回復 104# dye
An excellent conclusion for yourself, dye…
I never have expected you to be this serious on the topic. That day I started all these conversations, I was just bored and joined a few of the forum discussions. As you have said that you would like the conversation to be stopped right here, then let it be. However, such action has given me a very strong feeling of you are trying to run away from the fact that you yourself know there are obvious flaws in your explanations, and that your explanations can easily be denied.
Below are for the information to others who would like to know the flaw in dye’s explanation and his(her) ignorance:
First, he(she) is focusing too much on signs and notice. All examples above given by dye are stating that the use of signs alone is NOT enough. I agree. ALL precaution steps must be taken as well in order to be free from responsibilities. However, the whole discussion here is not about NOT taking precaution steps, but is about people’s disobedience of the precautions.
Secondly, he(she) is ignoring the reason of why such the hazard exists. Let’s talk about the bomb in the market. Dye keeps insist that if one puts the bomb there and not taking it away, that person is guilty. However, if the purpose of the bomb has not been fulfilled (things meant to be blown have not been blown), why should one takes away the bomb from the area?
Let’s apply this concept back to the tree of wisdom. This tree is a test for human’s obedience to God. If this test were meant to last for X years, why should God takes away the tree if it is still within the X years period? God has specifically told Adam and Eve NOT to eat from that tree, and have made sure that they understand and knowing why. All notice and “precautions” have been given and done by God already. The disobedience to God’s notice and “precautions” has nothing to blame God for.
Great, that’s that. In my opinion, blasting out all the words and just stating “This is the conclusion” is an act of a baby. If dye is to believe what is wrong, it is his(her) choice. For others who would like to find out more, we can continue. |
2010/7/16 11:16
| 
