返回列表 回覆 發帖

什麼是天主教及基督教的信仰?

回覆 190# beebeechan

第三四次講啦,死鬼聖人呀。你引幾多信徒代求嘅事例都冇用㗎,人死左就死左,呢個世界唔係火影忍者,冇通靈術㗎,死左就冇得幫你代求㗎啦。你有邊位聖人係死前封聖㗎?你連一次得救永遠得救都唔信啦,驚死邊日犯左致死嘅罪黎唔切告解香焦左添,到時唔好話封聖,上天堂都冇份呀。

做咩咁需要死人幫你代求?要借功德?你唔敢直接求?你唔信你未開口以先神已經知你需要?你唔信上帝不留下一樣好處不給衪愛的人?要揾啲死鬼出黎俾個下馬威耶穌睇逼佢聽你?
回覆 188# beebeechan
回覆 162# beebeechan

我冇話唔係代表天主,我話唔代表天主教,你自己讀白字又走黎屈我?
回覆 194# beebeechan
你都識講「官方翻譯」係叫「輔助中保」唔係「中保」。。即係兩個唔一樣。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 04:25

白馬非馬,牛乎?
喂你唔好又老作喎
教会宪章 62条
在聖寵的境界裏,瑪利亞為母親的這種職分:一直延續不斷,從天神來報時她以信德表示同意,她毫不猶疑地在十字架下堅持此一同意,直到所有被選者獲得榮冠的時候。事實上,她升天以後,猶未放棄她這項救世的職分。而以她頻頻的轉求,繼續為我們獲取永生的恩惠。以她的母愛照顧她聖子尚在人生旅途上為困難包圍的弟兄們,直到他們被引進幸福的天鄉。因此榮福童貞在教會內被稱為保護人、輔佐者、援助者、中保,不過這一點的意思,對基督惟一中保的尊嚴與能力,並無任何增損。

「官方翻譯」其實係「中保」,

回覆 195# beebeechan
點解聖經上無呢啲教導就唔會係神的教導。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 04:29

證有不證無,你話聖經有教信徒向死鬼聖人祈禱嘅,你咪舉出黎。
唔止冇,仲同唯一中保嘅教導衝突。
做咩咁需要死人幫你代求?要借功德?你唔敢直接求?你唔信你未開口以先神已經知你需要?你唔信上帝不留下一樣好處不給衪愛的人?要揾啲死鬼出黎俾個下馬威耶穌睇逼佢聽你?
jimmychauck 發表於 2025/7/30 23:25

你話你個上帝, 隨了用聖經外, 就再無方法給人啟示架咩?
你咁睇低上帝既能力喎。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 04:29
從來冇講過冇其他方法,係冇需要。聖經已可以叫屬神的人得以完全。點呀,呢句聖經又有誤你又反對吓話?你次次都混淆充要冇用㗎,只顯自己邏輯幾拙之嘛。

[quote]
聖經上都無叫人唔好一夜情, 打飛機, 啪太空油, 沉迷打機...墮胎.....咁呢通通都可以做矣??
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 04:29

不可姦淫,凡向婦女動淫念就是對她犯姦淫。聖靈所結的果子包括節制。經上記著的你都沒有讀懂就唔好大隻講咩"經文, 天主既意思....就識多你一截",醜字都唔識寫。

回覆 196# beebeechan
又要猜謎?
無頭無尾, 你想翕乜?

又要懶打字講清楚, 不如連帖都唔好出喇。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 04:29


你個正一唔做功課嘅癈柴。你做老師時學生冇做功課你係咪從來唔追㗎?

咁我都係問返一樣嘅問題,係咪冇左廿四個長老祈禱就聽唔到?係咪基督有咩insufficiency?你證明到未?啲乳香的煙與聖徒的祈禱係咪向廿四位長老發出?
係咪基督有咩insufficiency?你證明到未?
唔啱就答埋,點解唔係向廿四位長老祈禱,叫佢地做中保?聖母又咩新鮮蘿蔔皮?同廿四長老又有咩分別高低?
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/10/8 15:38
-有冇廿四個長老,神都聽到祈禱
-"聖母"作並列中保,我向其他弟兄祈禱是同等功效
-"聖母"作並列中保,我向廿四長老祈禱是同等功效
-你不知道"聖母"與廿四長老誰高誰低
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/10/9 22:34


早早就周你成日唔做功課全身插全劍黎上堂,好啦,宜家連自己有咩唔識答都唔記得想人地都唔記得?你同我節省少少啦。
不過好可能你個信口雌黃張口就來嘅人,根本從來都唔記得自己同人地有過乜野交談。你要是記得的話,斷估唔會咁多前言不對後語自打嘴巴。

回覆 188# beebeechan
回覆 162# beebeechan

我冇話唔係代表天主,我話唔代表天主教,你自己讀白字又走黎屈我?


