weakest

I think the children nowadays are very 早熟 (perhaps because children have to face competition in very young ages, e.g. for competition for places of good schools). Therefore, I believe those children in secondary school (even if in Form 1) (and even some senior primary school students) could make their own rational choice (of course, they may be lack of experience when compared to those much older (e.g. 40 years old)). As such, I see this case as 2 rational people doing something like a pair of couple. Therefore, I don't know if the girl takes the initiate (it is heard that the chance of successful "chasing" would be higher if the girl takes the initiate). I personally don't mind others fall in love with each other even if there is a great difference in ages. However, If the teacher really did something against the law (衰11), he should be prepared to bear the legal consequences.

P.S.: I really feel that it is strange for the teacher to give $100 to the girl after 開房. If the teacher just wants to give some $$ to the girl, why just pay the $$ after 開房? Is it because the girl knows that she provides a good to the teacher, and thus ask for compensation? Or is it because of the teacher just treat the girl as a sexual service provider???

[ 本帖最後由 weakest 於 2008-1-19 14:38 編輯 ]

dye

The question is silimiar to the relationship between the doctor and the patient.  (Or priest and altar boy )  The relationship is one of trust.

The girl is NOT old enough to make a rational choice!  By placing one girl underage to make the choice, we will have to place all the girl of the same age and older to make the same choice because we have no mind reader to check for maturity.  If the age is in disputed, people can always appeal to the representative in the government for a change of law.

When her guardian places her under the trust of the teacher, They probably expect the teacher to behave professionally and do not take advantage with his position as a teacher.  

A similiar situation arise when a patient listens to a doctor.about his sickness.  The patient expects the doctor to behave professionally and not tell lies for whatever reason the doctor has.

The deeper impact behind all these is that if doctors tell lie, would anyone believe the doctors?
If the teachers are allow to "temper" with his/her student, who would leave their children to the teacher?  (Would you leave your childen beside a heavy machinery in the factory?)

Therer is indeed a practical reason behind the law.

[ 本帖最後由 dye 於 2008-1-19 09:27 編輯 ]

weakest

But..........can find the 証據 of who is 主動??

訪客得得b

常言道法律不外乎人情。

男教師如果是完全主導整個事情，當真值得判終生監禁兩次啦。

但假如真的是女童引誘他的話，確是情有可原，判終生監禁作罷好了。

抽刀斷水

「只是我認為一面倒指責男教師未免太武斷而已」→當然在警方科學鑑證下是可以找到證據，但明顯傳媒及社會早已判了這男教師的罪。搞到咁大，實要佢祭旗啦。原來此乃「衰十三」（與十四歲以下少女發生性行為），罪名等同強姦，可判終身，睇下牧師求情信、感化官同心理評估做得好唔好啦。

但假如真的是女童的引誘，而這位好好先生的男教師久旱之下難以招架，真是可憐呢。

果然色字頭上一把刀！

訪客得得b

原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2008-1-19 01:07 發表
睇唔到。

覆b評：留意「而男事主則稱因女童身體不適，所以讓她身體緊挨著他，並無其他不正常關係。」這句在我看來女童是主動。當然，這事在法律上及現今道德上是不容許的，只是我認為一面倒指責男教師未免太武斷而已。 ...

你快ｄ收番呢句說話，女童驗身後就能採集証據，事情是絕不存在灰色地帶的。

[ 本帖最後由 訪客得得b 於 2008-1-19 01:39 編輯 ]

抽刀斷水

睇唔到。

覆b評：留意「而男事主則稱因女童身體不適，所以讓她身體緊挨著他，並無其他不正常關係。」這句在我看來女童是主動。當然，這事在法律上及現今道德上是不容許的，只是我認為一面倒指責男教師未免太武斷而已。

weakest

But, I think it is possible for the girl to 引誘 the teacher. It is particularly strange that the teacher give the girl $$ after having sex (or just 開房without doing anything?? God knows...)....

沙文



睇得到嗎？

抽刀斷水

[乙水]，音[tum]，一個電腦打不到的中文字。如澳門有個地方叫[乙水]仔，Ｄ人成人[乙水]女仔。

prussianz

原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2008-1-18 10:39 發表
18/01/2008

警方在荃灣掃黃期間，揭發駭人聽聞的小學師生風化案。探員掩至一間時鐘別墅查牌時，踢爆一名五十二歲已婚男教師，正與十一歲的同校女生開房尋歡，探員大吃一驚，將涉嫌與未成年少女發生性關係的男教師拘捕。消息稱 ...

sorry ,
i did just swim hither[[[[[to-here]] from 'the above-side ,
what's ,,（乙水）'' ??h:

.a. （乙水）= ,,,,,second-waters''''' ??
.b. （乙水）= ,,,,,second-waters-fish''''' ??
.c. （乙水）= ,,,,,second-class-of-waters''''' ??
.d. （乙水）= ,,,,,second-class-of-waters-fish''''' ?? which 1's correct ??

ThANKye


[ 本帖最後由 prussianz 於 2008-1-18 17:49 編輯 ]

訪客得得b

抽評：任教教會學校小學，是教徒的機會較大。不過，兩情相悅是否要受到年齡限制？社會道德普遍認為男教師[乙水]女童，其實也可能是女童引誘男教師（如電影《Lolita》的劇情）。唉，這教師衰十一就相當大鑊了！

b評：我不同意女童引誘男教師這觀點，一個十一歲女童縱使早熟，對性有好奇，都不至於會色誘男教師那麽誇張。她可能嘗向男教師請教一些關於性的問題，致令男教師有機可乘。小朋友是不知道甚麽是對，甚麽是錯的，亦不知道如何選擇，所以才需要設立教育。

呢單衰十一案，不是一些十七歲青年與十五歲女朋友，偷食禁果那麽單純。如果男教師最後被成功檢控，刑期會長很多的。

[ 本帖最後由 訪客得得b 於 2008-1-18 16:06 編輯 ]

隨處發瘋

原帖由 抽刀斷水 於 2008-1-18 10:39 發表
18/01/2008

警方在荃灣掃黃期間，揭發駭人聽聞的小學師生風化案。探員掩至一間時鐘別墅查牌時，踢爆一名五十二歲已婚男教師，正與十一歲的同校女生開房尋歡，探員大吃一驚，將涉嫌與未成年少女發生性關係的男教師拘捕。消息稱 ...

未必,有好多教徒好似我.鍾意『扮晒野』架嗎!
呢種人真係『低』! 好心就唔好係香港開房啦! 應該好似我口甘, 同條仔離開香港,然後去澳門或大陸開房
口甘就唔唔會比人發覺啦!

(哈哈! 我遠在外國的男友都唔知架!)

[ 本帖最後由 隨處發瘋 於 2008-1-18 20:32 編輯 ]