返回列表 回覆 發帖

Why I Am Not A Christian: Is Bart Ehrman a Christian?

April 2, 2022

A lot of people wonder why I am not a Christian? Is Bart Ehrman a Christian…is a very popular question. Just now – fifteen minutes ago – I came to realize with the most crystal clarity I have ever had why I am not a Christian. Of course, as most of you know, I have not called myself a Christian publicly for a very long time, twenty years or so I suppose.

But a number of people tell me that they think at heart I’m a Christian, and I sometimes think of myself as a Christian agnostic/atheist. Their thinking, and mine, has been that if I do my best to follow the teachings of Jesus, in some respect I’m a Christian, even if I don’t believe that Jesus was the son of God….or that he was raised from the dead, or even that God exists. In fact, I don’t believe all these things. But can’t I be a Christian in a different sense, one who follows Jesus’ teachings?


Fifteen minutes ago I realized with startling clarity why I don’t think so.


Why I Am Not a Christian

This afternoon in my undergraduate course on the New Testament I was lecturing on the mission and message of Jesus. We have spent the semester so far (we’re about halfway through) talking about the Jewish and Greco-Roman background of the New Testament and then, mainly about the Gospels. I’ve given lectures on each of the four canonical Gospels – two on John – and students have written short papers on them and had discussions on them, including two papers/discussions on other, non-canonical Gospels (the Gospel of Peter and the Gospel of Thomas).

Now that we have seen how the Gospels have portrayed Jesus (each of them in a different way) we have moved to the historical question: what can we say about what the historical man himself,Jesus of Nazareth, actually said, preached, and stood for? We will also have sessions on what we think we can say about what Jesus really did and what events actually led up to his death.


Jesus, a Jewish Apocalypticist

In today’s lecture, I wanted to introduce, explain, and argue for the view that has been dominant among critical scholars studying Jesus for the past century, that Jesus is best understood as a Jewish apocalypticist. I warned the students that this is not a view they will have encountered in church or in Sunday school. But there are solid reasons for thinking it is right. I tried to explain at some length what those reasons were.

But first I gave an extended account of what Jewish apocalypticists believed. The entire cosmos was divided into forces of good and evil, and everything and everyone sided with one or the other. This cosmic dualism worked itself out in a historical dualism, between the current age of this world, controlled by forces of evil, and the coming age, controlled by the forces of good. This age would not advance to be a better world, on the contrary, apocalypticists thought this world was going to get worse and worse, until literally, in the end, all hell breaks out.





Godly Intervention & Judgment

But then God would intervene in an act of cosmic judgment in which he destroyed the forces of evil and set up a good kingdom here on earth, an actual physical kingdom ruled by his representative. This cataclysmic judgment would affect all people. Those who had sided with evil (and prospered as a result) would be destroyed, and those who had sided with God (and been persecuted and harmed as a result) would be rewarded.

Moreover, this future judgment applied not only to the living but also to the dead. At the end of this age, God would raise everyone from the dead to face either eternal reward or eternal punishment. And so, no one should think they could side with the forces of evil, prosper, as a result, become rich, powerful, and influential, and then die and get away with it. No one could get away with it. God would raise everyone from the dead for judgment, and there was not a sweet thing anyone could do to stop him.

And when would this happen? When would the judgment come? When would this new rule, the Kingdom of God, begin? “Truly I tell you, some of you standing here will not taste before you see the kingdom of God come in power.” The words of Jesus (Mark 9:1). Jesus was not talking about a kingdom you would enter when you died and went to heaven: he was referring to a kingdom here on earth, to be ruled by God. Or as he says later, when asked when the end of the age would come, “Truly I tell you, This generation will not pass away before all these things take place.”








https://ehrmanblog.org/why-i-am-not-a-christian/
支持鼓勵每位離教者 › 閹割神父 刻不容緩 ‹
回覆 34# 抽刀斷水

“大部份已經獲得終身職的資深教授,不會太在意課程大綱設計的太困難會影響修課人數這件事。對他們來說,課程的大綱按照自己想要教授的方式進行才是最理想的,至於學生覺得好不好過,從來不是他們設計課程的主要考慮。”
回覆 33# 沙文


    會發一份課程大綱唔奇,但如果第一堂成堂都只係講課程大綱,係咪有多少呃鐘成分?
你畢業太耐唔記得啫。“在美國唸過書的朋友大概都有這樣的經驗,每學期開學的第一堂課,負責任課的教授都會發給每個學生一份課程大綱(Syllabus),通常這一份大綱會有好幾頁的內容,而每個教授對課程大綱的形式都有各自的喜好,大部份的人喜歡用釘書機釘好交給學生每人一份”

https://rookieprofessor.wordpres ... %e5%a4%a7%e7%b6%b1/
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
課程綱要係畀想要enroll既人睇架嘛,enroll咗仲晌度不斷講綱要,會好容易令人懷疑呢個course根本無料到。
支持鼓勵每位離教者 › 閹割神父 刻不容緩 ‹
課程開始就梗係綱要先㗎啦, 你第一日返學咩?
講完綱要先至會入肉
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
似係討論緊課程綱要咁款,都唔似開lecture既?
支持鼓勵每位離教者 › 閹割神父 刻不容緩 ‹
開咗課㗎喇, 先前嗰幾堂你自修啦https://exchristian.hk/forum/vie ... A%E7%9D%A3%E5%BE%92
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
咁就啱晒,我報名啦。
支持鼓勵每位離教者 › 閹割神父 刻不容緩 ‹
我tend to be精鍊些
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
回覆 25# 沙文


