Question: Discuss the certainty of history before 2000 bce vs the certainty of history of life and evolution

Answer:
**History before 2000 BCE** - Low to moderate certainty. As stated earlier, our knowledge of this time period is based largely on archaeology and the few surviving written sources.

**Evolutionary Biology and History of Life** - High certainty. The theory of evolution is one of the most robust theories in all of science and is supported by a wide array of evidence from many different fields, including paleontology, genetics, comparative anatomy, and biogeography. While there is still ongoing research to determine the specific paths of evolution and to fill in gaps in the fossil record, the overall framework of evolution is extremely well-established.

In comparison, we can say that our understanding of the history of life and evolution is more certain than our understanding of human history before 2000 BCE. This is because the evidence for evolution comes from a wide variety of sources and involves a broad consensus across multiple fields of science. In contrast, our understanding of early human history is based on a narrower set of evidence and can be more subject to interpretation and debate.

Question: Why we consider history before 4000 years are less reliable than history before million years before , as evolution consider the history of millions and billions years ago

Answer:
The difference in certainty between early human history and the history of life and evolution comes down to the types of evidence we have and how we interpret it.

**Human History Before 2000 BCE** - Our knowledge of early human history is primarily based on historical records, archaeology, and anthropology. However, the further back we go, the scarcer these records and artifacts become. This scarcity, combined with the fact that many early civilizations did not have written languages, makes it challenging to build a detailed and accurate picture of human societies and events before 2000 BCE. Furthermore, the evidence we do have often requires significant interpretation, which can lead to differing opinions among historians and archaeologists.

**Evolutionary Biology and History of Life** - In contrast, the evidence supporting the theory of evolution comes from a wide range of scientific disciplines, including paleontology, geology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. Fossil records provide direct evidence of life forms that existed millions of years ago, and genetic studies allow us to trace the lineage of species back to common ancestors. Additionally, geological evidence, such as the layers of rock in the Earth's crust, helps us establish a timeline for the evolution of life.

While both fields have gaps and areas of uncertainty, the evidence supporting the theory of evolution is more extensive and comes from a wider range of sources. Furthermore, the principles and methods used in fields like genetics and geology are based on well-established physical laws, which adds to the certainty of our conclusions. On the other hand, the interpretation of historical and archaeological evidence can be more subjective and often depends on our understanding of the cultural and societal context, which can be less certain.

beebeechan

AI ChatGPT 既回答, 可以調校出你想要的答案, 只要你懂問, 懂用甚麼字眼


Question: discuss reliability of evolution


Answer:

.......

Despite its reliability and extensive supporting evidence, the theory of evolution, like all scientific theories, continues to be subject to ongoing research, refinement, and expansion as new discoveries are made. However, it is essential to note that the reliability of evolution as a scientific theory is well-established and has stood up to rigorous testing and scrutiny for over a century.

你問CHATGPT的回覆，仍然係話演化論可靠

翻譯你的回答

雖然演化論有可靠性及廣泛的證據支持，但它跟其他科學理論都係一樣，會隨著新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。然而，必需指出的是，進化論作為科學證據的可靠性已經得到充份證實，並受到超過一個世紀的嚴格測試及審查。

第二條問題

Question: Why we consider history for more than 1 million years ago (i.e. history of life and history of evolution) are often more reliable than history between 10000BCE and 2000BCE

Answer:
When we discuss the reliability of historical records, it's important to distinguish between different types of historical records and the methods used to study them.

For history in the period of 10,000 BCE to 2,000 BCE, our primary sources of information are archaeological artifacts, ancient texts, and oral histories. These sources can sometimes be unreliable due to factors like the decay or destruction of artifacts, the potential for human error or bias in record-keeping, and the difficulties in accurately interpreting and translating ancient languages.

On the other hand, the history of life and evolution spanning millions of years is studied using different methods, primarily in the field of paleontology. Fossils, geological formations, and genetic information give us clues about the development of life on Earth. These types of evidence are subject to different kinds of uncertainties, such as gaps in the fossil record and the complexities of interpreting ge wenetic data.

(修正）

第二條問題

Question: Why we consider history for more than 1 million years ago (i.e. history of life and history of evolution) are often more reliable than history between 10000BCE and 2000BCE

Answer:
When we discuss the reliability of historical records, it's important to distinguish between different types of historical records and the methods used to study them.

For history in the period of 10,000 BCE to 2,000 BCE, our primary sources of information are archaeological artifacts, ancient texts, and oral histories. These sources can sometimes be unreliable due to factors like the decay or destruction of artifacts, the potential for human error or bias in record-keeping, and the difficulties in accurately interpreting and translating ancient languages.

On the other hand, the history of life and evolution spanning millions of years is studied using different methods, primarily in the field of paleontology. Fossils, geological formations, and genetic information give us clues about the development of life on Earth. These types of evidence are subject to different kinds of uncertainties, such as gaps in the fossil record and the complexities of interpreting genetic data.

However, these scientific methods often allow us to create a more comprehensive and consistent picture of the past, as they are based on physical evidence and are subject to rigorous testing and verification. The vast timescales involved also mean that we're less likely to see the kind of rapid, localized changes that can make certain periods of human history difficult to study.

beebeechan

雖然演化論有可靠性及廣泛的證據支持，但它跟其他科學理論都係一樣，會隨著新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。然而，必需指出的是，進化論作為科學證據的可靠性已經得到充份證實，並受到超過一個世紀的嚴格測試及審查。
Guest from 124.217.137.x 發表於 2023/7/27 19:12

你唔睇到呢段前後腳有矛盾咩?
既然有「充份証實」,, 有何需「會隨著新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展」???

