回覆 30# Guest from 175.181.161.x
你以一個有違常理的邏輯去詮釋歷史。
你說,耶穌時代,只有耶穌能醫一些奇難症,「誰會主張殺了唯一有辦法治病的人?因此耶穌不存在」
你自覺非常合理。
我平衡你的邏輯,說,袁崇煥時代,只有他一個能擋清兵,「誰會主張殺了唯一有辦法救國的人?因此袁崇煥不存在」
你則大大嗤之以鼻。
君不見自己純為找基督教的碴乎?雙重標準做到盡。
耶穌時代,亦不是所有人都主張殺耶穌
1. 門徒不主張
2. 某些法利賽人不主張
3. 以色列人在殺耶穌後被指責即感扎心
耶穌只被些少宗教特權者煽動一城的人殺死
可見你詮釋歷史的手法,根本大有問題,不足立任何論。
別裝聰明說什麼藥物手術,發明麻弗散的華佗,還不是教曹孟德殺了?當權者殺個把醫生有啥希奇,還要自己排出來做文章,你懂歷史不懂?懂羞不懂?
Wiki:
Horus was born to the goddess Isis after she retrieved all the dismembered body parts of her murdered husband Osiris, except his penis which was thrown into the Nile and eaten by a catfish,[6][7]
就是錯的,你引的資料貼文就是對的
One theory finds similarities between the Egyptian god Horus and Jesus. Writer Gerald Massey argued that the deity of Horus and Jesus shared identical mythological origins in his 1907 book Ancient Egypt, the light of the world.[12] Most contemporary Egyptologists believe these parallels are not true and are pseudo-scientific.[13][14][15][16][17][18]
就是錯的
W. Ward Gasque conducted a world-wide poll of twenty leading Egyptologists to verify if there was any academic support for these claims. The scholars were unanimous in dismissing the claimed parallels.
就是錯的
[20][21][22][23]
View REPEATED 就是對的
你的行為就是「選擇性資料閱讀」的絕佳示範了!
我跟你講,你聽袁木說吧,六四只死了廿三人。
請啊請啊… |