jimmychauck

I restated 3 times the instruction, requesting Sharman to provide evidences that he brought the case to court.

He failed to.

He then refused to comment on the case, claiming that legal process is undergone.

He then also failed to recognize that a statement starting with "May" is polite.
He then also failed to recognize that any statement is an instruction to him.

I have had enough with this guy, not discussing, hiding , bluffing, spoofing.

I believe this thread had demonostrated how Sharmon is bad at communicating, discussing. And thus therefore the thread had served its purpose. Conclusion?

1. Sharmon fails to show that he understands sarcasm, retorical questioning
2. Sharmon fails to provide reasonig or information when queried upon
3. Sharmon fails to show ability to distinguish between a staturary statement or instruction.
4. Sharmon fails to show ability to distinguish between the addresser and the addressee.
6. Sharmon do not show strong ability to read English
7. Sharmon fails to demonstrate ability to extract content
8. Sharmon fails to follow simple instruction.