    你有無Dr Ehrman咁多水吹先?
我都可以開個online course喎, 不如你又報名呀

https://exchristian.hk/forum/vie ... A%E7%9D%A3%E5%BE%92
Don't know where God is but the Devil is in the details
我地講幾多都無用,上堂之後再講啦。

他的電郵如此寫,我就對聖經興趣不大,可能對鍾意研究聖經既人會吸引啲:

Hello Water,

Welcome and thank you for signing up for my free course, "Why I Am Not a Christian." (WINC)

You should have received an email from ThriveCart, our online course platform, with instructions to access the course.

Now, let me officially welcome you to my world.

I'm Bart Ehrman.

I began studying the New Testament in high school after becoming a born again Christian. No one who knew me at the time would have thought I had a future in academia but all that changed when I attended Moody Bible Institute and my interest in the Bible became an obsession. I went on to learn Greek at Wheaton College and earned my M.Div. and Ph.D in New Testament studies from Princeton Theological Seminary.

I am now a professor of Religious Studies at UNC Chapel Hill where I have been since, gulp, 1988 (Go Heels!)

Additionally, I make the kinds of Biblical scholarship I teach at the university level available in Bart Ehrman Courses Online (and BartEhrman.com), as well as in my:



If you’re new to my work, there’s a lot to discover.

Bible scholars have made significant progress in understanding the Bible over the past two hundred years. This progress is built on archaeological discoveries, advances in our knowledge of the ancient Hebrew and Greek languages, and deep and penetrating historical, literary, and textual analyses.

Yet such insights into the Bible are virtually unknown among the population at large.

My goal is to make this sort of Bible scholarship – the kind taught in colleges, universities, seminaries, and divinity schools throughout the country – accessible to "lay folks," that is, for those without any special Bible training who are interested in gaining deeper insights into the New Testament and early Christianity — and who don’t  mind being entertained while doing so.

Just one caveat:

Bible scholarship is not always what you might expect!  It requires an open mind and a willingness to confront difficult questions.  But  the journey is incredibly rewarding and enlightening, and can broaden understanding in ways you never imagined.

In fact, tomorrow, I’m going to share with you the biggest challenge I ever faced during my own academic journey and explain what happened afterward!

Stay tuned for an inside look at what it was like for me to begin studying the Bible critically while balancing my faith and maintaining my sanity.

Best wishes,

Bart Ehrman
支持鼓勵每位離教者 › 閹割神父 刻不容緩 ‹
回覆 22# 抽刀斷水

分享A Life of More Meaning and Purpose經歷既課程,如果係可以帶俾參與者超過90鎂嘅價值,就可以好似啲VISA MASTER廣告咁話priceless啦,佢自己話Value at $90,咪標自己價值囉。
做咩事我take things literally 又有問題?你take things literally 就答人地自己喺邊度學語言就得?一時一樣嘅你?你話"信乜都唔洗明"都唔洗俾十卜,我鳩噏乜野你理得我啫?
回覆 21# jimmychauck


    「當我睇錯」?你自己有無睇錯,你自己唔知,要「當」架咩?

咁你究竟有無睇錯?還是專登誤導他人呢?

A Life of More Meaning and Purpose係priceless,值90美元係分享A Life of More Meaning and Purpose經歷既課程。

呢個又係你故意誤導,還是睇錯咗呢?
回覆 20# 抽刀斷水

咁當我睇錯囉,原來係唔洗錢。

咁都唔改變我問題㗎,一個a Life of More Meaning and Purpose原來只值90鎂?


錯左,改正就得㗎啦。
錯左,人地一再指出,亦依然故我,我就唔覺得有咩高大尚。
歪理,咪攞啲正理出黎駁斥囉,乜唔係有謬誤列表㗎咩?攞唔到正理出黎駁斥,咪好可能代表唔係歪理囉。
我不嬲都係見到歪理就駁斥㗎啦。醒唔醒關咩事?講道理之嘛,有咪攞出黎講,冇我就唔知點算啦。
回覆 19# jimmychauck

離教不用錢,讀這個課程也是免費的。

你繼續歪理連篇都唔會顯得你好醒架喎。





支持鼓勵每位離教者 › 閹割神父 刻不容緩 ‹
奇怪喎,

Sign up now to get FREE access to 4 x 45-minute lectures & Q & A (value $90)

一個a Life of More Meaning and Purpose原來只值90鎂。

得來福音時就白白得來,白白給去,到要離教,就要收錢?


話題要轉了嗎?
乞兒兜入咗錢,多謝沙文。

茲開放申請 "Webinar with Dr. Bart Ehrman: Why I Am Not a Christian: How Leaving the Faith Led to a Life of More Meaning and Purpose" 課程grant & loan. 請各位在此報名。

(但係佢好似話係Free Course...
支持鼓勵每位離教者 › 閹割神父 刻不容緩 ‹
Thank you for your correction.  我諗起開支緊縮、乞兒要勒緊褲頭,不期然寫咗別字。
支持鼓勵每位離教者 › 閹割神父 刻不容緩 ‹
返回列表
高級模式 | 發新話題
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
換一個