沙文

靚嗰啲囉

沙文

另外有一單暗藏唔否定進化嘅經文, 關於一個人物。煲紅豆沙嗰個雅各嘅孖生大佬, 毛鬙鬙厄撒烏: “首先產出的發紅，渾身是毛，如披毛裘，給他起名厄撒烏。”
其實這就是一種人類返祖現象(atavism),  歷史記載在人類社會一直都有發生
https://www.cerebromente.org.br/n09/fastfacts/atavismo_i.htm
https://medievaldisabilityglossary.hcommons.org/hypertrichosis/

沙文

而家都得㗎, 仲深過用樽好多


男




女

沙文

根據關我叉事教, 用耶穌家譜計, 由亞當到耶穌77代, 計到盡:
Bishop James Ussher (17th Century): In his widely influential 1654 chronology, Ussher calculated the creation of Adam at 4004 BC, placing the birth of Jesus roughly 4,000 years later. This timeline was historically printed in the margins of many King James Version Bibles. [1, 2]  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology
東方傳統70士譯本就推出5,500
https://www.scribd.com/document/ ... m-Adam-to-Jesus-1-1
姣思頓督基督教大學就話:
https://hc.edu/museums/dunham-bi ... m-adam-unto-christ/
其他計算都係幾千年更上下:
https://answersingenesis.org/age-of-the-earth/it-all-adds/
https://amazingbibletimeline.com ... the-bible-timeline/


根據無知的科學佬狗噏, Homo sapiens 至少30萬年前出現:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human


所以, 300000:6000 = 50:1


但係癲鼠教就冇official calculation for the age of Homo sapiens.
咁, 唔知貴教”唔否定進化”又係點樣計嘅呢?

沙文

最大嘅問題, 喺啲科學佬用Thermoluminescence dating來斷定年份。
但係, Thermoluminescence dating根本就完全冇聖經根據! 聖經幾時有話過可以用Thermoluminescence dating來推斷年份呢?

沙文

係呀係呀, 嗰啲什麼提塔利克魚化石, 其實係上帝特登整出嚟整蠱科學佬嘅啫

老實講, 如果我好似上帝咁得閒, 我都會咁樣玩

貴教之所謂”唔否定進化”, 意思其實係嗰啲化石只不過係道具嚟嘅, 係咪咁意思呢?

沙文

不過咁,如果話呢個世界, 全部歷史包括你嘅記憶、聖經、降生釘十字架嘅紀錄......, 係一分鐘前先至被創造嘅, 咁又一樣得㗎喎

沙文

親愛的版友, 唔係樣樣都好似聖經咁可以老作過喎
您查詢的「扎海爾米足跡」在公開的歷史、地理、影視或時事資料庫中並無完全吻合的特定條目或知名事件。這可能是一個特定小說情節、虛擬遊戲設定，或者是音譯/筆誤上的拼寫差異

沙文

根本未有定論嘅

The status of the Zachełmie trackways remains a subject of active debate, making them not yet universally "confirmed" but widely recognized as a highly compelling piece of evidence in paleontological science.
While the original discoverers and prominent paleontologists like Per Ahlberg strongly support the tetrapod origin, a segment of the scientific community maintains skepticism, largely due to the radical implications the tracks have on our understanding of tetrapod evolution.

The Core Debate

• The Pro-Tetrapod Evidence: The researchers who discovered the tracks in Poland argue that the clear presence of digit impressions (toes and heel pads), a distinct diagonal quadrupedal walking gait, and the total absence of a body or tail drag are features unique to limbed land-dwellers. They argue these tracks could not have been left by lobe-finned fish.
• The Skeptical Counter-Argument: Critics (such as paleontologist Spencer Lucas) have countered that the structures could be undertracks (deformed lower layers of sediment), fish nesting mounds, or feeding traces left by primitive fish in shallow water. Some scientists have emphasized that without skeletal body fossils from the exact same time period, ichnotaxa (fossil tracks) are inherently difficult to prove definitively.

Why Is It So Controversial?

The primary reason for the pushback is the age of the tracks. Securely dated to roughly 395–397 million years old (Middle Devonian), the Zachełmie tracks predate famous transitional "fishapod" fossils like Tiktaalik by more than 10 million years.
If confirmed as true tetrapod tracks, it means fully formed, limb-bearing land vertebrates were already walking around long before the species we once thought were their direct ancestors even existed. This forces scientists to rethink the timeline, implying that animals like Tiktaalik were late-surviving evolutionary "relics" or examples of convergent evolution rather than our direct ancestors.

Current Status

Subsequent geological studies have shifted to analyzing the environment where the tracks were made. While originally thought to be a marine tidal flat, newer sediment studies suggest the tracks were left in a freshwater environment of drying, ephemeral lakes. This shift heavily favors the original tetrapod hypothesis, as it matches an animal capable of walking on dry or semi-dry land. Despite this, until an actual skeleton from that era is dug up in Poland, the tracks will likely remain a brilliant but contested piece of the evolutionary puzzle.
Are you researching the Zachełmie tracks for a paleontology course, or are you looking into how they impact the evolutionary timeline of Tiktaalik? Let me know, and we can dive deeper into either topic!
•
Wikipedia
Zachelmie trackways - Wikipedia
Narkiewicz, co-author of the article on the Zachelmie trackways, claimed that the Polish "discovery has disproved the theory that ...
•
National Geographic
Fossil tracks push back the invasion of land by 18 million years | National Geographic
Discovery: 395-million-year-old tetrapod tracks in Poland's Zachelmie Quarry push back the land invasion by 18 million years. Cont...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zachelmie_trackways

沙文

即係條魚既曾曾曾曾曾孫可以同條魚既曾曾曾曾祖父年代出現。即係話陸地動物在條比提塔利克魚出現前便已存在。唔係由比提塔利克魚進化出嚟

你話奇唔奇?
beebeechan 發表於 2026/10/30 18:25

奇又唔係認真好奇。嗰陣時啲嘢係話咁易就絕種嘅, 或者這種陸地動物出現嗰一陣就絕咗種, 二千萬年之後由提塔利克魚進化四足, 咁先至成功繁殖。

即係好似古人類咁樣, 有好多種, 不過其他絕曬種死淨我哋信耶穌

沙文

小學嗰陣啲先生都係咁叫我㗎啦, 冇得改㗎喇

沙文

諗落, 其實耶穌真係要感恩。如果唔係死淨你哋, 邊L度有人信耶穌呢?