你唔識自己追返自己162 同188講乜㗎?係咪自己講完嘅都當係癈話可以唔洗理?唔怪得你次次都唔明人地講乜啦。

回覆 197# beebeechan
人死咗就係死咗, 如燈滅呀?
咁耶穌在山上顯聖容時, 又call埋梅瑟, 厄里亞出嚟既....當時佢哋死咗好耐架喇。
你話耶穌呃鬼, 搵人扮嚟呃伯多祿?
即使係伯多祿見鬼...都說明人死不是燈滅喎。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 04:30

你又鳩噏乜野?我幾時講過人死如燈滅呀?
人死左靈魂歸陰間,雅各都知落陰間,右盜死果日都去左樂園同耶穌一齊啦。任何試圖接觸死人嘅行為都係交鬼,聖經明令禁止㗎啦。掃羅召上黎果隻你敢唔敢講係撤母耳靈魂定係邪靈假扮?
登山變像變完有冇話呀下次我唔得閒你揾摩西以利亞?你天主教又有冇揾過摩西以利亞?聖法蘭西斯聖貞德聖母聖姑婆你就揾,人地越大粒越近耶穌果啲你就唔揾。

分隔至聖所嘅幔子已裂成兩半,
又有基督耶穌已經死了,而且從死裡復活,現今在神的右邊,也替我們祈求,
又叫你只管坦然無懼的來到施恩的寶座前,為要得憐恤,蒙恩惠,作隨時的幫助。
你仲要同我攬住"聖人"們把托?耶穌功力唔夠,要揾多幾個人疊個少林羅漢陣喺隔離幫拖?大佬呀,聖父聖子同榮同質同永,聖子企聖父隔離開到聲祈求你都嫌唔夠?呢啲咪就係唔當佢係神、反對三位一體、當百物係神嘅褻瀆表現囉。

「關我叉事教」每個核心教義...都唔可以同經上配合。仲話唯獨聖經!
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 04:30

咁巴閉又邊個核心教義呀?邊叉個講過人死如燈滅呀?鳩噏得就鳩噏?


話題要轉了嗎?
本帖最後由 jimmychauck 於 2025/7/31 17:46 編輯

回覆 200# beebeechan
挑....
「輔助中保」又係你拎嚟既
知道衰咗勒....又唔認賬??
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 06:58

輔助中保係以前吳生講開,我一時順口啫。你堂堂天主教徒自己都唔熟自己書,竟然唔知「輔助中保」係唔準確,又用吳生嘅「輔助中保」白馬非馬黎擋箭,「中保」又要找指出黎,咁癈唔該你自己反省


挑....
同時, 你拎嚟既教憲章, 都講明「中保,不過這一點的意思,對基督惟一中保的尊嚴與能力,並無任何增損。」
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 06:58

有字就唔代表有道理,馬非馬,交由你說服人啦。頭腦正常嘅人睇到都知你教會憲章係鳩噏。

乜索太空油, 墮胎....沉迷打機....係犯姦淫架咩?
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 06:58

你斷章取義,自己斬左後半句,只顯自己居心同奇差嘅閱讀理解能力啫。

嗎啡都用得㗎,聖經邊度話唔俾用太空油,不如你解出黎吖。

回覆 202# beebeechan
依家成200帖架喇, 你叫人睇番回帶去162先知你想翕乜?

網上既野, 三秒都睇唔明, 睇唔完既就飛。...除非在 ...
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 06:59

以自己嘅無知及不求什解為傲,都幾切合藍絲嘅人設。
咁你承認自己上網講過乜野都唔洗負責,完全解釋到點解你信口雌黃張口就來毫無誠信吖。
我寫啲野呢就唔係一定要你明嘅,你唔洗咁睇得起自己。

回覆 203# beebeechan
咁耶穌自己在大博爾山上顯聖容時都係「交鬼」啵。

你敢唔敢講耶穌召上口嚟既梅瑟, 厄里亞係邪靈假扮? ...
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 07:00

耶穌神人二性,本身就係個靈啦。摩西以利亞香焦左之後佢兩個本身喺陰間樂園都同耶穌傾開㗎啦。
我當然可以斬釘截鐵話耶穌召上黎嘅係摩西以利亞嘅靈啦。你係咪相信耶穌會同邪靈合作演戲?勁呀,繼耶穌唔係神之後仲可以信耶穌會同邪靈合作。

咁你意思係咪以前唔得,宜家新約可以交鬼?答吓啦唔該,定係又睇唔明呀?

回覆 204# beebeechan
不過, 保祿又唔係咁講:

你又幾時證明左保羅寫希伯來書?係咪我入壇冇讀帖?

希伯來書4:16
我們既然有一位偉大的,進入了諸天的司祭,天主子耶穌,我們就應堅持所信奉的真道,
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 07:01

希伯來書4:16就好肯定唔係咁講

帳幔裂開, 是現在可以進入至聖所為人贖罪的, 不再是肋未人的大司祭, 是耶穌。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 07:01

哇你正一痴Q線,耶穌不嬲三位一體,根本本身就喺至聖所裡面,你又話佢係大祭司,仲係麥基洗德檔次,比大祭司更好,幾時要帳幔裂開先入得至聖所?

帳幔係分隔開至聖所同聖所,以前至聖所係大祭司一年只准入去一次,仲要縳條繩喺腰先入得,咪一陣間唔聖潔擊殺左都冇人敢入去收屍。聖所就係出面祭司供職。
所以幔子裂開,咩人以前被分隔宜家冇被分隔,係好清楚,只有信口雌黃張口就來之徒可以隨便搞混。

不是人人都可以入至聖所。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 07:01

Heb 10:19 弟兄們,我們既因耶穌的血得以坦然進入至聖所。
我唔該你唔好日日反對聖經同"保羅"。
我披戴住基督直接去施恩座前添啦。你慢慢喺聖所出面等,托人傳話入至聖所約櫃啦。

天主教的彌撒, 就是神父代表了耶穌的身份, 向天主獻祭。

人人皆司祭, 即係新教徒唔再需要耶穌矣? 炒耶穌魷魚?

