jimmychauck

回覆 687# leefeng

非不为也
实不能也
上流寄生族 發表於 2023/9/22 18:58

回覆  上流寄生族
咁你咪日日話玩厭唔答問題啦，非不為，實不能也。
jimmychauck 發表於 2023/9/22 22:16

jimmychauck

大陸一架運9通信指揮機於海峽中線以西航路向北飛行時，躲在和國泰航空由香港飛上海浦東的CX366客機下，位置短暫重疊及高度不同，企圖以民航機掩護軍機的方式混淆台方偵察，引起關注。
原文網址：解放軍今於大埕灣演訓　運9躲客機下避台偵察 | on.cc東網 | 兩岸 https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/cnnews/20230924/bkn-20230924111343388-0924_00952_001.html

咁㩒打，光明正大嘛，咪又係靠平民掩護。

jimmychauck

回覆 699# 上流寄生族

大把野都唔關你事你一樣出聲。

jimmychauck

條黃占歪理一籮籮，我的確唔曉答
leefeng 發表於 2023/10/2 03:14

唔曉答，點解人地講左咁耐都唔認，過左成個月先肯講？今個月功夫有進步，終於可以打敗上個月嘅自己了？

歪理都唔曉答，咁你係好有問題。你冇學識的話可以上網查"常見邏輯謬誤"，希望幫到你。

jimmychauck

回覆 702# leefeng

既然你講我嘅係歪理，你咪指出其中嘅謬誤。無法指出，即係冇，即係唔係歪理。

咁淺白都唔明，咪叫冇學識。耍嘴皮打嘴炮打飛機開口謾罵前言不對後語自打嘴巴否認事實呢幾家野不嬲爛屍最叻。

jimmychauck

回覆 705# leefeng

2. justification for attack actions?
there is no legal justification, simply none. Yet there is even less justification to what the police had done in 7.21, 8.31, 10.1 and all other police brutallity cases.
jimmychauck 發表於 2023/7/29 07:13

連港共政權邀請黎香港協助監警會調查嘅Clifford Stott教授都係咁講，你可以唔聽㗎。
jimmychauck 發表於 2023/8/6 12:17

所以你自認左唔曉答#156 #117，咪係因為#156 #117一早答晒你嘅問題囉，你一日到黑以為人地冇答，係你自己ON9唔睇，又唔識睇，關人忍事？

人地Clifford Stott都一早講得好清楚，所有暴力事件係721之後先大規模發生同升級。所以暴力係港共黑警做成。
我唔聽香港共產黨請返黎協助監警會嘅大學教授，唔通聽你個垃圾爛屍粉紅癈up？

有本事咪答#117 #156，一陣又講乜义樹倒猢猻散，一陣又時代鞭屍要攞暴力出黎講，你功夫日日長進打倒昨日自己，我企喺隔離袖手睇都得啦，橫掂你聽日又會黎打倒今日。

jimmychauck

回覆 707# 上流寄生族

非不为也
实不能也
上流寄生族 發表於 2023/9/22 18:58

口靚仔，教你斗轉星移，學野啦

jimmychauck

回覆 713# beebeechan

why talk to me? talk to Clifford Stott and whoever hired him. Like I am responsible for what he said.

jimmychauck

回覆 719# beebeechan

Why should I have to answer dehumanizing speech? You speak in English and you don't know how people speak English discuss?

jimmychauck

回覆 721# beebeechan

of course now that you brought it up, let me first grade #719 at the lowest level.
And it seems you have 0 idea of the seriousness of hate speech and dehumanization in the West, you simply do not hold same value as most people in the West.

jimmychauck

回覆 722# leefeng

原來你俾人窒到冇聲出。

jimmychauck

回覆 733# beebeechan

cockroach
beebeechan 發表於 2023/10/4 03:00

I see, on top of ignorant you are blind.

jimmychauck

回覆 736# beebeechan

And you just used it again.

do I need to give you a dictionary to look up "dehumanization"?

it shows that you don't hold values like "everyone is born equal", "everyone is born free".

you display a shocking lack of understanding of the basis of civilization, why bother discussing with you as an equal? would I discuss with a cockroach? I'd just squish it to death as girls scream at it.

Dehumanization is the basis of many humanitarian crime including human trafficking and slavery.

And I was right you have 0 idea what is behind the word "dehumanization" and its implication.

Even "林奠, 黑警死全家" treat them as human, you are below that.

Retract your dehumanizing speech or there does not need to be any discussion.

jimmychauck

回覆 738# beebeechan

https://www.google.com/search?q=hate+speech+definition

much to learn you still have, padawan. You have no idea what hate speech is, nor you have any domain knowledge there. You are soon gonna descend to mocking material like the other pinkies.

回覆 739# beebeechan

I see in 2019, the cockroach protestors regarded them to have more rights.
beebeechan 發表於 2023/10/5 01:49

13.b why give amnesty?
Oh by the way, the way we see it now? all the polices had been granted amnesty, hooray!

everyone is equal, some are more equal than others
jimmychauck 發表於 2023/7/29 07:13

have you had the ability to read, you would know you are speaking fool yourself.

jimmychauck

回覆 741# beebeechan

Everything that shows your double standard or your own wrong concept you will term it irrelevant, I am very used to this behaviour of yours.

retract your dehumanizing speech, or there need not to be an discussion, a mere cursing contest is good enough.

jimmychauck

回覆 743# leefeng



果然爛屍係低B啲，唔識用論壇？

jimmychauck

回覆 744# leefeng

非不为也
实不能也
上流寄生族 發表於 2023/9/22 18:58

jimmychauck

回覆 747# 上流寄生族

早知你無能為力

上/下
summary count
耍嘴皮x8

#47 耍嘴皮
#59 耍嘴皮
#74 無閱讀理解能力
#110 耍嘴皮
#420 耍嘴皮
#422 耍嘴皮
#424 耍嘴皮
#426 耍嘴皮
#427 耍嘴皮
#428 缺乏香港常識
#451 缺乏論證常識
jimmychauck 發表於 2023/8/8 08:06

閃埋一二邊咪做架兩。

jimmychauck

回覆 751# leefeng

答唔到咪認左佢，都等左你8/9個月啦，仲會有期望咩。

一日到黑只識潑婦罵街人身攻擊，最低果一兩級你係幾耍家㗎。

jimmychauck

回覆 749# 上流寄生族

你自己連聖經都唔熟，又唔係你出手，就咪咁大口氣。