返回列表 回覆 發帖

萬事萬物皆有定時

若非天主親自啟示,人絕無可能明白祂的意念和計劃
逃出魔幻紀 發表於 2023/12/9 20:55



    既然係咁,你搞咁多做乜呀? 講來講去, 不就是脫褲放屁?
回覆 10# beebeechan


    自從生子女既風氣淡薄,以及離婚普及後,老婆同普通女朋友既界線就越來越模糊了,而女朋友同one night stand既分別都不再明顯。飲食男女,好速食架。

以前大住個肚結婚好難睇,依家啲人唔大肚都唔會諗住結,今時唔同往日。

呢個世界變得好快,教會唔好以為可以再用結婚黎要脅啲人做啲乜,例如中世紀教會利用婚姻都cap唔少水,而時至今日好多教堂依然要兩人都要基督徒才准許行禮,等等。
點樣 cap 到水?
beebeechan 發表於 2023/12/12 08:28



   
As to where the money came from, the Church possessed endowments. Individuals over the centuries gave lands and money, particularly to support monasteries since monks could not go out into the world and earn money for themselves. The clergy of the parish churches were supported by tithes and offerings. Tithes were the most important part of their income, allowing them to receive a tenth of agricultural production – corn, barley and rye, and one tenth of newborn animals – calves, piglets, lambs, as well as honey, milk, cheese and so on. Offerings of money formed a smaller part of clergy income. They were made four times of the year and at baptisms, marriages and funerals. Parish sizes and wealth varied hugely from one to another, so being a parish priest didn’t indicate what income you might receive. Incomes could vary from as much as £80 or £100 a year to as little as £3 or £4.


https://www.historyextra.com/per ... ddle-ages-religion/

離婚都有水cap:

In many of these cases, it was the lack of sufficient evidence which made them difficult to prove and this may have deterred people from taking their cases to the Church courts. Money was also an obstacle. Marital disputes among the nobility are the most well documented, as they had the means to pursue this expensive course of action. Occasionally we get a glimpse into the potential costs involved in a suit of divorce.  For example, in 1531 the divorce between Elizabeth and Henry Savill accrued fees of £20 (E135/7/26). In today’s money, this would amount to about £7,000.  This meant that often those from humbler backgrounds settled disputes amongst themselves by choosing to live apart.



https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/till-death-us-part-divorce-medieval-england/

都未計重婚、捉姦果啲贖罪罰款啦。
如離婚係cap水
點解又設重重關卡斷自己水源?



唔合邏輯
beebeechan 發表於 2023/12/12 23:55



    結婚執啲,離婚執啲,通姦又執啲,重婚又執啲,收入幾多元化丫。
點解英皇享利八世咁大個 order 都唔執既?
beebeechan 發表於 2023/12/13 11:46



    係利八世吧,可能係以為可以討價還價叫價高啲,點知人家索性創立新教派,咁你又吹佢唔脹。
回覆 25# beebeechan


    我唔知你係講享利八世定係亨利八世,紅字改了你仍是享。

好似大部分人一樣,錢無話無,睇下值唔值得畀咁解。
不過没有任何史料是說教廷要亨利俾錢先批準佢休妻。
亦無史料話亨利嫌貴唔肯俾。

一切與$$$$無關喎 ...
beebeechan 發表於 2023/12/13 18:36



    無史料但唔能夠抹殺呢個可能性,我一早就講咗係「可能」。

呢個世界好多野都係暗地裡進行,唔通樣樣野都要話你知咩。

返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個