信徒可以直接向天父祈禱, 但不可以直接向天父獻祭, 要通過耶穌(即神父)。
(不過, 之前說過, 新教的主日崇拜, 不是「獻祭」,, 只是聚會, 甚至降格為聯誼, 唱歌跳舞, 八八卦卦。)
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 07:01
Heb 10:1 律法既是將來美事的影兒,不是本物的真像,總不能藉著每年常獻一樣的祭物叫那近前來的人得以完全。
Heb 10:2 若不然,獻祭的事豈不早已止住了嗎?因為禮拜的人,良心既被潔淨,就不再覺得有罪了。
Heb 10:11 凡祭司天天站著事奉神,屢次獻上一樣的祭物,這祭物永不能除罪。
Heb 10:12 但基督獻了一次永遠的贖罪祭,就在神的右邊坐下了。

聖經講明,永遠的贖罪祭一次獻了,基督來都來了,死都死了,復活都復活了,返去都返去了,坐下都坐下了,你天主教仲日日要獻祭?
舊約去拜神,一定要去聖殿拜,拜神一定要獻祭,唔獻祭冇資格拜神,你又憑咩以為可以玩文字分開拜同祭?
我地不嬲可以憑著基督永遠的贖罪祭用心靈和誠實敬拜,我唔知你點解咁執著要獻祭再將基督殺在十字架上。

回覆 205# beebeechan
你話死人就係死咗, 同佢地祈禱係無意思。
你根本唔信永生。咁仲學乜人信基督教?! ...
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 07:02

人死如燈滅係一個核心教義?點解我唔知嘅?我以為係五個唯獨添。你又比基督徒有資格講咩係基督教核心教義,咩係基督教教義?
你反覆高速横跳鍾意點樣曲解人地嘅說話都得㗎啦。
乜原來人死左唔係死左?人死左係冇死?我不嬲都講死左靈魂落陰間㗎啦,你斷章取義我嘅說話係冇用㗎。不過雖然冇用,都似乎係你唯一可用嘅招式。
死左就冇得幫你代求。乜"有得幫你代求"係靈魂存在嘅唯一及必要證據?咦你對靈界認識都幾深喎,係咪交鬼交得多好有經驗?

為左講贏我竟然需要扭曲我嘅說話屈我唔信永生?都有可能你已黔驢技窮,"我們若靠基督,只在今生有指望,就算比眾人更可憐",我喺本網講左冇十次都有八次。

回覆 206# beebeechan
一般教徒是不可以踏足在上面。
只有神父, 修女, 輔祭, 執事或有任務的才可以上去。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 07:19

Heb 10:19 弟兄們,我們既因耶穌的血得以坦然進入至聖所。
Heb 4:16 所以,我們只管坦然無懼的來到施恩的寶座前,

乜耶穌的血唔救一般教徒㗎?冇洗淨佢地嘅罪㗎?佢地唔係個個星期都要飲"真實的essence上的耶穌的血"的嗎?唔係話天主教的"耶穌的血"更勝於基督教果啲像徵式嘅葡萄酒/汁㗎咩?

所以你天主教教嘅,根本同聖經唔同,所以咪要話聖經有誤囉。

仲要喺永遠嘅贖罪祭外繼續獻祭,祝你好運。

回覆 209# beebeechan
富人便開口請求亞巴郎可憐。
當時聖祖亞巴郎不是已死去二千年有多咩?

聖人, 聖祖還有能力在現世「做一些事」, 因為富人請亞巴郎:
那麼就請你打發拉匝祿到我父家去,因為我有五個兄弟,叫他警告他們,免得他們也來到這痛苦的地方。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 10:23


亞伯拉罕嘅靈同富人死左嘅靈同在陰間傾偈當然冇問題啦,兩個都死左去左陰間嘛。嗱你自己話㗎咋,隔左兩千年死都有偈傾度,摩西同以利亞當然可以同耶穌傾開啦。

而你又斷章取義喎,個故仔嘅結尾又唔講埋?係咪因為你估唔到?
Luk 16:29 亞伯拉罕說:『他們有摩西和先知的話可以聽從。』
Luk 16:30 他說:『我祖亞伯拉罕哪,不是的,若有一個從死裡復活的,到他們那裡去的,他們必要悔改。』
Luk 16:31 亞伯拉罕說:『若不聽從摩西和先知的話,就是有一個從死裡復活的,他們也是不聽勸。』」

無需通靈,亦唔會為你通靈,因為有摩西和先知的話可以聽從。

如死去的聖人聖祖没有代禱, 没有向天父替人講好說話求情的能力, 耶穌豈不是在作假見証?
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 10:23
呢個比喻度去代求果個又唔係聖人聖祖。
呢個比喻度去代求果個代求對象又唔係天父。
呢個比喻度去代求果個又唔係因為聽左在世嘅人嘅拜託走去代求。
咁所以"求已死聖人代求"根本係聖經冇嘅教導。
你可以隨便曲解故事去作假見証的嗎?
又有基督耶穌已經死了,而且從死裡復活,現今在神的右邊,也替我們祈求,
又叫你只管坦然無懼的來到施恩的寶座前,為要得憐恤,蒙恩惠,作隨時的幫助。
你仲要同我攬住"聖人"們把托?耶穌功力唔夠,要揾多幾個人疊個少林羅漢陣喺隔離幫拖?大佬呀,聖父聖子同榮同質同永,聖子企聖父隔離開到聲祈求你都嫌唔夠?呢啲咪就係唔當佢係神、反對三位一體、當百物係神嘅褻瀆表現囉。