好似有條友話..我好叠水架.....不過我日日要慳啲使錢

beebeechan

雖然演化論有可靠性及廣泛的證據支持，但它跟其他科學理論都係一樣，會隨著新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。然而，必需指出的是，
Guest from 124.217.137.x 發表於 2023/7/27 19:12

你幾時聽過「冷縮熱漲」係要「新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。」

beebeechan

呢位匿名遊客124217137, 成日拎啲chatGPT嚟, 好似當AI 都係咁講啵, 我岩!

好快, AI, 就會被「神」化咗, 只差在未對AI 焚香參拜

你唔睇到呢段前後腳有矛盾咩?
既然有「充份証實」,, 有何需「會隨著新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展 ...

呢個絕對沒有任何矛盾

這就是科學精神，
科學不是講求完美證據完全證實，
而是要講求提供一個「可證偽」的，
有公開透明的研究過程和實驗

科學就係不斷完善
科學不是絕對真理，
但科學會用最好的方式研究探索達至認識及接近真理

即係電腦也不是完美的產品
但肯定係人類史上最厲害的發明之一

而一些聲稱自己係真理，聲稱無需再探索或改善的，
往往係騙局、或迷信、或無知的表現，
他們除咗發明了一個不可證偽的概念和想象，
並沒有其他東西發明到

你幾時聽過「冷縮熱漲」係要「新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。」 ...

「冷縮熱漲」只是一些很簡單的科學規律
但複雜一些的，例如量子力學, 電磁學等
就會有「新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。」
就算你現在用緊的電腦或智能手機
也是有「新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。」

以前4G上網，現在5G上網，
以前ADSL寬頻上網，現在光纖入屋上網，都是「新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。」

beebeechan

就會有「新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。」
Guest from 210.6.115.x 發表於 2023/7/29 10:42

既然有「新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。」, 即現在的甚麼進化, 大爆炸都不是對宇宙萬物地上生物的完滿解作。日後會有新版本, 新理論?

咁就唔好咁快認叻, 認屎認屁,....霸住個關愛座。 還啲起身讓座俾老人家

既然有「新的發現，不斷繼續研究、完善、擴展。」, 即現在的甚麼進化, 大爆炸都不是對宇宙萬物地上生物的 ...

首先，科學從不會聲稱科學係真理
此外，科學也不等於事實。

科學只係依照科學方法探索出黎的道理、理論、規則。

科學強調可證偽性，
一切科學理論，都係可被推翻，但仍未被推翻。

科學定律都只不過係人類長期觀察下，
仍然無被推翻，無發現有明顯例外情況的規則。

所以你係打稻草人

首先，科學從不會聲稱科學係真理
此外，科學也不等於事實。

科學只係依照科學方法探索出黎的道理、理論 ...

至於宗教，就聲稱自己係真理、事實、道路、生命，不可能被推翻的

但根據觀察經驗所得，凡人類所聲稱的東西係真理，不可被推翻的，不是詐騙，便是無知。

beebeechan

首先，科學從不會聲稱科學係真理
此外，科學也不等於事實。

Guest from 124.217.137.x 發表於 2023/7/31 09:19

至於宗教，就聲稱自己係真理、事實、道路、生命，不可能被推翻的

但根據觀察經驗所得，凡人類所聲稱的東西係真理，不可被推翻的，不是詐騙，便是無知。

科學吾係真理, 宗教又話唔係真理.....咁呢個世界就「冇真理」？
真理...在甚麼條件下先形成咁尼?

(你知唔知你講緊乜, 一定唔係真理!)...一堆廢話!

科學吾係真理, 宗教又話唔係真理.....咁呢個世界就「冇真理」？
真理...在甚麼條件下先形成咁尼?

人類只係宇宙中一粒微塵，壽命不過一百，連火星到去唔到，
每人擁有一個不多於2KG的大腦，憑咩野可以理解宇宙真理

不過，人類有能力創造智能手機，可以秒速把資訊由香港傳到美國，還能用無線電傳送，
可以創造CHATGPT，成績已經不錯了。

beebeechan

人類只係宇宙中一粒微塵，壽命不過一百，連火星到去唔到，
每人擁有一個不多於2KG的大腦，憑咩野可以理解 ...


不過，人類有能力創造智能手機，可以秒速把資訊由香港傳到美國，還能用無線電傳送，
可以創造CHATGPT，成績已經不錯了。
Guest from 210.6.115.x 發表於 2023/7/31 22:02

chatGPT, 秒速的絡......還是由2kg的腦袋創造出來的

beebeechan

憑咩野可以理解 ...
Guest from 210.6.115.x 發表於 2023/7/31 22:02

咁即係有冇真理先。。。。
未能理解唔等如冇架喎

科學吾係真理, 宗教又話唔係真理.....咁呢個世界就「冇真理」？
真理...在甚麼條件下先形成咁尼?]

似乎你無法接受人類的渺小無能與無知，無法接受在人類世界的認知中係沒有真理的事實

科學不是真理，科學只是一個開放公開的知識系統，接受科學界各人士的檢驗，
原則上任何科學學說都可被推翻，但到目前仍未被人推翻

beebeechan

人類只係宇宙中一粒微塵，
Guest from 210.6.115.x 發表於 2023/7/31 22:02

係囉。。。點解咁大宇宙，　只有呢粒微塵係咁燦爛