有出錯,如果每個編輯都需要100%核實所有資料才可公佈,就咩都寫唔出黎了。

verify the accuracy of information <-- 用咩方法可以verify宗教相關既accuracy of information呢?宗教又用唔到科學方法黎verify喎,你又想帶我到好似陳版友咁講要信那些「權威」?

晌我既認知,聖經係有矛盾,亦列舉相關網站佐證,呢方面係有fact-checking,但當然無100%。你唔同意聖經有矛盾呢項,希望我撤回這條FAQ,就必須提出每一個相關網站內所有提及的聖經矛盾並予以合理推翻,你跟那些網站的維護人有共識後,我才可收回這條FAQ。

如果懶既,你都可以用「哪個矛盾影響上帝救恩?」,就跟陳版友說那些網站不是聖經權威專家所寫一樣,一條也不用看,那不就簡單了?

有心機既,就用:「聖經部分內容不能只按照字面理解,有些是比喻/隱喻/寓言/象徵……」,慢慢研究啦。
本帖最後由 jimmychauck 於 2024/10/24 16:55 編輯

回覆 393# 抽刀斷水

因為「信」是唯一的得救條件。雅各書中「信心沒有行為是死的」就解釋為:「如果一個人宣稱自己有信心,卻沒有行為去證明,那麼其實他的信心是假的、是死的(這也為雅各書前文後理的論調)。行為在人面前證明人有信心,但是行為不是得救條件,因為雅各也說,別人可以將自己『沒有信心的行為指給你看』,足以證明,可以有行為沒有信心,但是若宣稱自己有信心,就理應有行為。

我去超市買菜,一定要付錢,會有一將單據。有人拿著一張單據,不等如他一定付過錢,因為他可能是撿回來的,但是我如果不見了單據,同樣我也沒法合法地證明我曾付錢。如果得救條件是要你「曾在超市付款」的話,拿著單據算不得什麼,也無助得救。
jimmychauck 發表於 2009/3/4 17:15


我十五年前都答過啦。宜家一天飛機,人手上網,你用落後十五年嘅資料問我,咁落後?

從我俾你嘅網站,㩒㩒吓就到希伯來書11章就揾到啦

https://www.berenddeboer.net/sab/heb/11.html

Rahab was saved by faith as she believed that God's time had indeed come to punish the inhabitants of Israel for their sins, and she showed by her works that she had the true faith by protecting the spies. So we are saved by faith, and our works are a demonstration of it, and follow from it.

咪顯出你"編輯"嘅功力有幾高囉。功課都唔做,一味重覆撼頭埋我講過N次嘅情況做乜?



James 2:20  虛浮的人哪,你願意知道沒有行為的信心是死的嗎?
James 2:26 身體沒有靈魂是死的,信心沒有行為也是死的
James 2:25 喇合...不也是一樣因行為稱義嗎

明顯係解"用行為顯出信心是活的",簡單的斷章取義。

Jas 2:22  可見信心是與他的行為並行,而且信心因著行為才得成全。
Jas 2:23  這就應驗經上所說:「亞伯拉罕信神,這就算為他的義。」他又得稱為神的朋友。

2:22講得好清楚,信心才是主體

全段就係講緊有人口噏有信心,但行為不相稱。但叫人得救的仍是信心。



講左話559係一堆低質亂槍打鳥,我仲要講多幾多次?

你宜家到底主張定唔主張?你唔主張我唔洗同你討論㗎。
喺你心目中聖經不值你讀,充滿矛盾,你仲理得我一個sola scriptura嘅信徒認真唔認真啫?你證明到我唔認真,又幫助唔到你證明聖經有矛盾;你證明到聖經有矛盾,我幾認真都冇用,五行陣八卦陣嘅先後次序仲未識分?
果啲除聖經以外仲有權威嘅信徒你就可以問佢認唔認真啦。
回覆 396# jimmychauck


    Berend de Boer係乜水呀?係唔係權威解經專家黎架?

你研經咁叻,駛乜引述其他人對SAB既回應啫,你直頭出個website全面駁斥晒,等啲人唔駛一堆websites咁逐個睇邊個答咗邊部分啦,係咪?

第558組都未答,你又搵下?加油呀!
的確有時權威都不敵婦孺之見
當年權威都講咗野, 人都係患上盲搶鹽
依E家抽水盲搶SAB ...
beebeechan 發表於 2024/10/24 00:44


信任權威,就容易被愚弄,你又點諗到幾十年前既煙仔廣告,原來係靠權威醫生健康形象?

支持鼓勵每位離教者 › 閹割神父 刻不容緩 ‹
基督徒對自己信仰都咁懶
抽刀斷水 發表於 2024/10/24 11:01


BTW 謬誤列表-全知論證
回覆 397# 抽刀斷水

你不下功夫,其他人下了,你亦不主張,我無需答你。早說了,我無需重新發明車輪。
你這態度無助討論。
Berend de Boer係乜水呀?係唔係權威解經專家黎架?

抽刀斷水 發表於 2024/10/24 17:15


早講左,自己用腦,合理合邏輯咪聽,你係咪搞錯左我係BBC?你自己新舊教分唔清我好難由基礎開始教你。
Steve Wells係乜水,Berend de Boer就係乜水。


話題要轉了嗎?
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個