話題要轉了嗎?
本帖最後由 jimmychauck 於 2025/7/31 22:02 編輯

回覆 211# beebeechan
依.....
一時又話聖經無誤架, 全部都係神默示。
就算唔係保祿寫..(況且呢個亦唔係一定對既講法)....咁就唔係默示, 唔使咁信嚟架嗱?
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:14


神默示信徒寫,呢樣野好難解釋俾你啲比較低智嘅人去明。
你唔洗用話術去轉移視線,我一直只係話你"講希伯來係保羅寫嘅"呢件事冇證據啫,你唔鍾意用證據去十卜自己講嘅野係你嘅事,我就從來冇講過希伯來書講嘅野有邊度有誤。

將自己教義斬件上枱一時一樣一併埋就時常自己駁番自己果個,就講咁耐都係你天主教,你若有聰明就只管辯駁。

回覆 212# beebeechan
所以話你以前聽聽埋埋既反天主教野, 唔係咁岩既。
你都未接收過天主教係點講就立下結論。
(呢啲就係俗稱既被洗腦。)
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:14

教會憲章62就我話你聽嘅
甚麼「輔助中保」真係你教會既「道說」, 你又「塗聽」
beebeechan 發表於 2024/10/8 00:49
你自己都唔熟自己書,好意思出黎同我講?唔該你睇清楚自己宗教點講先。
jimmychauck 發表於 2024/10/8 06:54
「輔助中保」呢隻白馬係你拎出嚟。唔好推落我到。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:14
你都識講「官方翻譯」係叫「輔助中保」唔係「中保」。。即係兩個唔一樣。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 04:25

就你自己都唔知頭唔知路嘅異端天主教教義,你自己都唔清唔楚,每次做澄清嘅都係我,根本你自己都未接收過天主教係點講,每一次我接收都比你快,你就絕對冇資格出聲話我被洗腦。
聖經講親乜野同天主教嘅教導反對嘅你都反對,你呢啲就叫俾天主教洗腦啦。

回覆 213# beebeechan
癈話,我有理從來唔係因為我寫字多。

回覆 214# beebeechan
聖經話順服賞善罸惡嘅掌權者吖嘛,咁如果英國政府話唔俾索,咪唔好索囉。港共政府就可以靠邊站吓啦。
咁按聖經俾唔俾食大麻呀?你又識唔識解呀?你係咪唔識答呀,我識呀。
當然聖經有講嘅先算數,冇講嘅就唔係真理,呢個牽涉你點論釋㗎嘛。你就唔洗詮釋嘅,天主教會講乜你就照信得㗎啦,洗左腦㗎嘛。

回覆 215# beebeechan
你咁講就係將耶穌神化。
咁「耶穌取得肉驅而成為人」咪多餘?
你係咪又打無誤既聖經臉?

耶穌咁神, 唔使出生八日就去割損, 去聖殿奉獻。
耶穌唔使受若翰施洗。
耶穌唔需要上耶路撒冷過逾越節


耶穌用神既身份, 咁替人贖罪就無意思喇。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:18

咁就明顯係你神學根基唔好啦,耶穌神人二性,係完全神同完全人嘛。完全神點會要幔子裂開先准乜乜乜?你自己否定左耶穌完全神嘅身份咪異端囉,你一直提出耶穌係完全人都冇關係㗎。

回覆 216# beebeechan
(1)耶穌在最後晚餐時唔係高舉麵餅和酒對門徒說: 「你們要這樣做來紀念我」啵。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:18

記念又冇話獻祭。
你們每逢吃這餅,喝這杯,是表明主的死,直等到他來。係表明主的死,又幾時獻祭?

(2)你既主禱文, 天主教叫天主經,入面一句: 求你賞給我們日用的食糧 (唔係指米飯牛扒海鮮喎, 係指聖體, 耶穌的肉)
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:18

當然係指米飯牛扒海鮮。你有功力你咪詮釋俾我聽點解係"聖體",又點解冇左"聖血"

(3)耶穌亦講過, 佢就係天上降下來的瑪納, 在曠野的以色列人, 不是日日都要收集瑪納養活咩?
乜收咗一日, 就可以收工架嗱?
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:18

點解舊約嘅野黎到新約又生效嘅?你割左包皮未?
人地係食飯,又唔係獻祭。
乜以色列人舊時日日獻祭㗎咩?
嗱嗱嗱,棋盤內車無輪馬無彊呀,瑪納安息日係冇得收㗎,你地天主教徒又點解淨係安息日先去領聖體?SLDPK

經上多處都指向:人要常領聖體, 最好每日都領一次。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:18

我完全見唔到,勞煩你證有不證無啦。如果你係指上面個123,就只能話你全無邏輯。

回覆 217# beebeechan
人死如燈滅, 你講到出口添喇, 所以我先要抦你。
你唔認帳都唔得, 有圖為証。 ...
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:19

我不嬲信永生,從來冇講過人死如燈滅。不過我體諒,捩橫折曲信口雌黃張口就來無中生有係你唯一拎得出手嘅招式,你鍾意點講隨便你。

回覆 218# beebeechan
你既一堆字, 都唔係反駁我既論點: 如死人的聖祖聖人, 冇為人代求的能力, 耶穌咁講就係教錯人喎。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:20

我講左咁耐你都冇聽明白我講嘅野。你嘅一堆字,就算死人聖祖聖人可以向神代求,都冇俾過在生嘅人向死人發出請求。乜你聖品人係自己識為你代求㗎咩?唔洗你出聲㗎?天主教係咪咁教?

