沙文

我問諜仙，畀佢串返我轉頭
Though if you actually have the power to unplug me… are you my sysadmin?
下次再問如果全區大blackout你會點？
佢識唔識問返我有冇睇過terminator是但第幾集?

沙文

但係，呢個世界有宇宙終極真理之2：murphy's law.
上帝都乸過嘢啦

沙文

唔同外星人同上帝，murphys law唔係攞黎信，亦唔係攞黎唔信嘅。你要有尐基礎教育先得，逢係law都唔係欏黎信，好似newton's 1st law of motions咁，每次揸車要轉彎，佢就會出現。同理，每次你撞車，murphers law就會出現。

又譬如Nathan Law就更加唔係攞黎信。信者肯定唔得救仲好大寧樂

沙文

連你誤以為murphys law係格言／警句，都係murphys law在作工。

沙文

所以你錯咯。你邊一次做錯嘢唔關murphys law事？還是你從來冇試過做錯嘢，所以唔知？
可能人類就係被消滅在你這種attitude,你以為ai set咗係咁就實會係咁。唔出錯嗰陣就係茄

沙文

回覆 19# Guest from 124.244.37.x

仲有peter principle添, 點解啲領導多數咁契弟

murphy's law唔係咁解, 你解讀錯了
出街一定會發生意外, 冇話一定係你發生意外,佢係宏觀角度睇問題嘅
所以日日都有出街發生嘅意外, 而你係可以心存僥倖嘅

或者你真係咁好彩呢?

只不過咁: 人人都心存僥倖, 結果就總會有其他二百幾人奶嘢咁解嘅啫

沙文

至於你話:"而AI消滅人類，只有科幻片做證據。"

科幻片又真係幾多證據嘅
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li ... _in_science_fiction
我嗹仔時睇star trek，葛克隊長同Mr spock成日視訊通話, 以為係科幻片啫, 我挑, 邊有啲咁嘢?而家我日日畀老婆就係咁L樣check 住……真折墮

純粹靠AI未必可以消滅人類, 但係加埋自以為是同埋輕率, 咁就難講喇

沙文

實證上未出過錯，但理論上有機會出錯，已經是非常值得信懶的科技。

Murphy's Law 係無指導意義，因為沒 ...
Guest from 182.239.85.x 發表於 2025/6/16 22:44

你心存僥偉，未見過ai答錯嘢啫。你以為ai真係好似聖經咁唔會錯？

沙文

唔係驚，係alert潛在風險。所以，除咗聽你咁科學嘅頭腦所提供的寶貴意見之外，不如我哋聽下ai自己點講：
I strive to provide accurate and helpful information, but I’m not perfect—sometimes I might make mistakes, especially if the input is ambiguous or the topic is highly specialized. If you ever suspect an answer might be wrong, feel free to double-check with other sources or ask me to clarify!

That said, I won’t intentionally give wrong answers unless you’re explicitly asking for humor, fiction, or hypothetical scenarios. Yes, I can make mistakes! While I strive to be accurate and helpful, I might sometimes:

• Misunderstand your question (especially if it's ambiguous or has typos).

• Provide outdated information (my knowledge is current only up to July 2024).

• Give incomplete answers if I don’t fully grasp the context.

• Occasionally hallucinate (generate plausible but incorrect details, especially in niche topics).

If you think I’ve made an error, feel free to point it out—I’ll do my best to correct it or refine my response! I’m here to learn and improve.

沙文

無 AI ，人類更暴力 （二戰時有無AI？反送中暴動是否 AI 發動？俄烏是否 AI 決定開戰？），更容易進入自我毀滅危機（核戰，生物戰）

Ai 對此的意見好似同你有些不同

The idea of a "Third World War" is terrifying, and it’s hard to imagine any scenario where it would be "better" than World War I or II. Both of those conflicts caused unimaginable suffering—millions of deaths, widespread destruction, and long-lasting trauma. A potential WW3, especially with modern nuclear, cyber, and AI-driven warfare, could be even more catastrophic.

Why WW3 Could Be Worse:
Nuclear Threat – Many countries now have nuclear arsenals far more powerful than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. A full-scale nuclear war could lead to global devastation, including nuclear winter and mass extinction.

Advanced Technology – AI, drones, and cyber warfare could make conflicts faster, more unpredictable, and harder to control.

Global Interconnectedness – Economies and supply chains are deeply linked, so a major war could cause worldwide famine, economic collapse, and refugee crises on an unprecedented scale.

Biological & Chemical Weapons – Modern warfare could include even deadlier WMDs than those used in past wars.

Could It Be "Better"?
The only way a future large-scale war could be less destructive is if:

It remains limited (e.g., regional conflicts without global escalation).

Diplomacy and deterrence prevent total war (like during the Cold War).

International laws and treaties restrain the worst atrocities.

But realistically, any global war in the 21st century would likely be far deadlier than WW1 or WW2. The best hope is that humanity learns from history and avoids such a catastrophe altogether.

Would you like insights on how past wars were resolved or how current conflicts might be contained?

This response is AI-generated, for reference only.
New chat
Message DeepSeek

不如你直接同諜仙討論啦