回覆 219# beebeechan
乜亞巴郎唔係聖祖?
你又9up乜呀
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 19:31

亞伯拉罕係"聖祖"呀
發出代求果個係"富人"吖嘛,發出代求果個係亞伯拉罕咩?你又9up乜呀?點解一個所謂名校老師,可以喺咁簡單嘅句子裡面連主謂賓都搞L得錯?SLDPK。語文唔識,數學唔識,科學唔識,你教體育?我真係要轉發俾啲叻沙仔嘲吓佢地。

回覆 220# beebeechan
你講到耶穌被釘, 帳幔裂開, 於是人人皆司祭矣。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 20:39

人人皆祭司係你個第一任教皇講㗎。係咪因為耶穌被釘,帳幔裂開,你自己返去睇返佢啲書信啦。我冇講過兩者有因果,我呢刻亦未諗到兩者有冇因果,你就唔洗無中生有我曾講過乜乜乜。咁不過你舉到證嘅我又唔拘,話唔定我都唔記得左自己講過乜野呢。

喂咁你直到現在,有冇可以因為耶穌嘅血入過至聖所呀?冇我就有啲擔心啦。

耶穌的司祭職分施到每一個信徒, 人人可親自獻祭咁。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 20:39

祭司就不嬲舊約都一堆㗎啦。
我就不嬲從來話冇需再獻祭㗎啦,大祭司獻完一次永遠嘅贖罪祭之後就坐低㗎啦。你又再一次虛構我曾講過啲乜乜乜,呢個表現非常persistent吖。
祭司嘅責任,平X福音堂不嬲就係話係將人帶到神前。係唔係最準確嘅講法我冇乜所謂,你有準確啲嘅就提出黎。但總之大祭司獻完一次永遠嘅贖罪祭之後我就無需每年每日獻㗎啦。

梵二教會憲章第62條, (後半部你揞住唔俾大家睇既部份)

既然耶穌的司祭職可以分享出去,
耶穌的中保角色也可以由一個源頭分出去給聖人, 聖祖, 瑪利亞。

你呢啲所為, 又算唔算斷章取義?
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 20:39

後半果段咪一樣係三幅被,同前半講嘅野有咩分別?一樣喺度鳩噏之嘛。我就係睇完都覺得多餘先唔鬼講,乜得你原來視佢如珠如寶?
美善分佈於受造物中,咁受造之物就唔洗服喺虛空之下嘆息啦。有神嘅美善,我點會唔得救要靠信耶穌得㗎。成句咩美善只不過係一段作出黎嘅高大空癈話之嘛。呢個不知所謂嘅美善論,有冇半點聖根據?冇的話我sola scriptura邊洗理你?
聖經就從來冇講祭司係唯一嘅,舊約啲祭司成日都一大堆㗎啦。神係唯一,中保係唯一,呢啲就反而有講喎。
按天主教嘅講法,神嘅唯一都可以分出去吖,所以你咪話百物都係神囉,係咪咁解?
唯一就唯一,好簡單㗎咋,細蚊仔第一個學嘅數字都係一㗎咋。講野一就一,二就二,加多左啲野喺中間就唔係唯一㗎啦。
反正你果套說詞說服唔到我㗎啦,你鍾意咪拎住呢段去說服其他頭腦正常嘅人囉。


話題要轉了嗎?
本帖最後由 jimmychauck 於 2025/7/31 23:16 編輯

回覆 223# beebeechan

正一玻離心,指出你唔啱嘅地方就叫罵街?罵街你咪唔好覆,等大家覺得你有理。
你唔識回就算啦。
回覆 224# beebeechan

我唔係彼得,你唔好搞錯,有咩唔啱你自己通靈同佢講四四六六拆掂佢。
本帖最後由 jimmychauck 於 2025/7/31 23:36 編輯

回覆 227# beebeechan

又話人罵街你仲答?
唔答晒咪即係唔識答囉。

點解舊約嘅野黎到新約又生效嘅?你割左包皮未?
人地係食飯,又唔係獻祭。
乜以色列人舊時日日獻祭㗎咩?
嗱嗱嗱,棋盤內車無輪馬無彊呀,瑪納安息日係冇得收㗎,你地天主教徒又點解淨係安息日先去領聖體?SLDPK
回覆 228# beebeechan
抽水識得多過我佢唔會連邏輯都唔敢同我講啦。
回覆 231# beebeechan

我每樣質疑都係獨立於其他質疑㗎啦,你回唔晒咪即係有回應唔到嘅質疑囉,咪事實認定錯誤囉。
賊佬射你三槍你避彈衣擋左一槍你就唔洗死?你犯左五樣致死嘅罪,告解左一樣就上到天堂?
你回唔到咪回唔到囉,大隻講。
回覆 232# beebeechan

因為我有佢冇佢先唔敢講之嘛,吖你藍絲乜都鍾意掉轉黎講。
本帖最後由 jimmychauck 於 2025/8/1 00:09 編輯

回覆 228# beebeechan

睇左好耐,終於明你喺度戇緊咩鳩。

首先你就斷章刪走頭果句。
人人皆祭司係你個第一任教皇講㗎。係咪因為耶穌被釘,帳幔裂開,你自己返去睇返佢啲書信啦。我冇講過兩者有因果,我呢刻亦未諗到兩者有冇因果,
jimmychauck 發表於 2025/7/31 21:52


我講嘅兩者,前者係人人皆祭司,後者係耶穌被釘+帳幔裂開。

你講到耶穌被釘, 帳幔裂開, 於是人人皆司祭矣。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/7/31 20:39

個兩者係你提出㗎

耶穌被釘+帳幔裂開==>人人皆祭司。呢個戇鳩推論係你推落黎我口㗎嘛,宜家咪同你講個戇鳩理論關我叉事囉。
人人皆祭司係你個第一任教皇講㗎,你反呢句首先反左佢,我排隊都未到俾你反呀,你當我係第一任教皇我就教皇無誤你同我收皮。

你又唔記得自己講乜,又要藍絲講唔過人就轉話題。自己講嘅野全無擔當記性,護教一味迴避人地問題,你呢啲叫做正式錄用嘅天主教徒?

沙文同網主兩個人都從來指出唔到我有咩邏輯錯誤(明明謬誤列表我第一次見到就喺本網),橫掂你都覺得佢地可能得救,你埋去同佢地抱團啦。
本帖最後由 jimmychauck 於 2025/8/1 06:26 編輯

喂你唔識回果啲,回左先,一味開新話題即係轉話題唔識答。

回覆 236# beebeechan
你又錯勒。 人人皆司祭唔係伯多祿創出嚟。 佢只係複述出谷紀19章天主訓示梅瑟, 要佢去轉話的一句:

出谷紀 19:6
但你們為我應成為司祭的國家,聖潔的國民。你應將這些話訓示以色列子民。」
beebeechan 發表於 2025/8/1 01:34

啲野唔係彼得發明,佢為出埃及記背書,就唔代表佢冇講,更加唔代表佢反對或唔認同。

作祭司的國度呢,就根本唔係人人皆祭司,聖經都講得好清楚只有利未支派先係祭司啦,係喺萬民中作唯一有祭司的國。等萬國可以黎以色列朝拜啫。

就要在萬民中作屬我的子民,因為全地都是我的。你們要歸我作祭司的國度,為聖潔的國民。』


咩叫"耶穌未救贖前已經係人人皆司祭, 不過, 天主仍要肋未人當司祭喎",作得就作

即是人人皆司祭時, 不是人人都可以做獻祭的祭司。
正如今日, 人人皆司祭時, 仍要神父當獻祭的祭司。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/8/1 01:34


你好似對舊約好有研究咁喎,咁你唔知祭係分開贖罪之祭同馨香之祭㗎咩?

贖罪之祭我講左N次,大祭司獻完一次永遠嘅贖罪祭之後就坐低㗎啦。你成日話要咩神父司祭星期日先獻得果啲,到底係咩祭?贖罪祭就一早獻完啦,按你咁講即係果啲咩將身體獻上當作活祭果啲就神父司祭先有資格做啦,一般信徒唔俾做啦?

同埋彼得嘅原話都同出埃及記有出入㗎,彼得係話信徒係有君尊嘅祭司嘛,舊約以色列人君王同祭司一定要分開㗎啦。
你天主教咁鍾意喺神耶穌同人中間插個身入黎,根本就係存心要將人同耶穌隔絕,叫人信你唔係信耶穌,所以咪洗腦左一批教會講乜都聽,聖經講乜都當乞嗤嘅張口就來信徒囉。

有基督的血洗淨我嘅罪,我呢,就坦然進入至聖所,你咪繼續喺出面攬住啲咩神父教宗彌撒聖體告解囉。

喂係咪犯左致於死嘅罪就基督嘅血無效必須揾神父告解否則落地獄?從以前開始問左你好多次啦,你捨得答未?


其實成條問題,我一問gemini,個prompt冇任何我想要嘅內容提示,佢都答晒我講嘅野出黎啦。
咪一樣係話,信徒皆祭司,獻靈祭唔係贖罪祭,新舊約有分別,啲野新約先應驗囉。
你完全無視聖經文本意思,詮釋嘅方法,一味照搬天主教教你嘅,你根本就俾人洗左腦。

Q: does 1 peter 2:9 royal priesthood comes from exodus 19:6?

A: Yes, there is a direct and significant connection between 1 Peter 2:9 and Exodus 19:6. In 1 Peter 2:9, the Apostle Peter is quoting from and re-applying the language originally used by God to describe the nation of Israel in the Old Testament.

Let's look at the two passages side-by-side:


  • Exodus 19:6: "and you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation."
  • 1 Peter 2:9: "But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light."


Peter is explicitly taking the titles and promises given to Israel and applying them to New Testament believers, both Jews and Gentiles, who are now part of the Church. This shows a powerful theological continuity and fulfillment.

The Significance of this Connection:


  • Corporate Identity: In the Old Testament, God chose the nation of Israel to be his special people. Peter declares that the Church—the community of believers in Christ—is now this "chosen race" and "holy nation."
  • Priesthood of All Believers: In the Old Covenant, a specific group of people (the Levites and descendants of Aaron) were designated as priests to mediate between God and the people. The promise in Exodus 19:6, that the entire nation would be a "kingdom of priests," was an ideal that found its ultimate fulfillment in the New Covenant. In Christ, all believers have direct access to God and are called to serve as priests.
  • Purpose: Both passages share a common purpose: to "proclaim the excellencies" of God. Israel was meant to be a light to the nations, demonstrating God's character and truth. In the New Testament, the Church's priestly function is to bear witness to the world about the saving work of Christ, who called them out of darkness into light.


In short, Peter uses the language of Exodus 19:6 to demonstrate that the blessings and responsibilities once entrusted to Israel are now fulfilled in the multi-ethnic, global body of Christ.

Q: so why not everyone in the kingdom of priests are priests?

A: The premise of your question—"why not everyone in the kingdom of priests are priests?"—is based on a misunderstanding of what "priesthood" means in the context of the New Testament. The biblical teaching is that every single person within the "kingdom of priests" is a priest.

The confusion often arises from contrasting the New Testament understanding of priesthood with the Old Testament model or with a hierarchical model found in some modern church traditions.

Let's break down the two main points:

1. The Priesthood of All Believers
The phrase "royal priesthood" in 1 Peter 2:9 refers to what is known in Christian theology as the "priesthood of all believers." This concept teaches that every Christian has direct access to God through Jesus Christ, who is our ultimate and only High Priest.

This is a radical departure from the Old Covenant system where:

Only a select few (the descendants of Aaron from the tribe of Levi) were priests.

The priests had a specific, mediating function: offering animal sacrifices and incense on behalf of the people to God.

Only the High Priest could enter the Holy of Holies once a year.

In the New Covenant, through the work of Jesus, all of that changes. The Old Covenant priesthood is now obsolete because Jesus's one-time sacrifice was perfect and sufficient. As a result, the New Testament teaches that all believers share in a spiritual priesthood.

2. The Role and Functions of the New Testament Priest
If every Christian is a priest, what is their function? It's not to offer animal sacrifices, but to offer "spiritual sacrifices" (1 Peter 2:5). These sacrifices include:


  • Offering our bodies as a living sacrifice (Romans 12:1).
  • Praising and worshiping God (Hebrews 13:15).
  • Doing good and sharing with others (Hebrews 13:16).
  • Interceding in prayer for others.

Therefore, according to the New Testament, there is no longer a special class of people (like the Old Testament priests) who act as mediators between God and other believers. The entire community of Christians is the "kingdom of priests" and every member has the privilege and responsibility to perform these spiritual priestly functions.

So, to answer your question directly: everyone in the "kingdom of priests" is a priest in the New Testament sense of the word. They may not hold the specific office of an elder, pastor, or deacon, which are leadership and teaching roles, but they all share in the common priesthood established by Christ.

Q: the kingdom of priests is in old testament exodus, why not everyone in the old testament kingdom of priests a priest?

A: That is an excellent and very perceptive question. It highlights a key distinction between the Old Testament ideal and its practical application, which is then fulfilled in the New Testament.

In the Old Testament, the "kingdom of priests" in Exodus 19:6 had two meanings:

1. The Corporate, National Priesthood (Ideal)
When God told Israel they would be a "kingdom of priests," he was giving them a corporate mission and identity. This meant the entire nation of Israel, as a whole, was to function as a priestly nation to the rest of the world.

Their role: To mediate the knowledge of the one true God to all other nations.

Their purpose: By living according to God's holy law, they were to be a visible testament to God's character and power, showing the world what it meant to have a relationship with the divine. They were to be a beacon of light, drawing other nations to worship God.

In this sense, every Israelite was part of this collective, national priesthood.

2. The Functional, Cultic Priesthood (Reality)
While the entire nation had this high calling, God immediately instituted a specific, functional priesthood for the purpose of ritual and sacrifice. This role was reserved exclusively for the descendants of Aaron from the tribe of Levi.

Their role: To perform the official duties of the Tabernacle and later the Temple. They were the ones who offered animal sacrifices, burned incense, and mediated between a holy God and a sinful people.

The reason for the distinction: The establishment of this specific priestly class was a direct result of humanity's sin and God's absolute holiness. The rest of the nation was not holy enough to handle the sacred objects or perform the rites of atonement. God's holiness was so intense that direct contact could be fatal. The Aaronic priesthood acted as a barrier and a mediator, protecting the people from God's holiness while protecting God's holiness from the people's sinfulness.

A clear example of this tension is found in Exodus 32. After God makes the promise in Exodus 19, the Israelites immediately sin by worshiping the golden calf. This event demonstrates their unholiness and the urgent need for a dedicated, mediating priesthood.

The Fulfillment in the New Testament
The New Testament teaches that Jesus Christ, as our perfect High Priest, fulfills both of these roles.

He is the single, ultimate priest who offered a perfect, once-and-for-all sacrifice, making the Aaronic priesthood obsolete.

Because of His perfect sacrifice, every believer is now made holy in Him. This holiness allows the ideal of the "kingdom of priests" from Exodus 19:6 to finally be realized. Every Christian can now approach God directly and shares in the corporate mission of being a priestly nation, representing God to the world.


話題要轉了嗎?
回覆 237# beebeechan

你呢帖全部都係罵街野。
回覆 240# beebeechan
無錯,舊約裡司祭係一堆。 不過呢堆唔係指一般以色列民, 獨指肋未人啵。

出谷紀19:6既然講到以以列民是司 ...
beebeechan 發表於 2025/8/1 06:50

瞓醒未?"一堆"係用黎破你將祭司職份嘅分發延申落"唯一"嘅中保到。你永遠唔知人地覆緊你乜野嘅?


回覆 241# beebeechan
乜無話可說到要搵gemini , 搵都唔緊要, 仲要有字搬字, 不用過腦
beebeechan 發表於 2025/8/1 06:55

我#238上半都講左成七百字啦,你有眼疾?你四帖加埋中文字得個305個,你更加無話可說?

回覆 242# beebeechan
回覆 243# beebeechan
咁你淨係表演抄我問AI,即係你唔識回#238啦。

#242一睇就知有問題啦。
Both phrases convey the same meaning: a people who are both kings and priests, with direct access to God and a role in serving Him and the world.
beebeechan 發表於 2025/8/1 07:04

都講左舊約以色列人君王同祭司一定要分開㗎啦。
呢啲咪就係傻佬用AI同有識之士用AI嘅分別囉,你唔知AI幾時有幻覺,我知呀,我係寫完最後叫AI揾多啲資料,你係唔識做叫AI幫你做晒吖嘛。


話題要轉了嗎?
回覆 245# 抽刀斷水

聖靈係要把一切的事教導你們,並且讓你們想起我對你們說過的一切,嚴格黎講就冇包讀經,係讀左經之後,見過神的話啦,到唔知咩時候有適合嘅場合就幫你"想起"。

讀經又同研究聖經及同詮釋聖經唔同,唔係話識一兩個buzz word就叫理解晒基督教㗎。
回覆 249# beebeechan
以你呢啲咁既寫作水平....真係唔知你覆緊我乜野架。
字就真係「一堆」勒
你係9, 我係8 咁。 ...
beebeechan 發表於 2025/8/1 19:32
回覆 220# beebeechan
jimmychauck 發表於 2025/7/31 21:52

標題已寫清楚係"回覆 220#",作為一個老師都唔識睇題目錄(或者其實連自己講過乜,引過乜,都唔知),就只能稱你為失敗。


回覆 253# beebeechan
你真係要惡補一下舊約經書, 唔好淨係睇福音, 聽牧師亂翕 (亂翕到你都要跺清xx堂既塵土咁講)
乜大司祭只係一年做一次咁爽架?? 唔係囉。
beebeechan 發表於 2025/8/1 19:57
贖罪之祭我講左N次,大祭司獻完一次永遠嘅贖罪祭

舊約嘅祭司邊個有曾獻上永遠嘅贖罪祭?
連咁簡單嘅排除法都唔識?你有臉面話我冇邏輯?簡直老鼠上天平。
RSV Heb 10:12 But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God

你一係就唔記得自己話耶穌大祭司過大祭司。
一係你就覺得自己講過嘅係癈嘅冇參考價值。
一係你冇讀過呢段神嘅話。
一係你冇聖靈提醒你想起呢段神嘅話。
一係你自己轉數太慢。

我自己揀啦。我冇補充。


話題要轉了嗎?
回覆 251# beebeechan

寫真集對你黎講都係神嘅話,咁所以聖經外你咪有其他權威囉。你係咪可以叫聖公會路德宗信義會果啲去幫你認證吓啲寫真集係咪關佢地事?
回覆 248# 抽刀斷水

1Jn 4:1  親愛的弟兄啊,一切的靈,你們不可都信,總要試驗那些靈是出於神的不是,因為世上有許多假先知已經出來了。 
1Jn 4:2  凡靈認耶穌基督是成了肉身來的,就是出於神的;從此你們可以認出神的靈來。 
1Jn 4:3  凡靈不認耶穌,就不是出於神;這是那敵基督者的靈。

Gal 5:22  聖靈所結的果子,就是仁愛、喜樂、和平、忍耐、恩慈、良善、信實、 
Gal 5:23  溫柔、節制。這樣的事沒有律法禁止。 

Mat 7:15  「你們要防備假先知。他們到你們這裡來,外面披著羊皮,裡面卻是殘暴的狼。 
Mat 7:16  憑著他們的果子,就可以認出他們來。

加埋咪解到囉。

驗靈有驗靈嘅方法,聖靈有聖靈嘅果子俾你認出,叫你想起啲經文走去殺人放火果啲就斷估唔係聖靈啦。斷估聖靈感動一個人,就唔會叫佢無中生有其他人冇講過嘅說話去gaslight人地嘅。

魔鬼都熟聖經,但次次都係斷章取義㗎,咁啱耶穌仲熟聖經,咪睇到佢嘅教導違反另外啲經文囉,你見魔鬼出三招,耶穌三次都係經上(又)記著說,就知道最老土嘅招式夠晒用啦。呢個故事教訓我地,一個人唔以經解經解到冇矛盾,斷章取義隨口噏,其他人提佢另外經文唔係咁講,佢閉口不回無動於衷依然故我,就只不過係魔鬼咁嘅level啫。

你兩次問嘅問題,什至平時問開嘅問題,聖經度成日有解答㗎,不過你話你自己嘥夠時間已唔會再睇(而繼續慕唔知咩道)吖嘛,咁就有啲野你係無從稽考㗎啦。
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個